IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/capriw/50002.html

Collective Action for Small-Scale Producers of Agricultural Biodiversity Products

Author

Listed:
  • Kruijssen, Froukje
  • Keizer, Menno
  • Giuliani, Alessandra

Abstract

The role of well-functioning markets for development is now widely recognized, however the challenge remains to make these markets benefit the poor and the environment. Increasing attention is being given to the potential role markets can play for agrobiodiversity conservation through product diversification and increasing competitiveness in niche and novelty markets. Bioversity International has undertaken several studies that explore the use of market-based approaches to on-farm agrobiodiversity management and livelihood improvement. Case studies have been developed on a range of species, varieties and derived products, including underutilized species and commodities in several regions of the world. This paper explores how the theory of collective action can provide a more synthetic understanding of how market chains operate and how changes in the market chain and market institutions can permit a more equitable distribution of welfare benefits. The case studies illustrate the need for improved trust, a mutual understanding of each actor’s involvement and the need for an agreed process of collective action that involves a high level of community participation to achieve an improved market chain organization benefiting the poor. The cases differ in their degree of collective action, the level of market organization and the ways in which handling, processing, and innovative marketing add value to the agrobiodiversity products. Comparative analysis of these cases identified a range of options and situations in which market development can support agrobiodiversity conservation and livelihoods. Bringing together these experiences will also help to identify the situations in which a collective approach can maximize the capturing of market benefits for smallholders. Trade-offs between income generation, livelihood security, and agrobiodiversity conservation should be further examined in order to find solutions that support sustainable development of poor communities that manage agricultural biodiversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kruijssen, Froukje & Keizer, Menno & Giuliani, Alessandra, 2007. "Collective Action for Small-Scale Producers of Agricultural Biodiversity Products," CAPRi Working Papers 50002, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:capriw:50002
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.50002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/50002/files/capriwp71.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.50002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnson, Nancy & Lundy, Mark & Suarez , Ruth, 2002. "La importancia del capital social en las agroempresas rurales de Colombia," CAPRi working papers 26, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Johnson, Nancy L. & Suarez, R & Lundy, Mark M., 2002. "The importance of social capital in Colombian rural agro-enterprises," CAPRi working papers 26, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Giuliani, Alessandra & Gruère, Guillaume & Smale, Melinda, 2006. "Marketing underutilized plant species for the benefit of the poor: a conceptual framework," EPTD discussion papers 154, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Jabbar, Mohammad A. & Tambi, E & Mullins, G, 1997. "A research methodology for characterizing dairy marketing systems," Research Reports 182903, International Livestock Research Institute.
    5. Eyzaguirre, Pablo & McCarthy, Nancy & di Gregorio, Monica & Dennis, Evan, 2004. "Property Rights, Collective Action And Plant Genetic Resources," 2020 Focus Briefs 16569, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Pretty, Jules & Ward, Hugh, 2001. "Social Capital and the Environment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 209-227, February.
    7. Eyzaguirre, Pablo B. & McCarthy, Nancy & Di Gregorio, Monica & Dennis, Evan, 2004. "Property rights, collective action, and plant genetic resources," 2020 vision briefs 11 No.10, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Johnson, Nancy L. & Suarez, Ruth & Lundy, Mark, 2002. "The Importance of Social Capital in Colombian Rural Agro-Enterprises," CAPRi Working Papers 50059, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Richard J. Sexton, 2000. "Industrialization and Consolidation in the U.S. Food Sector: Implications for Competition and Welfare," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(5), pages 1087-1104.
    10. Schmalensee, Richard, 1989. "Inter-industry studies of structure and performance," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 16, pages 951-1009, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kruijssen, Froukje & Keizer, Menno & Giuliani, Alessandra, 2009. "Collective action for small-scale producers of agricultural biodiversity products," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 46-52, February.
    2. Barham, James & Chitemi, Clarence, 2008. "Collective Action Initiatives to Improve Marketing Performance: Lessons from Farmer Groups in Tanzania," CAPRi Working Papers 44347, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Kaganzi, Elly & Ferris, Shaun & Barham, James & Abenakyo, Annet & Sanginga, Pascal & Njuki, Jemimah M., 2008. "Sustaining Linkages to High Value Markets Through Collective Action in Uganda: The Case of the Nyabyumba Potato Farmers," CAPRi Working Papers 44348, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Catacutan, Delia & Bertomeu, Manuel & Arbes, Lyndon & Duque, Caroline & Butra, Novie, 2008. "Fluctuating Fortunes of a Collective Enterprise: The Case of the Agroforestry Tree Seeds Association of Lantapan (ATSAL) in the Philippines," CAPRi Working Papers 44349, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Mwangi, Esther & Markelova, Helen, 2008. "Collective Action and Property Rights for Poverty Reduction: A Review of Methods and Approaches," CAPRi Working Papers 44355, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr, 2007. "Marktstruktur und Preisbildung auf dem ukrainischen Markt für Rohmilch," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 41, number 92322.
    7. Hundie, Bekele & Padmanabhan, Martina Aruna, 2008. "The Transformation of the Afar Commons in Ethiopia: State Coercion, Diversification, and Property Rights Change among Pastoralists," CAPRi Working Papers 44360, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Mainza, Nicholus Obby, . "Factors affecting income generation among smallholder farmers with agricultural cooperative membership in Zambia," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 64(2).
    9. Sheldon, Ian M., 2017. "The Competitiveness Of Agricultural Product And Input Markets: A Review And Synthesis Of Recent Research," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(1), pages 1-44, February.
    10. Ian Sheldon & Richard Sperling, 2003. "Estimating the Extent of Imperfect Competition in the Food Industry: What Have We Learned?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 89-109, March.
    11. Barham, James & Chitemi, Clarence, 2009. "Collective action initiatives to improve marketing performance: Lessons from farmer groups in Tanzania," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 53-59, February.
    12. Akbar Ullah & Ejaz Ghani & Attiya Y. Javed, 2013. "Market Power and Industrial Performance in Pakistan," PIDE-Working Papers 2013:88, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    13. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    14. Scalco, Paulo R. & Braga, Marcelo J., 2015. "Identification of Market Power in Bilateral Oligopoly: The Brazilian Wholesale Market of UHT Milk," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212278, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Lukáš Čechura & Tinoush Jamali Jaghdani, 2021. "Market Imperfections within the European Wheat Value Chain: The Case of France and the United Kingdom," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Barbara M. Roberts, "undated". "Transition and Changes in Industrial Concentration in Poland," Discussion Papers in European Economics 98/4, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    17. Asuamah Yeboah, Samuel & Mogre, Diana & Nartey Menzo, Benjamin Prince, 2024. "Beyond the Numbers: Social Factors in Credit Risk," MPRA Paper 122363, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Aug 2024.
    18. Çakır, Metin & Nolan, James, 2015. "Revisiting Concentration in Food and Agricultural Supply Chains: The Welfare Implications of Market Power in a Complementary Input Sector," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Stagnaro, Carlo & Amenta, Carlo & Di Croce, Giulia & Lavecchia, Luciano, 2020. "Managing the liberalization of Italy's retail electricity market: A policy proposal☆," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    20. Meilin Ma & Richard J. Sexton, 2021. "Modern agricultural value chains and the future of smallholder farming systems," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(4), pages 591-606, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:capriw:50002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.