IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v23y2021i10d10.1007_s10668-021-01311-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hybrid framework for evaluating corporate sustainability using multi-criteria decision making

Author

Listed:
  • N. Aktaş

    (Kayseri University)

  • N. Demirel

    (Kayseri University)

Abstract

Firms have to improve sustainable processes and carry out performance measurement in today’s competitive environment as well as optimize their business processes. Corporate sustainability which is the definition of sustainable development on the business scale not only focuses on corporates’ profitability, but also takes into account the environmental and social improvements. In this study, an approach based on a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method is proposed in order to help firms to evaluate the degree of achieving their economic, environmental, and social goals. Entropy method is used to find out criteria weightings, and then VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje), TOPSIS (the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), and MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) methods are implemented with the help of the weights obtained to define performance ranking of alternative sustainability reports. Lastly, a combined ranking is obtained by utilizing the three rankings of the mentioned methods via the Borda count method, which is a data fusion technique. By performing a real case of sustainability performance evaluation of a furniture company, it is aimed to assist decision-makers in making integrated decisions for their sustainability performance and improving their activities in terms of sustainability. The results show that VIKOR and MAUT have the same ranking list for economic and environmental dimensions, whereas they produce different results in terms of social dimension. According to the combined results with Borda count method, the best and worst performance years for the economic and environmental dimensions are determined as 2018 and 2013, respectively. On the other hand, 2017 is determined as the best performance year for the social dimension with Borda count method, while 2015 is the year of the lowest performance.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Aktaş & N. Demirel, 2021. "A hybrid framework for evaluating corporate sustainability using multi-criteria decision making," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15591-15618, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01311-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01311-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01311-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01311-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chandra Prakash Garg & Archana Sharma, 2020. "Sustainable outsourcing partner selection and evaluation using an integrated BWM–VIKOR framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1529-1557, February.
    2. Lanndon A. Ocampo, 2019. "Correction to: Applying fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS technique in identifying the content strategy of sustainable manufacturing for food production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 3121-3122, December.
    3. Chen, Lisa Y. & Wang, Tien-Chin, 2009. "Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 233-242, July.
    4. Manvendra Pratap Singh & Arpita Chakraborty & Mousumi Roy & Avinash Tripathi, 2021. "Developing SME sustainability disclosure index for Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) listed manufacturing SMEs in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 399-422, January.
    5. Xiongyong Zhou & Zhiduan Xu, 2018. "An Integrated Sustainable Supplier Selection Approach Based on Hybrid Information Aggregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-49, July.
    6. Maria Teresa Lamata & Vicente Liern & Blanca Pérez-Gladish, 2018. "Doing good by doing well: a MCDM framework for evaluating corporate social responsibility attractiveness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 249-266, August.
    7. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2007. "Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 514-529, April.
    8. Lee, Ki-Hoon & Farzipoor Saen, Reza, 2012. "Measuring corporate sustainability management: A data envelopment analysis approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 219-226.
    9. Shen, Lixin & Olfat, Laya & Govindan, Kannan & Khodaverdi, Roohollah & Diabat, Ali, 2013. "A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier's performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 170-179.
    10. Sepehr Hendiani & Ebrahim Sharifi & Morteza Bagherpour & Seyed Farid Ghannadpour, 2020. "A multi-criteria sustainability assessment approach for energy systems using sustainability triple bottom line attributes and linguistic preferences," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7771-7805, December.
    11. Lanndon A. Ocampo, 2019. "Applying fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS technique in identifying the content strategy of sustainable manufacturing for food production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 2225-2251, October.
    12. Wang, Qi & Wu, Chong & Sun, Yang, 2015. "Evaluating corporate social responsibility of airlines using entropy weight and grey relation analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 55-62.
    13. Sheng-Hau Lin & Danyang Wang & Xianjin Huang & Xiaofeng Zhao & Jing-Chzi Hsieh & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Jia-Hsuan Li & Jia-Tsong Chen, 2021. "A multi-attribute decision-making model for improving inefficient industrial parks," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 887-921, January.
    14. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Sin-Jin Lin & Ya-Fen Lee & Yao-Chung Chang & Jui-Ling Hsu, 2013. "Construction method selection for green building projects to improve environmental sustainability by using an MCDM approach," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(10), pages 1487-1510, December.
    15. Giles Atkinson, 2000. "Measuring Corporate Sustainability," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 235-252.
    16. Amrinder Kaur & Puja Chhabra Sharma, 2018. "Social sustainability in supply chain decisions: Indian manufacturers," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1707-1721, August.
    17. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    18. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    19. Zhaojun Yang & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang & Ying Wang, 2020. "Synergy between green supply chain management and green information systems on corporate sustainability: an informal alignment perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1165-1186, February.
    20. Gholamreza Dehdasht & M Salim Ferwati & Rosli Mohamad Zin & Nazirah Zainul Abidin, 2020. "A hybrid approach using entropy and TOPSIS to select key drivers for a successful and sustainable lean construction implementation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, February.
    21. Ananda, Jayanath & Herath, Gamini, 2005. "Evaluating public risk preferences in forest land-use choices using multi-attribute utility theory," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 408-419, November.
    22. Mao, Ning & Song, Mengjie & Deng, Shiming, 2016. "Application of TOPSIS method in evaluating the effects of supply vane angle of a task/ambient air conditioning system on energy utilization and thermal comfort," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 536-545.
    23. Kavitha Shanmugam & P. Lakshmi & S. Visalakshmi, 2015. "Employing multi-criteria decision making in examining CSR initiatives," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 115-132.
    24. Suvendu Chandan Nayak & Chitaranjan Tripathy, 2019. "An Improved Task Scheduling Mechanism Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Cloud Computing," International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering (IJITWE), IGI Global, vol. 14(2), pages 92-117, April.
    25. Eugen Nicolăescu & Cristina Alpopi & Constantin Zaharia, 2015. "Measuring Corporate Sustainability Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, January.
    26. Priyanka Majumder & Mrinmoy Majumder & Apu Kumar Saha & Soumitra Nath, 2020. "Selection of features for analysis of reliability of performance in hydropower plants: a multi-criteria decision making approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3239-3265, April.
    27. Mulliner, Emma & Malys, Naglis & Maliene, Vida, 2016. "Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 146-156.
    28. Thomas Dyllick & Kai Hockerts, 2002. "Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 130-141, March.
    29. Josias Zietsman & Laurence R. Rilett & Seung-Jun Kim, 2006. "Transportation corridor decision-making with multi-attribute utility theory," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2/3), pages 254-266.
    30. Ewa Roszkowska & Marzena Filipowicz-Chomko, 2020. "Measuring sustainable development in the education area using multi-criteria methods: a case study," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(4), pages 1219-1241, December.
    31. María Carmen Carnero, 2015. "Assessment of Environmental Sustainability in Health Care Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-22, June.
    32. Hojatollah Khedrigharibvand & Hossein Azadi & Dereje Teklemariam & Ehsan Houshyar & Philippe Maeyer & Frank Witlox, 2019. "Livelihood alternatives model for sustainable rangeland management: a review of multi-criteria decision-making techniques," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 11-36, February.
    33. Pratima Bansal, 2005. "Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 197-218, March.
    34. Dianfa Wu & Zhiping Yang & Ningling Wang & Chengzhou Li & Yongping Yang, 2018. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model and AHP Weighting Uncertainty Analysis for Sustainability Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jung-Fa Tsai & Chin-Po Wang & Kuei-Lun Chang & Yi-Chung Hu, 2021. "Selecting Bloggers for Hotels via an Innovative Mixed MCDM Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Li Ling & Ran Anping & Xu Di, 2023. "Proposal of a hybrid decision-making framework for the prioritization of express packaging recycling patterns," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2610-2647, March.
    3. Azemeraw Tadesse Mengistu & Roberto Panizzolo, 2023. "Analysis of indicators used for measuring industrial sustainability: a systematic review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1979-2005, March.
    4. Hashem Omrani & Meisam Shamsi & Ali Emrouznejad, 2023. "Evaluating sustainable efficiency of decision-making units considering undesirable outputs: an application to airline using integrated multi-objective DEA-TOPSIS," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 5899-5930, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhang, Hejie & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Ye, Cheng-Zhou & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi, 2022. "Evaluating smart office buildings from a sustainability perspective: A model of hybrid multi-attribute decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Roya Ghamari & Mohammad Mahdavi-Mazdeh & Seyed Farid Ghannadpour, 2022. "Resilient and sustainable supplier selection via a new framework: a case study from the steel industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 10403-10441, August.
    3. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Audrius Čereška & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ina Tetsman & Irina Grinbergienė, 2016. "Sustainable Assessment of Aerosol Pollution Decrease Applying Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, June.
    5. Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge & Jonatan Pinkse & Lutz Preuss, 2010. "Trade‐offs in corporate sustainability: you can't have your cake and eat it," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(4), pages 217-229, May.
    6. Salamatu J. Tannor & Christian Borgemeister & Shalom D. Addo–Danso & Klaus Greve & Bernhard Tischbein, 2023. "Climate variability and mining sustainability: exploring operations’ perspectives on local effects and the willingness to adapt in Ghana," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Juin-Hao Ho & Gwo-Guang Lee & Ming-Tsang Lu, 2020. "Exploring the Implementation of a Legal AI Bot for Sustainable Development in Legal Advisory Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Zhaojun Yang & Xiaoting Guo & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang, 2021. "Contextual and organizational factors in sustainable supply chain decision making: grey relational analysis and interpretative structural modeling," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12056-12076, August.
    9. Thaís Vieira Nunhes & Enzo Viviani Garcia & Maximilian Espuny & Vitor Homem de Mello Santos & Raine Isaksson & Otávio José de Oliveira, 2021. "Where to Go with Corporate Sustainability? Opening Paths for Sustainable Businesses through the Collaboration between Universities, Governments, and Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-31, January.
    10. Tsai Chi Kuo & Chia-Wei Hsu & Jie-Ying Li, 2015. "Developing a Green Supplier Selection Model by Using the DANP with VIKOR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-29, February.
    11. Anna Dos, 2017. "Multi-criteria decision methods for CSR management – literature review," Managerial Economics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 18(1), pages 63-86.
    12. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar & Cañal-Fernández, Verónica & Antomil-Ibias, José, 2014. "Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-17.
    13. Yousaf Ali & Zain Aslam & Hammad Sajid Dar & UbaidUllah Mumtaz, 2018. "A multi-criteria decision analysis of solid waste treatment options in Pakistan: Lahore City—a case in point," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 528-543, December.
    14. Füsun Küçükbay & Ebru Sürücü, 2019. "Corporate sustainability performance measurement based on a new multicriteria sorting method," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 664-680, May.
    15. Jim-Yuh Huang & Kao-Yi Shen & Joseph C.P. Shieh & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2019. "Strengthen Financial Holding Companies’ Business Sustainability by Using a Hybrid Corporate Governance Evaluation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, January.
    16. Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge, 2011. "Beyond the Bounded Instrumentality in Current Corporate Sustainability Research: Toward an Inclusive Notion of Profitability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 325-345, December.
    17. Katarzyna Liczmańska-Kopcewicz & Paula Pypłacz & Agnieszka Wiśniewska, 2020. "Resonance of Investments in Renewable Energy Sources in Industrial Enterprises in the Food Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    18. S. J. Chang, 2016. "Sustainable Evolution for Global Business: A Synthetic Review of the Literature," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Hossein Safari & Zahra Faraji & Setareh Majidian, 2016. "Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 475-486, April.
    20. Katarzyna Liczmańska-Kopcewicz & Katarzyna Mizera & Paula Pypłacz, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development for Creating Value for FMCG Sector Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:23:y:2021:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01311-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.