IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v156y2018icp709-724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of alternative decision-making criteria in a two-stage stochastic program for the design of distributed energy systems under uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Mavromatidis, Georgios
  • Orehounig, Kristina
  • Carmeliet, Jan

Abstract

The design of distributed energy systems (DES) is affected by uncertainty, which can render designs suboptimal. DES design is further complicated by the various decision-maker attitudes towards uncertainty, which range between pessimism and optimism. An additional important factor is the risk of extreme outcomes (e.g. high costs) in highly unfavourable scenarios. Incorporating all decision-maker attitudes towards uncertainty in DES design enables more informed design decisions under uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "Comparison of alternative decision-making criteria in a two-stage stochastic program for the design of distributed energy systems under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 709-724.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:156:y:2018:i:c:p:709-724
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218309010
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elkadeem, M.R. & Younes, Ali & Sharshir, Swellam W. & Campana, Pietro Elia & Wang, Shaorong, 2021. "Sustainable siting and design optimization of hybrid renewable energy system: A geospatial multi-criteria analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    2. Lasemi, Mohammad Ali & Arabkoohsar, Ahmad & Hajizadeh, Amin & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam, 2022. "A comprehensive review on optimization challenges of smart energy hubs under uncertainty factors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Da Li & Shijie Zhang & Yunhan Xiao, 2020. "Interval Optimization-Based Optimal Design of Distributed Energy Resource Systems under Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Yuan, Jiahang & Luo, Xinggang & Li, Yun & Hu, Xiaoqing & Chen, Wenchong & Zhang, Yue, 2022. "Multi criteria decision-making for distributed energy system based on multi-source heterogeneous data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    5. Perera, A.T.D. & Hong, Tianzhen, 2023. "Vulnerability and resilience of urban energy ecosystems to extreme climate events: A systematic review and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Niu, Jide & Li, Xiaoyuan & Tian, Zhe & Yang, Hongxing, 2023. "A framework for quantifying the value of information to mitigate risk in the optimal design of distributed energy systems under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    7. Wang, Meng & Yu, Hang & Lin, Xiaoyu & Jing, Rui & He, Fangjun & Li, Chaoen, 2020. "Comparing stochastic programming with posteriori approach for multi-objective optimization of distributed energy systems under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    8. Jing, Rui & Kuriyan, Kamal & Kong, Qingyuan & Zhang, Zhihui & Shah, Nilay & Li, Ning & Zhao, Yingru, 2019. "Exploring the impact space of different technologies using a portfolio constraint based approach for multi-objective optimization of integrated urban energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Zhou, Yuekuan & Zheng, Siqian & Zhang, Guoqiang, 2020. "Machine-learning based study on the on-site renewable electrical performance of an optimal hybrid PCMs integrated renewable system with high-level parameters’ uncertainties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 403-418.
    10. Petkov, Ivalin & Gabrielli, Paolo & Spokaite, Marija, 2021. "The impact of urban district composition on storage technology reliance: trade-offs between thermal storage, batteries, and power-to-hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    11. Karmellos, M. & Georgiou, P.N. & Mavrotas, G., 2019. "A comparison of methods for the optimal design of Distributed Energy Systems under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 318-333.
    12. Niu, Jide & Tian, Zhe & Yue, Lu, 2020. "Robust optimal design of building cooling sources considering the uncertainty and cross-correlation of demand and source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    13. Bohlayer, Markus & Bürger, Adrian & Fleschutz, Markus & Braun, Marco & Zöttl, Gregor, 2021. "Multi-period investment pathways - Modeling approaches to design distributed energy systems under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    14. Wang, Zhenfeng & Xu, Guangyin & Wang, Heng & Ren, Jingzheng, 2019. "Distributed energy system for sustainability transition: A comprehensive assessment under uncertainties based on interval multi-criteria decision making method by coupling interval DEMATEL and interva," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 750-761.
    15. Àlex Alonso-Travesset & Diederik Coppitters & Helena Martín & Jordi de la Hoz, 2023. "Economic and Regulatory Uncertainty in Renewable Energy System Design: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, January.
    16. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Ke, Yiming & Li, Xinying & Li, Lingwenying, 2019. "Portfolio selection of distributed energy generation projects considering uncertainty and project interaction under different enterprise strategic scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 444-464.
    17. Afzali, Sayyed Faridoddin & Cotton, James S. & Mahalec, Vladimir, 2020. "Urban community energy systems design under uncertainty for specified levels of carbon dioxide emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    18. Kuttner, Leopold, 2022. "Integrated scheduling and bidding of power and reserve of energy resource aggregators with storage plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    19. Zhuang, Chaoqun & Wang, Shengwei & Shan, Kui, 2020. "A risk-based robust optimal chiller sequencing control strategy for energy-efficient operation considering measurement uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    20. Pickering, Bryn & Choudhary, Ruchi, 2021. "Quantifying resilience in energy systems with out-of-sample testing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:156:y:2018:i:c:p:709-724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.