IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v239y2022ipds0360544221024981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi criteria decision-making for distributed energy system based on multi-source heterogeneous data

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan, Jiahang
  • Luo, Xinggang
  • Li, Yun
  • Hu, Xiaoqing
  • Chen, Wenchong
  • Zhang, Yue

Abstract

The distributed energy system (DES) has been regarded as a socio-technical innovation that can improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emission. Based on the construction and planning of a DES project in Henan Province, this paper aims to develop a comprehensive decision-making framework for selecting the most appropriate DES composition schemes with multi-source heterogeneous data. Thus, a new multi-criteria decision-making method based on fuzzy preference relations and improved Choquet integral is generated. Firstly, an evaluation criteria system is established from economic, technical, environmental and social dimensions, and 10 secondary criteria are presented. Secondly, based on the interval fuzzy preference relations of criteria given by experts, the iteration of weights of criteria is continued until the group consistency degree reaches the threshold. Thirdly, the deviation degree is used to transform the initial data, which include crisp values, interval numbers and linguistic terms to isomorphism data. Thereafter, the fuzzy measures are calculated using Mobius transformation coefficients and the final scores of the alternatives are obtained by means of Choquet integral, which can eliminate the overlap information between criteria. Finally, a real case is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed evaluation criteria and technique. The result shows the multi energy complementary system as the most appropriate alternative for the project, followed by the solar-air source heat pump system, fuel cell system, natural gas system, internal combustion engine system and traditional system. Conclusively, the discussion, comparative analysis and some policy implications to promote the development of distributed energy industry are given. This study not only can assist stakeholders to obtain greater benefits of the DES, but also can serve as a reference for the government towards the development of more robust regulations and policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan, Jiahang & Luo, Xinggang & Li, Yun & Hu, Xiaoqing & Chen, Wenchong & Zhang, Yue, 2022. "Multi criteria decision-making for distributed energy system based on multi-source heterogeneous data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pd:s0360544221024981
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221024981
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chicco, Gianfranco & Mancarella, Pierluigi, 2009. "Distributed multi-generation: A comprehensive view," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 535-551, April.
    2. Ahmad, Salman & Ouenniche, Jamal & Kolosz, Ben W. & Greening, Philip & Andresen, John M. & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes & Xu, Bing, 2021. "A stakeholders’ participatory approach to multi-criteria assessment of sustainable aviation fuels production pathways," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    3. Ren, Hongbo & Gao, Weijun & Zhou, Weisheng & Nakagami, Ken'ichi, 2009. "Multi-criteria evaluation for the optimal adoption of distributed residential energy systems in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5484-5493, December.
    4. Falke, Tobias & Krengel, Stefan & Meinerzhagen, Ann-Kathrin & Schnettler, Armin, 2016. "Multi-objective optimization and simulation model for the design of distributed energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1508-1516.
    5. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "Comparison of alternative decision-making criteria in a two-stage stochastic program for the design of distributed energy systems under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 709-724.
    6. Sy, Charlle L. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Ubando, Aristotle T. & Tan, Raymond R., 2016. "Target-oriented robust optimization of polygeneration systems under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P2), pages 1334-1347.
    7. Yuan, Jiahang & Luo, Xinggang & Li, Zhendong & Li, Lingfei & Ji, Pengli & Zhou, Qing & Zhang, Zhongliang, 2021. "Sustainable development evaluation on wind power compressed air energy storage projects based on multi-source heterogeneous data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1175-1189.
    8. Andiappan, Viknesh & Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Ng, Denny K.S., 2015. "Synthesis and optimisation of biomass-based tri-generation systems with reliability aspects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 803-818.
    9. Yuan, Jiahang & Luo, Xinggang & Ding, Xianghai & Liu, Chunlai & Li, Cunbin, 2019. "Biomass power generation fuel procurement and storage modes evaluation: A case study in Jilin," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 75-86.
    10. Bustos, Cristian & Watts, David & Olivares, Daniel, 2019. "The evolution over time of Distributed Energy Resource’s penetration: A robust framework to assess the future impact of prosumage under different tariff designs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    11. Wang, Zhenfeng & Xu, Guangyin & Wang, Heng & Ren, Jingzheng, 2019. "Distributed energy system for sustainability transition: A comprehensive assessment under uncertainties based on interval multi-criteria decision making method by coupling interval DEMATEL and interva," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 750-761.
    12. Papadopoulos, Agis & Karagiannidis, Avraam, 2008. "Application of the multi-criteria analysis method Electre III for the optimisation of decentralised energy systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 766-776, October.
    13. Ahmad, Salman & Nadeem, Abid & Akhanova, Gulzhanat & Houghton, Tom & Muhammad-Sukki, Firdaus, 2017. "Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable and nuclear resources for electricity generation in Kazakhstan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1880-1891.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    2. Sonal, & Ghosh, Debomita, 2022. "Impact of situational awareness attributes for resilience assessment of active distribution networks using hybrid dynamic Bayesian multi criteria decision-making approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Zhu, Mengshu & Fang, Jiakun & Ai, Xiaomeng & Cui, Shichang & Feng, Yuang & Li, Peng & Zhang, Yihan & Zheng, Yongle & Chen, Zhe & Wen, Jinyu, 2023. "A comprehensive methodology for optimal planning of remote integrated energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zhenfeng & Xu, Guangyin & Wang, Heng & Ren, Jingzheng, 2019. "Distributed energy system for sustainability transition: A comprehensive assessment under uncertainties based on interval multi-criteria decision making method by coupling interval DEMATEL and interva," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 750-761.
    2. Mardani, Abbas & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Khalifah, Zainab & Zakuan, Norhayati & Jusoh, Ahmad & Nor, Khalil Md & Khoshnoudi, Masoumeh, 2017. "A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 216-256.
    3. Perera, A.T.D. & Hong, Tianzhen, 2023. "Vulnerability and resilience of urban energy ecosystems to extreme climate events: A systematic review and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Ke, Yiming & Li, Xinying & Li, Lingwenying, 2019. "Portfolio selection of distributed energy generation projects considering uncertainty and project interaction under different enterprise strategic scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 444-464.
    5. Elkadeem, M.R. & Younes, Ali & Sharshir, Swellam W. & Campana, Pietro Elia & Wang, Shaorong, 2021. "Sustainable siting and design optimization of hybrid renewable energy system: A geospatial multi-criteria analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    6. Dongxiao Niu & Hao Zhen & Min Yu & Keke Wang & Lijie Sun & Xiaomin Xu, 2020. "Prioritization of Renewable Energy Alternatives for China by Using a Hybrid FMCDM Methodology with Uncertain Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Doukas, Haris, 2013. "Modelling of linguistic variables in multicriteria energy policy support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 227-238.
    8. Frangopoulos, Christos A., 2018. "Recent developments and trends in optimization of energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1011-1020.
    9. Àlex Alonso-Travesset & Diederik Coppitters & Helena Martín & Jordi de la Hoz, 2023. "Economic and Regulatory Uncertainty in Renewable Energy System Design: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, January.
    10. Yang, Zaoli & Ahmad, Salman & Bernardi, Andrea & Shang, Wen-long & Xuan, Jin & Xu, Bing, 2023. "Evaluating alternative low carbon fuel technologies using a stakeholder participation-based q-rung orthopair linguistic multi-criteria framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    11. Hachem-Vermette, Caroline & Singh, Kuljeet, 2022. "Optimization of energy resources in various building cluster archetypes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Zheng, C.Y. & Wu, J.Y. & Zhai, X.Q., 2014. "A novel operation strategy for CCHP systems based on minimum distance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 325-335.
    13. Pina, Eduardo A. & Lozano, Miguel A. & Ramos, José C. & Serra, Luis M., 2020. "Tackling thermal integration in the synthesis of polygeneration systems for buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    14. Zheng, Guozhong & Wang, Xiao, 2020. "The comprehensive evaluation of renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts based on VIKOR method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Gabriele Loreti & Andrea Luigi Facci & Stefano Ubertini, 2021. "High-Efficiency Combined Heat and Power through a High-Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell and Gas Turbine Hybrid System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    16. Funcke, Simon & Bauknecht, Dierk, 2016. "Typology of centralised and decentralised visions for electricity infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 67-74.
    17. Aunedi, Marko & Pantaleo, Antonio Marco & Kuriyan, Kamal & Strbac, Goran & Shah, Nilay, 2020. "Modelling of national and local interactions between heat and electricity networks in low-carbon energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    18. Haurant, P. & Oberti, P. & Muselli, M., 2011. "Multicriteria selection aiding related to photovoltaic plants on farming fields on Corsica island: A real case study using the ELECTRE outranking framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 676-688, February.
    19. Mohamed Ali Elleuch & Marwa Mallek & Ahmed Frikha & Wafik Hachicha & Awad M. Aljuaid & Murad Andejany, 2021. "Solving a Multiple User Energy Source Selection Problem Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Aman, M.M. & Jasmon, G.B. & Bakar, A.H.A. & Mokhlis, H., 2014. "A new approach for optimum simultaneous multi-DG distributed generation Units placement and sizing based on maximization of system loadability using HPSO (hybrid particle swarm optimization) algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 202-215.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pd:s0360544221024981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.