IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i9d10.1007_s10668-023-03551-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agroforestry for Sustainable Development: Assessing Frameworks to Drive Agricultural Sector Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Shubhendu Singh

    (Indian Institute of Technology)

  • Gaurvendra Singh

    (Indian Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Agroforestry is widely promoted to mitigate climate change and strengthen agricultural systems; this study thus evaluates various agroforestry systems practiced in South Asian countries based on the sustainability parameters for the agriculture sector. A hierarchical model for sustainable development in agriculture is formulated considering four criteria, twenty sub-criteria, and seven alternatives. Four pillars of sustainability, namely economic, environmental, social, and human, have been considered as the criteria in this study. The proposed model is evaluated using the multi-criterion decision-making technique fuzzy analytical hierarchical process (FAHP). The investigation of the results shows that environmental and economic criterion holds the utmost value implying the need to consider both ecology and economy while formulating a sustainable system. Among the sub-criteria, farm income, timber produce, watershed protection, and carbon sequestration obtained the highest weightage. Alley cropping system and silvopastoral system have been identified to be the most sustainable agroforestry system among the considered alternatives; as they are found to possess immense potential to boost farm income and transform the animal husbandry sector, respectively. The findings of this study will assist stakeholders such as farmers and policymakers at various levels of decision-making to formulate policies regarding the adoption, development, and promotion of agroforestry interventions. The outcomes of this study will also assist researchers working in the domain of agricultural sustainability in devising a system that is sustainable, taking into account the key attributes identified in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Shubhendu Singh & Gaurvendra Singh, 2024. "Agroforestry for Sustainable Development: Assessing Frameworks to Drive Agricultural Sector Growth," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 22281-22317, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03551-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03551-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03551-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03551-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanan Ali Alrteimei & Zulfa Hanan Ash’aari & Farrah Melissa Muharram, 2022. "Last Decade Assessment of the Impacts of Regional Climate Change on Crop Yield Variations in the Mediterranean Region," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Singh, M.P. & Bhojvaid, P.P. & de Jong, Wil & Ashraf, J. & Reddy, S.R., 2017. "Forest transition and socio-economic development in India and their implications for forest transition theory," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 65-71.
    3. Cheng, Ching-Hsue, 1997. "Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 343-350, January.
    4. Chiara Falco & Marzio Galeotti & Alessandro Olper, 2018. "Climate change and Migration: Is Agriculture the Main Channel?," IEFE Working Papers 100, IEFE, Center for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    5. Leontitsis, Alexandros & Pagge, Jenny, 2007. "A simulation approach on Cronbach's alpha statistical significance," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 73(5), pages 336-340.
    6. Rhyllary Coelho e Silva & Ricardo de Siqueira Camargo & Gabriel da Silva Medina & Mariana Gatti & Eva Sevigne-Itoiz & Lorenzo Di Lucia & Onesmus N. Mwabonje, 2022. "Fashion Market Niches for Organic Agroforestry Cotton: Market Potential for Promoting Sustainable Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Tamoor Azam & Songjiang Wang & Muhammad Mohsin & Muhammad Nazam & Muhammad Hashim & Sajjad Ahmad Baig & Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman, 2021. "Does Stakeholder Pressure Matters in Adopting Sustainable Supply Chain Initiatives? Insights from Agro-Based Processing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-30, June.
    8. Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi & Ali Saeed Almuflih & Janpriy Sharma & Mohit Tyagi & Shubhendu Singh & Naif Almakayeel, 2022. "Assessment of the Climate-Smart Agriculture Interventions towards the Avenues of Sustainable Production–Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Dalemans, Floris & Muys, Bart & Maertens, Miet, 2019. "Adoption Constraints for Small-scale Agroforestry-based Biofuel Systems in India," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 27-39.
    10. Dhyani, S.K. & Samra, J.S. & Ajit & Handa, A.K. & Uma, 2007. "Forestry to Support Increased Agricultural Production: Focus on Employment Generation and Rural Development," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 20(2).
    11. Kim, Juhan & Lee, Jungbae & Kim, BumChoong & Kim, Jinsoo, 2019. "Raw material criticality assessment with weighted indicators: An application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 225-233.
    12. Stephen Polasky & Kathleen Segerson, 2009. "Integrating Ecology and Economics in the Study of Ecosystem Services: Some Lessons Learned," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 1(1), pages 409-434, September.
    13. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    14. Staton, Tom & Breeze, Tom D. & Walters, Richard J. & Smith, Jo & Girling, Robbie D., 2022. "Productivity, biodiversity trade-offs, and farm income in an agroforestry versus an arable system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Priyadarshini, Priya & Abhilash, Purushothaman Chirakkuzhyil, 2020. "Policy recommendations for enabling transition towards sustainable agriculture in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    16. Olper, A. & Falco, C. & Galeotti, M., 2018. "Climate Change, Agriculture and Migration: Is there a Causal Relationship ?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277488, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Gaurvendra Singh & Yash Daultani & Rajendra Sahu, 2022. "Investigating the barriers to growth in the Indian food processing sector," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(2), pages 441-459, June.
    18. Meyer-Aurich, Andreas & Schattauer, Alexander & Hellebrand, Hans Jürgen & Klauss, Hilde & Plöchl, Matthias & Berg, Werner, 2012. "Impact of uncertainties on greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biogas production from agricultural resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 277-284.
    19. Notenbaert, An & Pfeifer, Catherine & Silvestri, Silvia & Herrero, Mario, 2017. "Targeting, out-scaling and prioritising climate-smart interventions in agricultural systems: Lessons from applying a generic framework to the livestock sector in sub-Saharan Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 153-162.
    20. Amadu, Festus O. & Miller, Daniel C. & McNamara, Paul E., 2020. "Agroforestry as a pathway to agricultural yield impacts in climate-smart agriculture investments: Evidence from southern Malawi," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    21. Phimmavong, Somvang & Maraseni, Tek Narayan & Keenan, Rodney J. & Cockfield, Geoff, 2019. "Financial returns from collaborative investment models of Eucalyptus agroforestry plantations in Lao PDR," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    22. Weck, M. & Klocke, F. & Schell, H. & Ruenauver, E., 1997. "Evaluating alternative production cycles using the extended fuzzy AHP method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 351-366, July.
    23. T. W. Crowther & H. B. Glick & K. R. Covey & C. Bettigole & D. S. Maynard & S. M. Thomas & J. R. Smith & G. Hintler & M. C. Duguid & G. Amatulli & M.-N. Tuanmu & W. Jetz & C. Salas & C. Stam & D. Piot, 2015. "Mapping tree density at a global scale," Nature, Nature, vol. 525(7568), pages 201-205, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Savastano & Altaf Hussain Samo & Nisar Ahmed Channa & Carlo Amendola, 2022. "Toward a Conceptual Framework to Foster Green Entrepreneurship Growth in the Agriculture Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    3. Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebeci, Ufuk & Ruan, Da, 2004. "Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 171-184, January.
    4. Juhan Kim & Jinsoo Kim, 2018. "Optimal Portfolio for LNG Importation in Korea Using a Two-Step Portfolio Model and a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Łuczak, Aleksandra & Kozera, Agnieszka, 2021. "A model to assess the development priorities of local administrations through the hierarchy of strategic factors," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 474-492.
    6. Surendra Kansara & Sachin Modgil & Rupesh Kumar, 2023. "Structural transformation of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process: a relevant case for Covid-19," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 450-465, March.
    7. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Danilo Bertoni & Daniele Cavicchioli & Franco Donzelli & Giovanni Ferrazzi & Dario G. Frisio & Roberto Pretolani & Elena Claire Ricci & Vera Ventura, 2018. "Recent Contributions of Agricultural Economics Research in the Field of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit & Pongchanun Luangpaiboon, 2022. "An integrated FAHP–ZODP approach for strategic marketing information system project selection," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1792-1809, September.
    10. Ruchi Mishra & Rajesh Kr Singh & Venkatesh Mani, 2023. "A hybrid multi criteria decision-making framework to facilitate omnichannel adoption in logistics: an empirical case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 685-719, July.
    11. Waseem Alam & Haiyan Wang & Amjad Pervez & Muhammad Safdar & Arshad Jamal & Meshal Almoshaogeh & Hassan M. Al-Ahmadi, 2024. "Analysis and Prediction of Risky Driving Behaviors Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Machine Learning Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, May.
    12. Marius Mihai Micu & Toma Adrian Dinu & Gina Fintineru & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Elena Stoian & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Paula Stoicea & Adina Iorga, 2022. "Climate Change—Between “Myth and Truth” in Romanian Farmers’ Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Cho, Sangmin & Kim, Jinsoo & Heo, Eunnyeong, 2015. "Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to select the optimal heating facility for Korean horticulture and stockbreeding sectors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1075-1083.
    14. Jana Krejčí & Alessio Ishizaka, 2018. "FAHPSort: A Fuzzy Extension of the AHPSort Method," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1119-1145, July.
    15. Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Rozi Liliana Berevoianu & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Florina-Ruxandra Teodorescu & Dalila Stoica & Andreea Giucă & Diana Ilie & Cristina Maria Sterie, 2023. "Climate Change Impacts on Vegetable Crops: A Systematic Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Kiracı, Kasım & Akan, Ercan, 2020. "Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    17. Yun-hong Zheng & Kai Li, 2009. "The research of ecological security evaluation for mineral-resource enterprises-a case of China," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 329-341, September.
    18. Dets Igor A., 2020. "Possible Impact of Global Warming and Other Factors Affecting Migration in Russia with Emphasis on Siberia," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(3), pages 111-123, September.
    19. Irina Vinogradova-Zinkevič, 2023. "Comparative Sensitivity Analysis of Some Fuzzy AHP Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-41, December.
    20. Ehsan Khanmohammadi & Maryam Azizi & HamidReza Talaie & Fatih Ecer & Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, 2024. "A novel hybrid decision-making framework based on modified fuzzy analytic network process and fuzzy best–worst method," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1-32, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03551-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.