IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v373y2024ics0306261924012807.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated decision framework for resilient sustainable waste electric vehicle battery recycling transfer station site selection

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Jianghong
  • Guo, Ping
  • Xu, Guangyi
  • Xu, Gangyan
  • Ning, Yu

Abstract

This study is driven by a company engaged in renewable resource recovery. As the company's battery recycling market continuous continues to grow, the existing recycling facilities are unable to cope with the demand for sorting and storage. As a result, there is an urgent need to identify a suitable electric vehicle battery recycling transfer station (EVBRTS) to alleviate the strain on the recycling plant. The issue of electric vehicle battery recycling location has received scant attention in previous research, with a notable absence of studies focusing on EVBRTS location. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to establish an integrated decision-making framework using the best worst method (BWM) and cumulative prospect theory (CPT) to determine the optimal EVBRTS location. To achieve this goal, a panel of experts representing various sectors was assembled to formulate five primary criteria and fifteen secondary sub-criteria across the economic, social, environmental, technological, and resilience domains, drawing on existing literature and expert insights. The BWM method was employed to determine the criteria weights, followed by a ranking of the alternatives using the CPT approach. Furthermore, an integrated analytical model for the EVBRTS site selection evaluation index system was developed herein. A sensitivity and comparative analysis was carried out to demonstrate the practicality and robustness of the proposed method. A notable finding highlighted in this study is the significant impact that the order in which the expert ratings information was aggregated had on the ranking results. Undoubtedly, this study offers a fresh perspective based on resilience and sustainability for battery recycling managers to make informed strategic decisions on site selection, thereby enhancing resilience in the context of EVBRTS site selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Jianghong & Guo, Ping & Xu, Guangyi & Xu, Gangyan & Ning, Yu, 2024. "An integrated decision framework for resilient sustainable waste electric vehicle battery recycling transfer station site selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:373:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924012807
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924012807
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Jianghong & Xu, Su Xiu & Xu, Gangyan & Cheng, Huibing, 2022. "An integrated decision-making method for locating parking centers of recyclable waste transportation vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Kangye Tan & Yihui Tian & Fang Xu & Chunsheng Li, 2023. "Research on Multi-Objective Optimal Scheduling for Power Battery Reverse Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Xiaoxu Song & Shanying Hu & Dingjiang Chen & Bing Zhu, 2017. "Estimation of Waste Battery Generation and Analysis of the Waste Battery Recycling System in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(1), pages 57-69, February.
    4. Wu, Yunna & Ke, Yiming & Xu, Chuanbo & Li, Lingwenying, 2019. "An integrated decision-making model for sustainable photovoltaic module supplier selection based on combined weight and cumulative prospect theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1235-1251.
    5. Xue Dong He & Xun Yu Zhou, 2011. "Portfolio Choice Under Cumulative Prospect Theory: An Analytical Treatment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 315-331, February.
    6. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    7. Lee, Sir Yee & Hu, Jiayao & Lim, Ming K, 2021. "Maximising the circular economy and sustainability outcomes: An end-of-life tyre recycling outlets selection model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    8. Zengqiang Wang & Richard Y.K. Fung & Yan-Lai Li & Yun Pu, 2018. "An integrated decision-making approach for designing and selecting product concepts based on QFD and cumulative prospect theory," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(5), pages 2003-2018, March.
    9. Hamzeh Amin-Tahmasbi & Sina Sadafi & Banu Y. Ekren & Vikas Kumar, 2023. "A multi-objective integrated optimisation model for facility location and order allocation problem in a two-level supply chain network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 993-1022, May.
    10. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Ting, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1227-1239.
    11. M. Puviarasu & P. Asokan & S. Umar Sherif & K. Mathiyazhagan & P. Sasikumar, 2023. "A STEEP based hybrid multi-criteria decision making model for the evaluation of battery recycling plant location," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(2), pages 234-264, January.
    12. Manel Baucells & Franz H. Heukamp, 2006. "Stochastic Dominance and Cumulative Prospect Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(9), pages 1409-1423, September.
    13. James Morton Turner & Leah M. Nugent, 2016. "Charging up Battery Recycling Policies: Extended Producer Responsibility for Single-Use Batteries in the European Union, Canada, and the United States," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(5), pages 1148-1158, October.
    14. Geng, Kexin & Wang, Yacan & Cherchi, Elisabetta & Guarda, Pablo, 2023. "Commuter departure time choice behavior under congestion charge: Analysis based on cumulative prospect theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    15. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    16. Kheybari, Siamak & Kazemi, Mostafa & Rezaei, Jafar, 2019. "Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 612-623.
    17. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    18. Badri Ahmadi, Hadi & Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Rezaei, Jafar, 2017. "Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 99-106.
    19. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    20. Su Xiu Xu & Jianghong Feng & George Q. Huang & Yue Zhai & Meng Cheng, 2023. "Toward efficient waste electric vehicle battery recycling via auction-based market trading mechanisms," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(24), pages 8598-8617, December.
    21. Feng, Jianghong & Ning, Yu & Wang, Zhaohua & Li, Guo & Xiu Xu, Su, 2024. "ChatGPT-enabled two-stage auctions for electric vehicle battery recycling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    22. Lee, Hsing-Chen & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2018. "Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 883-896.
    23. Govindan, Kannan & Salehian, Farhad & Kian, Hadi & Hosseini, Seyed Teimoor & Mina, Hassan, 2023. "A location-inventory-routing problem to design a circular closed-loop supply chain network with carbon tax policy for achieving circular economy: An augmented epsilon-constraint approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    24. Kannan Govindan & Arash Khalili Nasr & Farzane Karimi & Hassan Mina, 2022. "Circular economy adoption barriers: An extended fuzzy best–worst method using fuzzy DEMATEL and Supermatrix structure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1566-1586, May.
    25. Mi, Xiaomei & Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang & Shen, Wenjing & Lev, Benjamin, 2019. "The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what's next?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 205-225.
    26. Rezaei, Jafar & van Roekel, Wilco S. & Tavasszy, Lori, 2018. "Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 158-169.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kheybari, Siamak & Javdanmehr, Mahsa & Rezaie, Fariba Mahdi & Rezaei, Jafar, 2021. "Corn cultivation location selection for bioethanol production: An application of BWM and extended PROMETHEE II," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Xiao-Kang Wang & Wen-Hui Hou & Chao Song & Min-Hui Deng & Yong-Yi Li & Jian-Qiang Wang, 2021. "BW-MaxEnt: A Novel MCDM Method for Limited Knowledge," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Chong Li & He Huang & Ya Luo, 2022. "An Integrated Two-Dimension Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Supplier Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Gholamreza Haseli & Reza Sheikh & Jianqiang Wang & Hana Tomaskova & Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, 2021. "A Novel Approach for Group Decision Making Based on the Best–Worst Method (G-BWM): Application to Supply Chain Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Wu, Qun & Liu, Xinwang & Zhou, Ligang & Qin, Jindong & Rezaei, Jafar, 2024. "An analytical framework for the best–worst method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Haoran Zhao & Sen Guo & Huiru Zhao, 2018. "Selecting the Optimal Micro-Grid Planning Program Using a Novel Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Based on Grey Cumulative Prospect Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Gao, Fei & Wang, Weixiang & Bi, Chencan & Bi, Wenhao & Zhang, An, 2023. "Prioritization of used aircraft acquisition criteria: A fuzzy best–worst method (BWM)-based approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Rezaei, Jafar, 2024. "Better decisions with less cognitive load: The Parsimonious BWM," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Lu, Zhiming & Gao, Yan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2021. "Evaluation of energy management system for regional integrated energy system under interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    10. Yuan, Jiahai & Li, Xinying & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhao, Changhong & Liu, Yuanxin, 2019. "Investment risk assessment of coal-fired power plants in countries along the Belt and Road initiative based on ANP-Entropy-TODIM method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 623-640.
    11. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K., 2021. "Empirical investigation and validation of sustainability indicators for the assessment of energy sources in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Ilbahar, Esra & Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebi, Selcuk, 2022. "Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    13. Zsombor Szádoczki & Sándor Bozóki & Patrik Juhász & Sergii V. Kadenko & Vitaliy Tsyganok, 2023. "Incomplete pairwise comparison matrices based on graphs with average degree approximately 3," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 783-807, July.
    14. Arvanitis, Stelios & Scaillet, Olivier & Topaloglou, Nikolas, 2020. "Spanning analysis of stock market anomalies under prospect stochastic dominance," Working Papers unige:134101, University of Geneva, Geneva School of Economics and Management.
    15. Zahra Mohammadnazari & Seyed Farid Ghannadpour, 2021. "Sustainable construction supply chain management with the spotlight of inventory optimization under uncertainty," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10937-10972, July.
    16. Guo, Dongmei & Hu, Yi & Wang, Shouyang & Zhao, Lin, 2016. "Comparing risks with reference points: A stochastic dominance approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 105-116.
    17. Md. Raquibuzzaman Khan & Nazia Tabassum & Niaz Ahmed Khan & Mohammad Jahangir Alam, 2022. "Procurement challenges in public-sector agricultural development projects in Bangladesh," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Hamid Reza Fazeli & Qingjin Peng, 2023. "Integrated approaches of BWM-QFD and FUCOM-QFD for improving weighting solution of design matrix," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1003-1020, March.
    19. Md. Abdul Moktadir & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra & Syed Mithun Ali & Razia Sultana, 2023. "Strategic drivers to overcome the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for ensuring resilience in supply chains," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 466-488, March.
    20. Chakraborty, Santonab & Ghosh, Sayantan & Sarker, Baneswar & Chakraborty, Shankar, 2020. "An integrated performance evaluation approach for the Indian international airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:373:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924012807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.