IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i5d10.1007_s10668-023-04141-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risks assessment on island micro-grids construction schemes employing a fuzzy-MCDM framework

Author

Listed:
  • Haoran Zhao

    (Beijing Information Science & Technology University)

  • Sen Guo

    (North China Electric Power University)

Abstract

Considering about the particular exterior environment of islands, stability energy supply is difficult to ensure. Since islands own abundant renewable energy resources (RESs), building island micro-grids (IMGs) to make sufficient use of RESs is an effective and applicable way to solve the energy supply problem. Nevertheless, the complicated island environment always brings great risks for IMGs construction. Hence, it is of great significance to conduct risks assessment on IMGs construction schemes to select the optimal one with the lowest risks applied in IMGs construction. Firstly, the risks assessment indicator system is established from economic risks, environmental risks, technological risks, management risks, and political risks dimensions containing 13 sub-criteria and preference values of sub-criteria with regard to schemes are identified by the fuzzy theory. Then, a novel integrated weighting approach integrating objective weights calculated by the anti-entropy weight (AEW) approach and subjective weights identified by the best–worst method (BWM) followed the rule of moment estimation is proposed. Afterward, the CPT combined with fuzzy theory is employed to calculate the hybrid prospect values of schemes. Four IMGs construction schemes are utilized to conduct case analysis and results illustrate that initial investment cost, policy and laws instability, and renewable energy utilization have superior influences on selecting the optimal scheme, while marine environmental impact and natural disaster risk are the last two sub-criteria with the least integrated weights. Moreover, Scheme 4 configured with 100 kW wind turbine, 100 kW PV generator, 100 kW pumped storage, and 500 kW battery energy storage equipment is the optimal scheme with the lowest risks applicable for IMGs construction. Through the robustness discussion, the established fuzzy-MCDM framework combining fuzzy theory, the AEW, the BWM, and the CPT is validity and applicable in IMGs construction schemes risks assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Haoran Zhao & Sen Guo, 2024. "Risks assessment on island micro-grids construction schemes employing a fuzzy-MCDM framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 13185-13216, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04141-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04141-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04141-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04141-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Richard & Lam, Chor-Man & Hsu, Shu-Chien & Chen, Jieh-Haur, 2019. "Life cycle assessment and energy payback time of a standalone hybrid renewable energy commercial microgrid: A case study of Town Island in Hong Kong," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 760-775.
    2. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    3. Wang, Can & Yan, Chao & Li, Gengfeng & Liu, Shiyu & Bie, Zhaohong, 2020. "Risk assessment of integrated electricity and heat system with independent energy operators based on Stackelberg game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Smith, Cameron & Burrows, John & Scheier, Eric & Young, Amberli & Smith, Jessica & Young, Tiffany & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2015. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Thai Island's diesel/PV/wind hybrid microgrid," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 85-100.
    5. Obara, Shin'ya & Sato, Katsuaki & Utsugi, Yuta, 2018. "Study on the operation optimization of an isolated island microgrid with renewable energy layout planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1211-1225.
    6. Mishra, Sakshi & Anderson, Kate & Miller, Brian & Boyer, Kyle & Warren, Adam, 2020. "Microgrid resilience: A holistic approach for assessing threats, identifying vulnerabilities, and designing corresponding mitigation strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    7. Oleg Nikolaevich Dmitriev, 2019. "Anti-Entropy Resolving of Uncertainty of Estimations Within Scope of Intelligent DMSS," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 11(2), pages 48-71, April.
    8. Anestis, Anastasiadis & Georgios, Vokas, 2019. "Economic benefits of Smart Microgrids with penetration of DER and mCHP units for non-interconnected islands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 478-486.
    9. Bartłomiej Kizielewicz & Jarosław Wątróbski & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Identification of Relevant Criteria Set in the MCDA Process—Wind Farm Location Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-40, December.
    10. Haoran Zhao & Sen Guo & Huiru Zhao, 2018. "Comprehensive benefit evaluation of eco-industrial parks by employing the best-worst method based on circular economy and sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1229-1253, June.
    11. Lu, Zhiming & Gao, Yan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2021. "Evaluation of energy management system for regional integrated energy system under interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Ting, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1227-1239.
    13. Egli, Florian, 2020. "Renewable energy investment risk: An investigation of changes over time and the underlying drivers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    14. Wu, Yunna & Zhang, Ting, 2021. "Risk assessment of offshore wave-wind-solar-compressed air energy storage power plant through fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    15. Zhou, Taotao & Modarres, Mohammad & Droguett, Enrique López, 2021. "Multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment: A comprehensive survey," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    16. Wu, Yunna & Wang, Jing & Ji, Shaoyu & Song, Zixin, 2020. "Renewable energy investment risk assessment for nations along China’s Belt & Road Initiative: An ANP-cloud model method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    17. Wu, Yunna & Jia, Weibing & Li, Lingwenying & Song, Zixin & Xu, Chuanbo & Liu, Fangtong, 2019. "Risk assessment of electric vehicle supply chain based on fuzzy synthetic evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 397-411.
    18. Rezaei, Jafar, 2016. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-130.
    19. Yeh, Wei-Chang & He, Min-Fan & Huang, Chia-Ling & Tan, Shi-Yi & Zhang, Xianyong & Huang, Yaohong & Li, Li, 2020. "New genetic algorithm for economic dispatch of stand-alone three-modular microgrid in DongAo Island," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    20. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    21. Ilbahar, Esra & Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebi, Selcuk, 2022. "Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    22. Zhao, Haoran & Guo, Sen & Zhao, Huiru, 2019. "Comprehensive assessment for battery energy storage systems based on fuzzy-MCDM considering risk preferences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 450-461.
    23. Barbaro, Marco & Castro, Rui, 2020. "Design optimisation for a hybrid renewable microgrid: Application to the case of Faial island, Azores archipelago," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 434-445.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nan Li & Haining Zhang & Xiangcheng Zhang & Xue Ma & Sen Guo, 2020. "How to Select the Optimal Electrochemical Energy Storage Planning Program? A Hybrid MCDM Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Mostafayi Darmian, Sobhan & Tavana, Madjid & Ribeiro-Navarrete, Samuel, 2024. "An investment evaluation and incentive allocation model for public-private partnerships in renewable energy development projects," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Lu, Zhiming & Gao, Yan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2021. "Evaluation of energy management system for regional integrated energy system under interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Ilbahar, Esra & Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebi, Selcuk, 2022. "Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    5. Gholamreza Haseli & Reza Sheikh & Jianqiang Wang & Hana Tomaskova & Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, 2021. "A Novel Approach for Group Decision Making Based on the Best–Worst Method (G-BWM): Application to Supply Chain Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Shahnazi, Rouhollah & Alimohammadlou, Moslem, 2022. "Investigating risks in renewable energy in oil-producing countries through multi-criteria decision-making methods based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets: A case study of Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1009-1027.
    7. Haoran Zhao & Sen Guo & Huiru Zhao, 2018. "Selecting the Optimal Micro-Grid Planning Program Using a Novel Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Based on Grey Cumulative Prospect Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Yana Duan & Yang Sun & Yu Zhang & Xiaoqi Fan & Qinghuan Dong & Sen Guo, 2021. "Risk Evaluation of Electric Power Grid Investment in China Employing a Hybrid Novel MCDM Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Zhao, Haoran & Guo, Sen & Zhao, Huiru, 2019. "Comprehensive assessment for battery energy storage systems based on fuzzy-MCDM considering risk preferences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 450-461.
    10. Feng, Jianghong & Guo, Ping & Xu, Guangyi & Xu, Gangyan & Ning, Yu, 2024. "An integrated decision framework for resilient sustainable waste electric vehicle battery recycling transfer station site selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    11. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    12. Mevlut Uyan & Jarosław Janus & Ela Ertunç, 2023. "Land Use Suitability Model for Grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) Cultivation Using the Best Worst Method: A Case Study from Ankara/Türkiye," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Besharati Fard, Moein & Moradian, Parisa & Emarati, Mohammadreza & Ebadi, Mehdi & Gholamzadeh Chofreh, Abdoulmohammad & Klemeŝ, Jiří Jaromír, 2022. "Ground-mounted photovoltaic power station site selection and economic analysis based on a hybrid fuzzy best-worst method and geographic information system: A case study Guilan province," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Milad Kolagar & Seyed Mohammad Hassan Hosseini & Ramin Felegari & Parviz Fattahi, 2020. "Policy-making for renewable energy sources in search of sustainable development: a hybrid DEA-FBWM approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 485-509, December.
    15. Chun-Chieh Tseng & Jun-Yi Zeng & Min-Liang Hsieh & Chih-Hung Hsu, 2022. "Analysis of Innovation Drivers of New and Old Kinetic Energy Conversion Using a Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Model in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Chinese Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-25, October.
    16. Sen Guo & Wenyue Zhang & Xiao Gao, 2020. "Business Risk Evaluation of Electricity Retail Company in China Using a Hybrid MCDM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Liu, Aijun & Zhao, Yingxue & Meng, Xiaoge & Zhang, Yan, 2020. "A three-phase fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for charging station location of the sharing electric vehicle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    18. Mi, Xiaomei & Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang & Shen, Wenjing & Lev, Benjamin, 2019. "The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what's next?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 205-225.
    19. Hashem Omrani & Arash Alizadeh & Ali Emrouznejad & Tamara Teplova, 2024. "Data envelopment analysis model with decision makers’ preferences: a robust credibility approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(3), pages 1269-1306, August.
    20. Wu, Yunna & Yong, Xingkai & Tao, Yao & Zhou, Jianli & He, Jiaming & Chen, Wenjun & Yang, Yingying, 2023. "Investment monitoring key points identification model of big science research infrastructures -- Fuzzy BWM-entropy-PROMETHEE Ⅱ method," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04141-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.