IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaeaci/156789.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Soil Matters: How the Federal Crop Insurance Program should be reformed to encourage low-risk farming methods with high-reward environmental outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • O'Connor, Claire

Abstract

Although significant research has been done on managing farmers’ financial risk through federal programs such as federal crop insurance, to date, little attention has been paid to the ability of on-farm management’s potential to mitigate agricultural risk. Federal crop insurance could empower farmers to use their farm management skills to become more resilient to extreme weather conditions. This paper proposes a federal crop insurance pilot program that reduces premium rates for farmers who lower their risk of crop loss by investing in technically sound management practices that both reduce the risk of loss in the near-term and build soil health and increase productive capacity in the long-term. For example, soil moisture management practices, such as conservation tillage, cover cropping, and improved irrigation scheduling, reduce weather-related risks, such as droughts and floods. In the short-term, encouraging practices that increase soil moisture and water infiltration, as well as combat pest pressures, will help decrease yield fluctuation due to unfavorable weather in a given year. In the long-term, farmers who invest in soil health will increase their fields’ yield potential and be better prepared to face the challenge of a changing climate, in which extreme weather events are predicted to be more frequent and intense. Because these practices reduce the risk of crop loss, federal crop insurance can and should encourage them through an actuarially sound premium reduction pilot program.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Connor, Claire, 2013. "Soil Matters: How the Federal Crop Insurance Program should be reformed to encourage low-risk farming methods with high-reward environmental outcomes," 2013 AAEA: Crop Insurance and the Farm Bill Symposium, October 8-9, Louisville, KY 156789, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeaci:156789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/156789
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry K. Goodwin & Monte L. Vandeveer & John L. Deal, 2004. "An Empirical Analysis of Acreage Effects of Participation in the Federal Crop Insurance Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(4), pages 1058-1077.
    2. Miao, Ruiqing & Feng, Hongli & Hennessy, David A., 2011. "Land Use Consequences of Crop Insurance Subsidies," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103891, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Toliver, Dustin K. & Larson, James A. & English, Burton C. & Roberts, Roland K. & Torre Ugarte, Daniel de la & West, Tristram O., 2011. "Effects of No-Tillage Production Practices on Crop Yields as Influenced by Crop and Growing Environment Factors," 2011 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2011, Corpus Christi, Texas 98818, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Ramirez, Octavio A. & Carpio, Carlos E. & Rejesus, Roderick M., 2011. "Can Crop Insurance Premiums Be Reliably Estimated?," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 40(1), April.
    5. Osteen, Craig D. & Vasavada, Utpal, 2012. "Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2012 Edition," Economic Information Bulletin 132048, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Ko, Jonghan & Piccinni, Giovanni, 2009. "Corn yield responses under crop evapotranspiration-based irrigation management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 799-808, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    crop insurance; no-till; cover crop; Agricultural and Food Policy; Crop Production/Industries; Environmental Economics and Policy; Farm Management; Risk and Uncertainty;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeaci:156789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.