IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/humman/v10y2025i2d10.1007_s41463-025-00209-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redefining Firms in a Crisis Era: A Conceptual Framework for a Humanistic Approach Post-COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Emiliano Di Carlo

    (University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’–)

  • Silvia Cervi

    (University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’–)

Abstract

The fight against COVID-19 has been a significant global challenge with profound health, economic and social consequences, launching a VUCA (‘volatility’, ‘uncertainty’, ‘complexity’, ‘ambiguity’) era. The crisis highlighted resource shortages and uncertainty, prompting a reevaluation of the role of firms in society. Abandoning the guise of a mere profit generating tool, firms emerged as essential social actors, able to provide crucial resources during economic and relational famine. This shift determined a rethinking of capitalism, where the challenge was not just profit maximization for shareholders, but the inability to generate profits or to change the way to generate profits. To overcome the crisis, a common organizing approach was developed, enabling communities of people to work together for the common good. Analyzing the literature on corporate finalism, the paper explores how the fight against COVID-19 has reshaped the conception of firms as real entities dedicated to promoting the common good of stakeholders and society at large. The result is a more holistic model of firm and human being, aligned to the personalist principle, which overcomes both shareholder and stakeholder theories. Indeed, while these approaches have neglected crucial individual and corporate behavior to counteract the pandemic, the proposed theory seems to better address these issues, guaranteeing durability and growth during a profound economic and social crisis, such as COVID-19. Thus, the discussion contributes to the ongoing debate on the corporate purpose and provides useful insights for managers and corporate governance bodies, inspiring a more virtuous form of capitalism that promises a better future.

Suggested Citation

  • Emiliano Di Carlo & Silvia Cervi, 2025. "Redefining Firms in a Crisis Era: A Conceptual Framework for a Humanistic Approach Post-COVID-19," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 273-297, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:humman:v:10:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s41463-025-00209-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s41463-025-00209-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41463-025-00209-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41463-025-00209-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessandro Zattoni, 2011. "Who Should Control a Corporation? Toward a Contingency Stakeholder Model for Allocating Ownership Rights," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 255-274, October.
    2. Paul Mather, 2020. "Leadership and governance in a crisis: some reflections on COVID-19," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(4), pages 579-585, November.
    3. Colin Mayer, 2021. "The Future of the Corporation and the Economics of Purpose," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 887-901, May.
    4. Michael Pirson & Deepak Malhotra, 2011. "Foundations of Organizational Trust: What Matters to Different Stakeholders?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 1087-1104, August.
    5. Thöni, Christian & Volk, Stefan, 2018. "Conditional cooperation: Review and refinement," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 37-40.
    6. Terence Tse, 2011. "Shareholder and stakeholder theory: after the financial crisis," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(1), pages 51-63, April.
    7. Yasheng Chen & Zhuojun Wu, 2022. "Taking Risks to Make Profit during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W., 1989. "Management entrenchment : The case of manager-specific investments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 123-139, November.
    9. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 32-42, January.
    10. Shazia Rashid & Sunishtha Singh Yadav, 2020. "Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Higher Education and Research," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 14(2), pages 340-343, August.
    11. Claudine Gartenberg & Andrea Prat & George Serafeim, 2019. "Corporate Purpose and Financial Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Bo Bian & Jingjing Li & Ting Xu & Natasha Z. Foutz, 2022. "Individualism during Crises," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(2), pages 368-385, May.
    13. Yves Fassin, 2012. "Stakeholder Management, Reciprocity and Stakeholder Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 83-96, August.
    14. Giulia Motta Zanin & Eleonora Gentile & Alessandro Parisi & Danilo Spasiano, 2020. "A Preliminary Evaluation of the Public Risk Perception Related to the COVID-19 Health Emergency in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Surendra Arjoon & Alvaro Turriago-Hoyos & Ulf Thoene, 2018. "Virtuousness and the Common Good as a Conceptual Framework for Harmonizing the Goals of the Individual, Organizations, and the Economy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 143-163, January.
    16. Terence Tse, 2011. "Shareholder and stakeholder theory: after the financial crisis," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(1), pages 51-63, April.
    17. Harris, Jared D. & Freeman, R. Edward, 2008. "The Impossibility of the Separation Thesis: A Response to Joakim Sandberg," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 541-548, October.
    18. Evan Peterson, 2013. "Compliance and ethics programs: competitive advantage through the law," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(4), pages 1027-1045, November.
    19. Stephen G. Bronars & Donald R. Deere, 1991. "The Threat of Unionization, the Use of Debt, and the Preservation of Shareholder Wealth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 106(1), pages 231-254.
    20. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    21. Heath, Joseph, 2009. "The Uses and Abuses of Agency Theory," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 497-528, October.
    22. Anant K. Sundaram & Andrew C. Inkpen, 2004. "The Corporate Objective Revisited," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 350-363, June.
    23. Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Khan, Zaheer & Wood, Geoffrey, 2021. "COVID-19 and business failures: The paradoxes of experience, scale, and scope for theory and practice," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 179-184.
    24. Charles W. L. Hill & Thomas M. Jones, 1992. "Stakeholder‐Agency Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 131-154, March.
    25. Margherita, Alessandro & Heikkilä, Marikka, 2021. "Business continuity in the COVID-19 emergency: A framework of actions undertaken by world-leading companies," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 683-695.
    26. David Natali, 2022. "COVID-19 and the opportunity to change the neoliberal agenda: evidence from socio-employment policy responses across Europe," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 15-30, February.
    27. Davide Furceri & Prakash Loungani & Jonathan D. Ostry & Pietro Pizzuto, 2022. "Will COVID-19 Have Long-Lasting Effects on Inequality? Evidence from Past Pandemics," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(4), pages 811-839, December.
    28. Phillips, Robert & Freeman, R. Edward & Wicks, Andrew C., 2003. "What Stakeholder Theory is Not," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 479-502, October.
    29. Hayne E. Leland., 1998. "Agency Costs, Risk Management, and Capital Structure," Research Program in Finance Working Papers RPF-278, University of California at Berkeley.
    30. Sardar Ahmad & Saeed Akbar & Devendra Kodwani & Anwar Halari & Syed Zubair Shah, 2023. "Compliance or non‐compliance during financial crisis: Does it matter?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2348-2366, July.
    31. Tobias Hahn & Jonatan Pinkse & Lutz Preuss & Frank Figge, 2015. "Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 297-316, March.
    32. Shibata, Ippei, 2021. "The distributional impact of recessions: The global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic recession," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    33. Sandberg, Joakim, 2008. "Understanding the Separation Thesis," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 213-232, April.
    34. Laura Albareda & Alejo Jose G. Sison, 2020. "Commons Organizing: Embedding Common Good and Institutions for Collective Action. Insights from Ethics and Economics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(4), pages 727-743, November.
    35. Wei Shi & Kevin Veenstra, 2021. "The Moderating Effect of Cultural Values on the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 89-107, November.
    36. Joan Fontrodona & Alejo Sison, 2006. "The Nature of the Firm, Agency Theory and Shareholder Theory: A Critique from Philosophical Anthropology," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 33-42, June.
    37. Córdoba, Diana & Peredo, Ana Maria & Chaves, Paola, 2021. "Shaping alternatives to development: Solidarity and reciprocity in the Andes during COVID-19," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    38. Anant K. Sundaram & Andrew C. Inkpen, 2004. "Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”: A Reply," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 370-371, June.
    39. Minyahil Assefa, 2023. "COVID-19 Lockdown Restrictions and Small Business Survival Strategy: Government Supporting Schemes," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 11(2), pages 227-245, May.
    40. Phillips, Michael J., 1992. "Corporate Moral Personhood and Three Conceptions Of The Corporation," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 435-459, October.
    41. Freeman, R. Edward, 2000. "Business Ethics at the Millennium," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 169-180, January.
    42. Douglas A. Bosse & Robert A. Phillips & Jeffrey S. Harrison, 2009. "Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 447-456, April.
    43. Truong, Dothang & Truong, My D., 2022. "How do customers change their purchasing behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    44. R. Edward Freeman & Andrew C. Wicks & Bidhan Parmar, 2004. "Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 364-369, June.
    45. Chandler, Alfred D., 1984. "The Emergence of Managerial Capitalism," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(4), pages 473-503, January.
    46. Martin Schlag & Domènec Melé, 2020. "Building Institutions for the Common Good. The Practice and Purpose of Business in an Inclusive Economy," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-6, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liliana Hawrysz & Jolanta Maj, 2017. "Identification of Stakeholders of Public Interest Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Bidhan L. Parmar & Adrian Keevil & Andrew C. Wicks, 2019. "People and Profits: The Impact of Corporate Objectives on Employees’ Need Satisfaction at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 13-33, January.
    3. Kevin Levillain & Blanche Segrestin, 2019. "From primacy to purpose commitment: How emerging profit-with-purpose corporations open new corporate governance avenues," Post-Print hal-02290622, HAL.
    4. Ricardo Zózimo & Miguel Pina e Cunha & Arménio Rego, 2023. "Becoming a Fraternal Organization: Insights from the Encyclical Fratelli Tutti," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 383-399, March.
    5. Rachelle Belinga & Blanche Segrestin, 2019. "A conceptual mapping of the logics of institutional investors' corporate governance responsibilities: The case for "custodian" investor stewardship," Post-Print hal-02167819, HAL.
    6. Rachelle Belinga & Blanche Segrestin, 2019. "A conceptual mapping of the logics of institutional investors' corporate governance responsibilities: The case for "custodian" investor stewardship," Post-Print hal-02444756, HAL.
    7. Axel v. Werder, 2011. "Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Opportunism," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1345-1358, October.
    8. Levillain, Kevin & Segrestin, Blanche, 2019. "From primacy to purpose commitment: How emerging profit-with-purpose corporations open new corporate governance avenues," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 637-647.
    9. Chakraborty, Atreya & Gao, Lucia Silva & Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2019. "Managerial risk taking incentives, corporate social responsibility and firm risk," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 58-72.
    10. Claus Dierksmeier, 2020. "From Jensen to Jensen: Mechanistic Management Education or Humanistic Management Learning?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 73-87, September.
    11. Nirmala Devi Mohanadas, 2019. "A Theoretical Review on Corporate Tax Avoidance: Shareholder Approach versus Stakeholder Approach," GATR Journals jfbr160, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    12. Araniyar C. Isukul & John J. Chizea, 2017. "Corporate Governance Disclosure in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis in Nigerian and South African Banks," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, July.
    13. Witold J. Henisz & Sinziana Dorobantu & Lite J. Nartey, 2014. "Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1727-1748, December.
    14. Surroca Aguilar, Jorge & Tribo Gine, José Antonio, 2009. "Is managerial entrenchment always bad? : a CSR approach," IC3JM - Estudios = Working Papers id-09-01, Instituto Mixto Carlos III - Juan March de Ciencias Sociales (IC3JM).
    15. Allen Kaufman & Ernie Englander, 2011. "Behavioral Economics, Federalism, and the Triumph of Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 421-438, September.
    16. David Rönnegard & N. Craig Smith, 2024. "A Rawlsian Rule for Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 295-308, March.
    17. Francesco Gangi & Jérôme Méric & Rémi Jardat & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Business for society," Post-Print hal-02382307, HAL.
    18. Daryl Koehn & Maria Goranova, 2018. "Do Investors See Value in Ethically Sound CEO Apologies? Investigating Stock Market Reaction to CEO Apologies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 311-322, October.
    19. Yafet Yosafet Wilben Rissy, 2021. "The stakeholder model: its relevance, concept, and application in the Indonesian banking sector," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 219-231, September.
    20. Thomas J. Chemmanur & Dimitrios Gounopoulos & Panagiotis Koutroumpis & Yu Zhang, 2022. "CSR and Firm Survival: Evidence from the Climate and Pandemic Crises," Working Papers 935, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:humman:v:10:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s41463-025-00209-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.