IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i9p1722-d1229366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use Suitability Model for Grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) Cultivation Using the Best Worst Method: A Case Study from Ankara/Türkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Mevlut Uyan

    (Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Konya Technical University, Konya 42003, Türkiye)

  • Jarosław Janus

    (Department of Agricultural Land Surveying, Cadastre and Photogrammetry, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Ela Ertunç

    (Department of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Konya Technical University, Konya 42250, Türkiye)

Abstract

The product of grapes with the highest added value is wine. Wine grapes play an important role in the evaluation of barren lands, where no other plants generally grow. Viticulture in Türkiye is generally conducted on small areas of agricultural land. In order to develop viticulture, it is important to determine suitable areas. This study presents a model for assessing land suitability for cultivation of grapevines ( Vitis vinifera L.) in the Ankara region (Türkiye). The aim is to provide a spatial decision support system based on geographic information system multi-criteria assessment, taking into account the perspectives of expert agricultural engineers and local product growers. In this study, 11 criteria were evaluated to determine the most suitable locations for grapevine cultivation. The best worst method was used to calculate the weights of the determined evaluation criteria. When the spatial distribution of the areas suitable for grapevine cultivation was examined from the resulting map produced, it was seen that 1879.29 km 2 (7%) of highly suitability areas, 5062.03 km 2 (20%) of medium suitability areas, 4706.20 km 2 (18%) of low suitability areas, and 8355.36 km 2 (33%) of unsuitable areas were detected. According to the results obtained, the southern parts of the study area are more suitable for grapevine cultivation. This study will be an important and useful regional guide for agricultural land use planning and the cultivation of grapevines.

Suggested Citation

  • Mevlut Uyan & Jarosław Janus & Ela Ertunç, 2023. "Land Use Suitability Model for Grapevine ( Vitis vinifera L.) Cultivation Using the Best Worst Method: A Case Study from Ankara/Türkiye," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1722-:d:1229366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1722/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1722/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ertunç, Ela & Uyan, Mevlut, 2022. "Land valuation with Best Worst Method in land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    2. Ustaoglu, E. & Sisman, S. & Aydınoglu, A.C., 2021. "Determining agricultural suitable land in peri-urban geography using GIS and Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    3. Stefano Salata & Sila Ozkavaf-Senalp & Koray Velibeyoğlu & Zeynep Elburz, 2022. "Land Suitability Analysis for Vineyard Cultivation in the Izmir Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Alon Tal, 2018. "Making Conventional Agriculture Environmentally Friendly: Moving beyond the Glorification of Organic Agriculture and the Demonization of Conventional Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Wójcik - Leń, Justyna & Postek, Paweł & Stręk, Żanna & Leń, Przemysław, 2020. "Proposed algorithm for the identification of land for consolidation with regard to spatial variability of soil quality," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Rezaei, Jafar & van Roekel, Wilco S. & Tavasszy, Lori, 2018. "Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 158-169.
    7. Kheybari, Siamak & Javdanmehr, Mahsa & Rezaie, Fariba Mahdi & Rezaei, Jafar, 2021. "Corn cultivation location selection for bioethanol production: An application of BWM and extended PROMETHEE II," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    8. Hasan Zabihi & Mohsen Alizadeh & Philip Kibet Langat & Mohammadreza Karami & Himan Shahabi & Anuar Ahmad & Mohamad Nor Said & Saro Lee, 2019. "GIS Multi-Criteria Analysis by Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA): Toward an Integrated Citrus Management Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Zhao, Haoran & Guo, Sen & Zhao, Huiru, 2019. "Comprehensive assessment for battery energy storage systems based on fuzzy-MCDM considering risk preferences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 450-461.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ertunç, Ela & Uyan, Mevlut, 2022. "Land valuation with Best Worst Method in land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    2. Przemysław Leń & Michał Maciąg & Klaudia Maciąg, 2023. "Design of an Automated Algorithm for Delimiting Land Use/Soil Valuation Classes as a Tool Supporting Data Processing in the Land Consolidation Procedure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Przemysław Leń & Klaudia Maciąg & Michał Maciąg & Justyna Wójcik-Leń & Katarzyna Kocur-Bera, 2023. "Automated Processing of Data in the Comparative Estimation of Land Value during Land Consolidation Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Christian Wankmüller & Maximilian Kunovjanek & Robert Gennaro Sposato & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Dilupa Nakandala & Yung Po Tsang & Henry Lau & Carman Ka Man Lee, 2022. "An Industrial Blockchain-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Global Freight Management in Agricultural Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Mustafa Polat & Karahan Kara & Avni Zafer Acar, 2023. "Competitiveness based logistics performance index: An empirical analysis in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 24(2-3), pages 97-119, June.
    7. Sangita Choudhary & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes & Simon Peter Nadeem, 2020. "The adoption of environmentally sustainable supply chain management: Measuring the relative effectiveness of hard dimensions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3104-3122, December.
    8. Kalle Margus & Viacheslav Eremeev & Evelin Loit & Eve Runno-Paurson & Erkki Mäeorg & Anne Luik & Liina Talgre, 2022. "Impact of Farming System on Potato Yield and Tuber Quality in Northern Baltic Sea Climate Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Jocelyn Alejandra Cortez-Núñez & María Eugenia Gutiérrez-Castillo & Violeta Y. Mena-Cervantes & Ángel Refugio Terán-Cuevas & Luis Raúl Tovar-Gálvez & Juan Velasco, 2020. "A GIS Approach Land Suitability and Availability Analysis of Jatropha Curcas L. Growth in Mexico as a Potential Source for Biodiesel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Hui Wang & Jun Wang & Zailin Piao & Xiaofang Meng & Chao Sun & Gang Yuan & Sitong Zhu, 2020. "The Optimal Allocation and Operation of an Energy Storage System with High Penetration Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    11. İbrahim Halil Korkmaz & Erkan Alsu & Eren Özceylan & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber, 2020. "Job analysis and time study in logistic activities: a case study in packing and loading processes," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 733-760, June.
    12. Zhuo Chen & Kang Tian, 2022. "Optimization of Evaluation Indicators for Driver’s Traffic Literacy: An Improved Principal Component Analysis Method," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    13. Huibing Cheng & Shanshui Zheng & Jianghong Feng, 2022. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Method for Sustainable Ferry Operator Selection: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Lu, Zhiming & Gao, Yan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2021. "Evaluation of energy management system for regional integrated energy system under interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    15. Manu Sharma & Deepak Kaushal & Sudhanshu Joshi, 2023. "Strategic measures for enhancing resiliency in knowledge base supply chains: an emerging economy perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1185-1205, September.
    16. Tomasz Witold Trojanowski & Pawel Tadeusz Kazibudzki, 2021. "Prospects and Constraints of Sustainable Marketing Mix Development for Poland’s High-Energy Consumer Goods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    17. Ulutaş Alptekin & Karaköy Çağatay, 2019. "An analysis of the logistics performance index of EU countries with an integrated MCDM model," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 5(4), pages 49-69, December.
    18. Munim, Ziaul Haque & Duru, Okan & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2022. "Transhipment port's competitiveness forecasting using analytic network process modelling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 70-82.
    19. Nan Li & Haining Zhang & Xiangcheng Zhang & Xue Ma & Sen Guo, 2020. "How to Select the Optimal Electrochemical Energy Storage Planning Program? A Hybrid MCDM Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Chong Li & He Huang & Ya Luo, 2022. "An Integrated Two-Dimension Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Supplier Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1722-:d:1229366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.