IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v45y2024i1p339-352.html

Assessing the impact of pure market, government, and social organization interaction on the effectiveness of public service procurement

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohan Li
  • Yang Lv
  • Yibo Liu

Abstract

This study employs qualitative comparative analysis to investigate the effects of different interaction modes, namely, functional substitution and strategic cooperation, on the effectiveness of public service procurement. It reveals that the interaction between the government and social organizations in China's current public service procurement presents a composite form, combining functional substitution and strategic cooperation. Government support for social organizations plays a critical role in procurement effectiveness. The greater the government support, the higher the effectiveness of public service procurement. The study finds that “pure market” and “pure competition” do not necessarily contribute positively to the effectiveness of public service procurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohan Li & Yang Lv & Yibo Liu, 2024. "Assessing the impact of pure market, government, and social organization interaction on the effectiveness of public service procurement," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(1), pages 339-352, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:45:y:2024:i:1:p:339-352
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chunrong Yan & Danyang Di & Guoxiang Li & Jianmei Wang, 2022. "Environmental regulation and the supply efficiency of environmental public services: Evidence from environmental decentralization of 289 cities in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 515-535, June.
    2. Cull, Robert & Xu, Lixin Colin & Yang, Xi & Zhou, Li-An & Zhu, Tian, 2017. "Market facilitation by local government and firm efficiency: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 460-480.
    3. Pappas, Ilias O. & Woodside, Arch G., 2021. "Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Francois, Patrick, 2000. "'Public service motivation' as an argument for government provision," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 275-299, November.
    5. Cheng, Minying & Jin, Ling & Li, Zhisheng & Lin, Bingxuan, 2022. "The effectiveness of government stock purchase during market crash: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Chen Yanfang & Geng Hong, 2018. "Research on the Risk Prevention of Government Purchase of Public Services," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(2), pages 187-187, January.
    7. Oh, Seunghwan & Jang, Pilseong & Kwak, Gihyun, 2022. "Enhancing the efficiency of governmental intervention in the venture capital market: The monitoring effect," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 450-463.
    8. Zhou, Wubiao, 2017. "Institutional environment, public-private hybrid forms, and entrepreneurial reinvestment in a transition economy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 197-214.
    9. Germà Bel & Xavier Fageda, 2017. "What have we learned from the last three decades of empirical studies on factors driving local privatisation?," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 503-511, July.
    10. Weerawardena, Jay & Salunke, Sandeep & Haigh, Nardia & Sullivan Mort, Gillian, 2021. "Business model innovation in social purpose organizations: Conceptualizing dual social-economic value creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 762-771.
    11. Deegen, Peter & Halbritter, Andreas, 2018. "The pure market allocation of land between forestry and agriculture," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 122-131.
    12. Currie, Denise & McCracken, Martin & Venter, Katharine, 2022. "Avoiding the vicious cycle, engendering the virtuous circle: Understanding the interaction of human, social and organizational capitals in non-profit and voluntary organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 17-28.
    13. Nalban, Valeriu & Smădu, Andra, 2021. "The interaction between private sector and public sector labor markets: Evidence from Romania," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 804-821.
    14. Enjuto Martinez, Regina & Qu, Yuanyuan & Howell, Jude, 2022. "Effects of government contracting of services on NGOs in China: convergence and divergence with international experience," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124848, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. repec:ehl:lserod:111521 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Wu, Hong, 2022. "Trade openness, green finance and natural resources: A literature review," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    17. Hickey, Rónán & Lozej, Matija & Smyth, Diarmaid, 2020. "Financing government investment and its implications for public capital: A small open economy perspective," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 620-641.
    18. Cheng, Bo & Christensen, Tom & Ma, Liang & Yu, Junli, 2021. "Does public money drive out private? Evidence from government regulations of industrial overcapacity governance in urban China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 767-780.
    19. Joanna Czaplak, 2016. "Analysis Of The Effectiveness Of Public Services Provision By Local Governments In The Years 2007–2013," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 7(2), pages 223-243, June.
    20. Colin C. Williams & Jan Windebank & Sara Nadin, 2012. "Barriers to outsourcing household services to small business," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(15), pages 2365-2377, January.
    21. Zhuoyi Wen, 2017. "Government Purchase of Services in China: Similar Intentions, Different Policy Designs," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(1), pages 65-78, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amihai Glazer & Stef Proost, 2020. "Benefits to the majority from universal service," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(2), pages 391-408, April.
    2. Zheng, Weiting & Singh, Kulwant, 2025. "When competition meets connections: The asymmetric effects of political ties on firm survival and efficiency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Daniel Gibbs, 2020. "Civil service reform, self‐selection, and bureaucratic performance," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 279-304, July.
    4. Pierre Koning & J. Vyrastekova & S. Onderstal, 2006. "Team incentives in public organisations; an experimental study," CPB Discussion Paper 60, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    5. Athias, Laure & Wicht, Pascal, 2025. "Make or buy for public services: Culture matters for efficiency considerations," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Amadou Boly & Robert Gillanders & Topi Miettinen, 2016. "Deterrence, peer effect, and legitimacy in anti-corruption policy-making: An experimental analysis," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-137, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Josse Delfgaauw & Robert Dur, 2008. "Incentives and Workers' Motivation in the Public Sector," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(525), pages 171-191, January.
    8. Osakwe, Christian Nedu & Ogunmokun, Oluwatobi A. & Elgammal, Islam & Kwarteng, Michael Adu, 2025. "Individuals' attitudes and their adoption intentions of central bank digital currency: Combining theories and analytics for deeper insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Siman Xie & Fouad Jamaani & Muhammad Farhan Bashir, 2025. "Natural Resources Consumption, Renewable Energy Investments and Digital Infrastructure: Analyzing Climate Change in Top‐10 Resource Consuming Economies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 6328-6342, August.
    10. Jörg L. Spenkuch & Edoardo Teso & Guo Xu, 2023. "Ideology and Performance in Public Organizations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(4), pages 1171-1203, July.
    11. Lv, Bingyang & Liu, Yongzheng & Li, Yan, 2020. "Fiscal incentives, competition, and investment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Diego Campagnolo & Martina Gianecchini & Luigi Mosca, 2024. "Configurations of business model themes and strategies in small firms: a qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(3), pages 1-29, September.
    13. Hans Gersbach & Maija Halonen-Akatwijuka, 2005. "Mixing Private and Public Service Providers and Specialization," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 05/131, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    14. Laurent Franckx & Isabelle Brose, 2004. "A theoretical framework for incentives in the public sector," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 10(2), pages 1-8.
    15. Dietrichson, Jens, 2013. "Coordination Incentives, Performance Measurement and Resource Allocation in Public Sector Organizations," Working Papers 2013:26, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    16. Amadou Boly & Robert Gillanders & Topi Miettinen, 2016. "Deterrence, peer effect, and legitimacy in anti-corruption policy-making: An experimental analysis," WIDER Working Paper Series 137, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Prentice, Catherine & Tianchai, Maneerat & Zeidan, Susan & Wang, Xuequn, 2025. "An asymmetrical pilot resilience model – fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 171-179.
    18. Bin Tang & Huimin Yu & Dechen Zhu, 2025. "Building Child-Friendly Cities: Role of Infringement Incidents in Policy Agenda Setting," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 18(3), pages 1277-1303, June.
    19. Tobias Böhm & Nadine Riedel, 2013. "On Selection into Public Civil Service," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 59(1), pages 34-71, March.
    20. Best, Bernadette & Miller, Kristel & McAdam, Rodney & Maalaoui, Adnane, 2022. "Business model innovation within SPOs: Exploring the antecedents and mechanisms facilitating multi-level value co-creation within a value-network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 475-494.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:45:y:2024:i:1:p:339-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.