IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pfa5.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Ulrich Faigle

Personal Details

First Name:Ulrich
Middle Name:
Last Name:Faigle
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pfa5
http://www.zaik.uni-koeln.de/AFS

Research output

as
Jump to: Articles

Articles

  1. Jeroen Kuipers & Ulrich Faigle & Walter Kern, 2001. "On the computation of the nucleolus of a cooperative game," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 30(1), pages 79-98.
  2. Jeroen Kuipers & Ulrich Faigle & Walter Kern, 1998. "Note Computing the nucleolus of min-cost spanning tree games is NP-hard," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 27(3), pages 443-450.
  3. Ulrich Faigle & Walter Kern & Winfried Hochstättler & Sándor P. Fekete, 1997. "On the Complexity of Testing Membership in the Core of Min-Cost Spanning Tree Games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 26(3), pages 361-366.
  4. Faigle, U & Kern, W, 1992. "The Shapley Value for Cooperative Games under Precedence Constraints," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 21(3), pages 249-266.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Articles

  1. Jeroen Kuipers & Ulrich Faigle & Walter Kern, 2001. "On the computation of the nucleolus of a cooperative game," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 30(1), pages 79-98.

    Cited by:

    1. Cesco, Juan Carlos, 2008. "A general characterization for non-balanced games in terms of U-cycles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 409-415, December.
    2. Péter Biró & Walter Kern & Daniël Paulusma, 2012. "Computing solutions for matching games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(1), pages 75-90, February.
    3. Nguyen, Tri-Dung & Thomas, Lyn, 2016. "Finding the nucleoli of large cooperative games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 1078-1092.
    4. Ulrich Faigle & Walter Kern & Jeroen Kuipers, 2006. "Computing an Element in the Lexicographic Kernel of a Game," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 63(3), pages 427-433, July.
    5. Kuipers, Jeroen & Mosquera, Manuel A. & Zarzuelo, José M., 2013. "Sharing costs in highways: A game theoretic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 158-168.
    6. Kimms, Alf & Çetiner, Demet, 2012. "Approximate nucleolus-based revenue sharing in airline alliances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 510-521.
    7. Guajardo, Mario & Jörnsten, Kurt, 2014. "Common Mistakes in Computing the Nucleolus," Discussion Papers 2014/15, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    8. Drechsel, J. & Kimms, A., 2010. "Computing core allocations in cooperative games with an application to cooperative procurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 310-321, November.
    9. A. Palestini & G. Pignataro, 2013. "A multi-factor inequality approach to a transfer scheme: the case of Common Agricultural Policy," Working Papers wp891, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    10. Takuya Masuzawa, 2008. "Computing the cores of strategic games with punishment–dominance relations," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 37(2), pages 185-201, June.
    11. Granot, Daniel & Hamers, Herbert & Kuipers, Jeroen & Maschler, Michael, 2011. "On Chinese postman games where residents of each road pay the cost of their road," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 427-438, June.

  2. Jeroen Kuipers & Ulrich Faigle & Walter Kern, 1998. "Note Computing the nucleolus of min-cost spanning tree games is NP-hard," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 27(3), pages 443-450.

    Cited by:

    1. Ballester, Coralio, 2004. "NP-completeness in hedonic games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-30, October.
    2. Balázs Sziklai & Tamás Fleiner & Tamás Solymosi, 2014. "On the Core of Directed Acyclic Graph Games," IEHAS Discussion Papers 1418, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
    3. Sung, Shao-Chin & Dimitrov, Dinko, 2010. "Computational complexity in additive hedonic games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 635-639, June.
    4. F.Javier Martínez-de-Albéniz & Carles Rafels & Neus Ybern, 2015. "Insights into the nucleolus of the assignment game," UB Economics Working Papers 2015/333, Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat d'Economia i Empresa, UB Economics.
    5. Tamas Solymosi & Balazs Sziklai, 2015. "Universal Characterization Sets for the Nucleolus in Balanced Games," IEHAS Discussion Papers 1512, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

  3. Ulrich Faigle & Walter Kern & Winfried Hochstättler & Sándor P. Fekete, 1997. "On the Complexity of Testing Membership in the Core of Min-Cost Spanning Tree Games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 26(3), pages 361-366.

    Cited by:

    1. Ulrich Faigle & Walter Kern & Jeroen Kuipers, 2006. "Computing an Element in the Lexicographic Kernel of a Game," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 63(3), pages 427-433, July.
    2. Drechsel, J. & Kimms, A., 2010. "Computing core allocations in cooperative games with an application to cooperative procurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 310-321, November.
    3. Phuoc Hoang Le & Tri-Dung Nguyen & Tolga Bektaş, 2016. "Generalized minimum spanning tree games," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(2), pages 167-188, May.

  4. Faigle, U & Kern, W, 1992. "The Shapley Value for Cooperative Games under Precedence Constraints," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 21(3), pages 249-266.

    Cited by:

    1. Michel Grabisch, 2013. "The core of games on ordered structures and graphs," PSE - Labex "OSE-Ouvrir la Science Economique" hal-00803233, HAL.
    2. Fabien Lange & Michel Grabisch, 2006. "Values on regular games under Kirchhoff's laws," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b06087, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    3. Herings, P.J.J. & van der Laan, G. & Talman, A.J.J., 2007. "The socially stable core in structured transferable utility games," Other publications TiSEM 28c8ea20-8a66-4d9e-b054-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Koshevoy, Gleb & Talman, Dolf, 2014. "Solution concepts for games with general coalitional structure," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 19-30.
    5. Michel Grabisch, 2016. "Remarkable polyhedra related to set functions, games and capacities," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01412292, HAL.
    6. Hougaard, J. & Moreno-Ternero, J. & Tvede, M. & Osterdal, L., 2015. "Sharing the proceeds from a hierarchical venture," CORE Discussion Papers 2015031, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. van den Brink, R. & van der Laan, G. & Herings, P.J.J. & Talman, A.J.J., 2015. "The Average Tree permission value for games with a permission tree," Other publications TiSEM 97042492-4b03-4e72-b88d-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Michel Grabisch, 2010. "Ensuring the boundedness of the core of games with restricted cooperation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00544134, HAL.
    9. László Á. Kóczy, 2014. "Power indices when players can commit to reject coalitions," IEHAS Discussion Papers 1431, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
    10. Meng, Fanyong & Chen, Xiaohong & Zhang, Qiang, 2015. "A coalitional value for games on convex geometries with a coalition structure," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 605-614.
    11. Ulrich Faigle & Michel Grabisch & Maximilian Heyne, 2010. "Monge extensions of cooperation and communication structures," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00625336, HAL.
    12. Michel Grabisch & Peter Sudhölter, 2016. "On a class of vertices of the core," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16077, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    13. Ulrich Faigle & Michel Grabisch, 2013. "A concise axiomatization of a Shapley-type value for stochastic coalition processes," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 13052, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    14. Michel Grabisch & Peter Sudhölter, 2012. "On the restricted cores and the bounded core of games on distributive lattices," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 12067, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    15. Ulrich Faigle & Michel Grabisch & Andres Jiménez-Losada & Manuel Ordóñez, 2016. "Games on concept lattices: Shapley value and core," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01379699, HAL.
    16. J. Bilbao & A. Jiménez-Losada & E. Lebrón & S. Tijs, 2002. "Theτ-value for games on matroids," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 10(1), pages 67-81, June.
    17. René van den Brink & Gerard van der Laan & Valeri Vasil'ev, 2007. "Distributing Dividends in Games with Ordered Players," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 06-114/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    18. M. G. Fiestras-Janeiro & E. Sánchez-Rodríguez & M. Schuster, 2016. "A precedence constraint value revisited," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(1), pages 156-179, April.
    19. Michel Grabisch, 2016. "Remarkable polyhedra related to set functions, games," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16081, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    20. Khmelnitskaya, Anna & Talman, Dolf, 2014. "Tree, web and average web values for cycle-free directed graph games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 233-246.
    21. Encarnación Algaba & René Brink & Chris Dietz, 2017. "Power Measures and Solutions for Games Under Precedence Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 1008-1022, March.
    22. J. Bilbao & E. Lebrón & N. Jiménez, 2000. "Simple games on closure spaces," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 8(1), pages 43-55, June.
    23. René Brink & Chris Dietz & Gerard Laan & Genjiu Xu, 2017. "Comparable characterizations of four solutions for permission tree games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 63(4), pages 903-923, April.
    24. Michel Grabisch & Peter Sudhölter, 2016. "Characterizations of solutions for games with precedence constraints," PSE - Labex "OSE-Ouvrir la Science Economique" hal-01297600, HAL.
    25. Michel Grabisch & Lijue Xie, 2011. "The restricted core of games on distributive lattices: how to share benefits in a hierarchy," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00583868, HAL.
    26. Labreuche, Christophe, 2011. "Interaction indices for games on combinatorial structures with forbidden coalitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(1), pages 99-108, October.
    27. Bilbao, J.M. & Ordóñez, M., 2009. "Axiomatizations of the Shapley value for games on augmenting systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 1008-1014, August.
    28. Branzei, R. & Tijs, S. & Zarzuelo, J., 2009. "Convex multi-choice games: Characterizations and monotonic allocation schemes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 571-575, October.
    29. Michel Grabisch, 2015. "Fuzzy Measures and Integrals: Recent Developments," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01302377, HAL.
    30. Bilbao, J. M. & Lebron, E. & Jimenez, N., 1999. "The core of games on convex geometries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 365-372, December.
    31. Michel Grabisch & Peter Sudhölter, 2012. "The Bounded Core for Games with Precedence Constraints," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00673909, HAL.
    32. Richard Baron & Sylvain Béal & Éric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2011. "Average Tree Solutions and the Distribution of Harsanyi Dividends," Post-Print halshs-00674425, HAL.
    33. Derks, Jean & Peters, Hans, 1997. "Consistent restricted Shapley values," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 75-91, February.
    34. Karl Ortmann, 2013. "A cooperative value in a multiplicative model," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 21(3), pages 561-583, September.
    35. A. Jiménez-Losada, 2017. "Comments on: Games with a permission structure - A survey on generalizations and applications," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 39-41, April.
    36. Monjardet, Bernard, 2003. "The presence of lattice theory in discrete problems of mathematical social sciences. Why," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 103-144, October.
    37. René van den Brink, 2017. "Games with a Permission Structure: a survey on generalizations and applications," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-016/II, Tinbergen Institute.
    38. Mikel Álvarez-Mozos & Rene van den Brink & Gerard van der Laan & Oriol Tejada, 2015. "From Hierarchies to Levels: New Solutions for Games with Hierarchical Structure," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 15/215, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    39. E. Algaba & J. Bilbao & R. Brink, 2015. "Harsanyi power solutions for games on union stable systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 225(1), pages 27-44, February.
    40. Richard Baron & Sylvain Béal & Éric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2008. "Average tree solutions for graph games," Post-Print hal-00332570, HAL.
    41. René Brink, 2017. "Games with a permission structure - A survey on generalizations and applications," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 1-33, April.
    42. Emilio Calvo & Esther Gutiérrez-López, 2015. "The value in games with restricted cooperation," Discussion Papers in Economic Behaviour 0115, University of Valencia, ERI-CES.
    43. Koshevoy, G.A. & Suzuki, T. & Talman, A.J.J., 2013. "Solutions For Games With General Coalitional Structure And Choice Sets," Discussion Paper 2013-012, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    44. Phuoc Hoang Le & Tri-Dung Nguyen & Tolga Bektaş, 2016. "Generalized minimum spanning tree games," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(2), pages 167-188, May.
    45. René van den Brink & Gerard van der Laan & Valeri Vasil'ev, 0000. "The Restricted Core for Totally Positive Games with Ordered Players," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 09-038/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    46. Lei Li & Xueliang Li, 2011. "The covering values for acyclic digraph games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(4), pages 697-718, November.
    47. Encarnacion Algaba & René van den Brink & Chris Dietz, 2015. "Power Measures and Solutions for Games under Precedence Constraints," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-007/II, Tinbergen Institute.
    48. Eduard Kromer & Ludger Overbeck, 2013. "Suitability of Capital Allocations for Performance Measurement," Papers 1301.5497, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2014.
    49. Michel Grabisch & Fabien Lange, 2007. "Games on lattices, multichoice games and the Shapley value: a new approach," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00178916, HAL.
    50. Michel Grabisch & Lijue Xie, 2007. "A new approach to the core and Weber set of multichoice games," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00267933, HAL.
    51. Mikel Álvarez-Mozos & René van den Brink & Gerard van der Laan & Oriol Tejada, 2015. "From Hierarchies to Levels: New Solutions for Games," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-072/II, Tinbergen Institute.
    52. Hamers, Herbert & Husslage, Bart & Lindelauf, R. & Campen, Tjeerd, 2016. "A New Approximation Method for the Shapley Value Applied to the WTC 9/11 Terrorist Attack," Discussion Paper 2016-042, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    53. Bilbao, J. M., 1998. "Axioms for the Shapley value on convex geometries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 368-376, October.
    54. Michel Grabisch & Peter Sudhölter, 2014. "The positive core for games with precedence constraints," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01020282, HAL.
    55. Suzuki, T. & Talman, A.J.J., 2011. "Solution Concepts for Cooperative Games with Circular Communication Structure," Discussion Paper 2011-100, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    56. Peters Hans & Zank H., 1999. "A Class of Methods for Evaluating Multiattribute Utilities," Research Memorandum 034, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    57. Yu-Hsien Liao, 2018. "The precore: converse consistent enlargements and alternative axiomatic results," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(1), pages 146-163, April.
    58. Elena Parilina & Artem Sedakov, 2014. "Stable Bank Cooperation for Cost Reduction Problem," Czech Economic Review, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, vol. 8(1), pages 7-25, August.
    59. Khmelnitskaya, A. & Selçuk, O. & Talman, A.J.J., 2014. "The Shapley Value for Directed Graph Games," Discussion Paper 2014-064, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    60. Takashi Ui & Hiroyuki Kojima & Atsushi Kajii, 2011. "The Myerson value for complete coalition structures," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 74(3), pages 427-443, December.
    61. Edelman, Paul H., 1997. "A note on voting," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 37-50, August.
    62. Algaba, A. & Bilbao, J.M. & van den Brink, J.R. & Jiménez-Losada, A., 2000. "Cooperative Games on Antimatroids," Discussion Paper 2000-124, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    63. Koshevoy, G.A. & Talman, A.J.J., 2011. "Solution Concepts for Games with General Coalitional Structure (Replaces CentER DP 2011-025)," Discussion Paper 2011-119, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Ulrich Faigle should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.