IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i6d10.1007_s10668-024-04491-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban integrated energy system construction plan selection: a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework

Author

Listed:
  • Haoran Zhao

    (Beijing Information Science & Technology University)

  • Sen Guo

    (North China Electric Power University)

Abstract

Urban integrated energy system (UIES) differs significantly from the park-level integrated energy system (IES) due to its proximity to residents’ daily lives and the constraints imposed by energy resources. Hence, UIES should be paid more attention on energy utilization efficiency and environment issues. Therefore, a scientific UIES construction plan should contribute more to the enhancement of economic benefit, energy utilization efficiency, and environmental protection. However, it is difficult to finding studies researching on UIES construction plan evaluation. Therefore, our study constructed a framework for selecting UIES construction plans utilizing multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). The Fuzzy-Delphi is applied to build an evaluation indicator system, considering economic benefit, energy utilization efficiency, environmental protection, and social recognition perspectives. This system consists of 9 sub-criteria. Afterward, this study introduces a unique approach to weighting by combining the objective weights determined via the anti-entropy weight (AEW) technique with the subjective weights assessed through the best–worst method (BWM), following the fundamental principle of moment estimation. Furthermore, MARCOS model is used to thoroughly assess alternative UIES construction plans by measuring the alternatives and sorting them in terms of a compromise solution. This model takes both positive and negative ideal solutions into account. Ultimately, case analysis and comparison discussion are executed to testify the applicability and robustness of the established MCDM framework. The findings reveal that energy utilization efficiency and the performance of environmental protection significantly impact the determination of the best construction plan for UIES. The MCDM framework, which integrates Fuzzy-Delphi, AEW, BWM, and MARCOS methodologies, proves to be effective and reliable in choosing the optimal UIES construction plan.

Suggested Citation

  • Haoran Zhao & Sen Guo, 2025. "Urban integrated energy system construction plan selection: a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 14223-14252, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04491-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04491-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04491-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-04491-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04491-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.