IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i2d10.1007_s10668-023-04036-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing sustainability of food supply chains by using a novel method integrating group multi-criteria decision-making and interval Type-2 fuzzy set

Author

Listed:
  • Ebrahim Sharifi

    (Toronto Metropolitan University)

  • Saman Hassanzadeh Amin

    (Toronto Metropolitan University)

  • Liping Fang

    (Toronto Metropolitan University)

Abstract

A framework is required to assess the current sustainability status of food supply chains (FSCs) and identify the weak aspects. This paper proposes a novel method integrating group multi-criteria decision-making and interval Type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy (IT2TrF) set to develop a sustainability index for FSCs. A food company and five industry experts are selected to participate in a case study to demonstrate the application of this method. Fifteen criteria and 33 sub-criteria related to the FSC are identified based on the available literature and the opinions of the participating experts. The company’s performance in terms of sub-criteria is obtained using the Bonferroni mean operator to aggregate the judgment of a group of experts. The best–worst decision-making method is applied to determine an expert’s weights of criteria and sub-criteria. Due to the existence of qualitative criteria, sub-criteria, and incomplete information in experts’ judgment, an IT2TrF set-based approach is utilized to obtain the overall sustainability index. The Euclidean distance measure is applied to determine the sustainability status through the entire FSC based on the IT2TrF calculations, and the FSC sustainability index is obtained. The case study results indicated a “very sustainable” sustainability status. Also, using the ranking score method and threshold analysis, nine weak points are identified, including efficiency, agility, professional development, modes of transportation, time utilization, equal opportunities, health and prosperity. In addition, improvement measures are suggested for each weak point. Finally, comparative analyses with other cases are carried out to validate the results. The results confirm the efficiency of the proposed model and its ability to include more levels of uncertainty than the conventional fuzzy approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Ebrahim Sharifi & Saman Hassanzadeh Amin & Liping Fang, 2025. "Assessing sustainability of food supply chains by using a novel method integrating group multi-criteria decision-making and interval Type-2 fuzzy set," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 3665-3705, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04036-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04036-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04036-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04036-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Luthra, Sunil & Rich, Nick & Kumar, Divesh & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Enablers to implement sustainable initiatives in agri-food supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 379-393.
    2. Ehsan Pourmand & Najmeh Mahjouri & Maryam Hosseini & Farzaneh Nik-Hemmat, 2020. "A Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Methodology Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets: Application to Water Resources Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(13), pages 4067-4092, October.
    3. Abdullah Yıldızbaşı & Cihat Öztürk & Deniz Efendioğlu & Serol Bulkan, 2021. "Assessing the social sustainable supply chain indicators using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods: a case study of Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4285-4320, March.
    4. Sepehr Hendiani & Huchang Liao & Morteza Bagherpour & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Audrius Banaitis & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2020. "Analyzing the Status of Sustainable Development in the Manufacturing Sector Using Multi-Expert Multi-Criteria Fuzzy Decision-Making and Integrated Triple Bottom Lines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Joseph Sarkis & Qingyun Zhu, 2018. "Environmental sustainability and production: taking the road less travelled," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 743-759, January.
    6. Simonov Kusi-Sarpong & Himanshu Gupta & Joseph Sarkis, 2019. "A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 1990-2008, April.
    7. Siddharth Shankar Rai & Shivam Rai & Nitin Kumar Singh, 2021. "Organizational resilience and social-economic sustainability: COVID-19 perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12006-12023, August.
    8. N. Aktaş & N. Demirel, 2021. "A hybrid framework for evaluating corporate sustainability using multi-criteria decision making," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15591-15618, October.
    9. Annachiara Longoni & Davide Luzzini & Marco Guerci, 2018. "Deploying Environmental Management Across Functions: The Relationship Between Green Human Resource Management and Green Supply Chain Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1081-1095, September.
    10. Gholami-Zanjani, Seyed Mohammad & Klibi, Walid & Jabalameli, Mohammad Saeed & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2021. "The design of resilient food supply chain networks prone to epidemic disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    11. Sonu Rajak & K. E. K. Vimal & Sricharan Arumugam & Jagadesan Parthiban & Swesh Kannan Sivaraman & Jayakrishna Kandasamy & Angel Acevedo Duque, 2022. "Multi-objective mixed-integer linear optimization model for sustainable closed-loop supply chain network: a case study on remanufacturing steering column," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 6481-6507, May.
    12. Sepehr Hendiani & Morteza Bagherpour, 2020. "Development of sustainability index using Z-numbers: a new possibilistic hierarchical model in the context of Z-information," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6077-6109, October.
    13. Rezaei, Jafar, 2016. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-130.
    14. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Orji, Ifeyinwa Juliet & Gupta, Himanshu & Kunc, Martin, 2021. "Risks associated with the implementation of big data analytics in sustainable supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Kumar, Aalok & Anbanandam, Ramesh, 2022. "Assessment of environmental and social sustainability performance of the freight transportation industry: An index-based approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 43-60.
    3. Priyanshu Kumar Singh & R. Maheswaran, 2024. "Analysis of social barriers to sustainable innovation and digitisation in supply chain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 5223-5248, February.
    4. Shih-Chia Chang & Ming-Tsang Lu & Mei-Jen Chen & Li-Hua Huang, 2021. "Evaluating the Application of CSR in the High-Tech Industry during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Roya Ghamari & Mohammad Mahdavi-Mazdeh & Seyed Farid Ghannadpour, 2022. "Resilient and sustainable supplier selection via a new framework: a case study from the steel industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 10403-10441, August.
    6. Sadia Samar Ali & Rajbir Kaur & Shahbaz Khan, 2023. "Evaluating sustainability initiatives in warehouse for measuring sustainability performance: an emerging economy perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 461-500, May.
    7. Mohammadi, Majid & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Conor McDaid & Amir Hossein Azadnia & George Onofrei & Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, 2024. "Industry readiness measurement for circular supply chain implementation: an Irish dairy industry perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 477-522, November.
    9. James J. H. Liou & Perry C. Y. Liu & Huai-Wei Lo, 2020. "A Failure Mode Assessment Model Based on Neutrosophic Logic for Switched-Mode Power Supply Risk Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    12. Ravindra Singh Saluja & Varinder Singh, 2023. "Attribute-based characterization, coding, and selection of joining processes using a novel MADM approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(2), pages 616-655, June.
    13. Junli Zhang & Guoteng Wang & Zheng Xu & Zheren Zhang, 2022. "A Comprehensive Evaluation Method and Strengthening Measures for AC/DC Hybrid Power Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & Siamak Kheybari, 2023. "Evaluating the critical success factors for maintenance management in agro-industries using multi-criteria decision-making techniques," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 949-968, June.
    15. Yossi Hadad & Baruch Keren & Dima Alberg, 2023. "An Expert System for Ranking and Matching Electric Vehicles to Customer Specifications and Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Vieira, Fabiana C. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Govindan, Kannan & Ferreira, Neuza C.M.Q.F. & Banaitis, Audrius, 2022. "Measuring urban digitalization using cognitive mapping and the best worst method (BWM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Besharati Fard, Moein & Moradian, Parisa & Emarati, Mohammadreza & Ebadi, Mehdi & Gholamzadeh Chofreh, Abdoulmohammad & Klemeŝ, Jiří Jaromír, 2022. "Ground-mounted photovoltaic power station site selection and economic analysis based on a hybrid fuzzy best-worst method and geographic information system: A case study Guilan province," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Aleksandar Aleksić & Danijela Tadić, 2023. "Industrial and Management Applications of Type-2 Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Techniques Extended with Type-2 Fuzzy Sets from 2013 to 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    19. Negin Salimi & Jafar Rezaei, 2016. "Measuring efficiency of university-industry Ph.D. projects using best worst method," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1911-1938, December.
    20. Chun-Chieh Tseng & Jun-Yi Zeng & Min-Liang Hsieh & Chih-Hung Hsu, 2022. "Analysis of Innovation Drivers of New and Old Kinetic Energy Conversion Using a Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Model in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Chinese Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-25, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04036-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.