IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/amsrev/v11y2021i3d10.1007_s13162-021-00219-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing and enhancing the impact potential of marketing articles

Author

Listed:
  • Elina Jaakkola

    (University of Turku)

  • Stephen L. Vargo

    (University of Hawai’i)

Abstract

Although the impact of marketing is a recognized priority, current academic practices do not fully support this goal. A research manuscript’s likely influence is difficult to evaluate prior to publication, and audiences differ in their understandings of what “impact” means. This article develops a set of criteria for assessing and enhancing a publication’s impact potential. An article is argued to have greater influence if it changes many stakeholders’ understandings or behaviors on a relevant matter; and makes its message accessible by offering simple and clear findings and translating them into actionable implications. These drivers are operationalized as a checklist of criteria for authors, reviewers, and research supervisors who wish to evaluate and enhance a manuscript’s potential impact. This article invites scholars to further develop and promote these criteria and to participate in establishing impact evaluation as an institutionalized practice within marketing academia.

Suggested Citation

  • Elina Jaakkola & Stephen L. Vargo, 2021. "Assessing and enhancing the impact potential of marketing articles," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 407-415, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:11:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-021-00219-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13162-021-00219-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13162-021-00219-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13162-021-00219-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kohli, Ajay K. & Haenlein, Michael, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Study of Important Marketing Issues: Additional Thoughts and Clarifications," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 29-31.
    2. Blocker, Christopher P. & Ruth, Julie A. & Sridharan, Srinivas & Beckwith, Colin & Ekici, Ahmet & Goudie-Hutton, Martina & Rosa, José Antonio & Saatcioglu, Bige & Talukdar, Debabrata & Trujillo, Carlo, 2013. "Understanding poverty and promoting poverty alleviation through transformative consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1195-1202.
    3. Ruth N. Bolton, 2020. "First steps to creating high impact theory in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 172-178, December.
    4. Gary L. Lilien & John H. Roberts & Venkatesh Shankar, 2013. "Effective Marketing Science Applications: Insights from the ISMS-MSI Practice Prize Finalist Papers and Projects," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 229-245, March.
    5. Manjit S. Yadav, 2018. "Making emerging phenomena a research priority," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 361-365, May.
    6. Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan, 2014. "Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 117-134, September.
    7. Hoffman, Donna L & Holbrook, Morris B, 1993. "The Intellectual Structure of Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Study of Author Cocitations in the First 15 Years of the Journal of Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(4), pages 505-517, March.
    8. Gerard J. Tellis, 2017. "Interesting and impactful research: on phenomena, theory, and writing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-6, January.
    9. Kohli, Ajay K. & Haenlein, Michael, 2021. "Factors affecting the study of important marketing issues: Implications and recommendations," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-11.
    10. John R. Hauser, 2017. "Phenomena, theory, application, data, and methods all have impact," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 7-9, January.
    11. Mark B. Houston, 2019. "Four facets of rigor," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 570-573, July.
    12. Leeflang, P.S.H. & Wittink, Dick R., 2000. "Building models for marketing decisions: past, present and future," Research Report 00F20, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    13. Stremersch, Stefan, 2021. "The Study of Important Marketing Issues: Reflections," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 12-17.
    14. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    15. Davis, Brennan & Ozanne, Julie L., 2019. "Measuring the impact of transformative consumer research: The relational engagement approach as a promising avenue," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 311-318.
    16. Emanuela Reale & Dragana Avramov & Kubra Canhial & Claire Donovan & Ramon Flecha & Poul Holm & Charles Larkin & Benedetto Lepori & Judith Mosoni-Fried & Esther Oliver & Emilia Primeri & Lidia Puigvert, 2018. "A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 298-308.
    17. Richard Makadok & Richard Burton & Jay Barney, 2018. "A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1530-1545, June.
    18. Stephen L. Vargo & Kaisa Koskela-Huotari, 2020. "Advancing conceptual-only articles in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-5, June.
    19. repec:dgr:rugsom:00f20 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Roberts, John H. & Kayande, Ujwal & Stremersch, Stefan, 2014. "From academic research to marketing practice: Some further thoughts," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 144-146.
    21. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    22. Roberts, John H. & Kayande, Ujwal & Stremersch, Stefan, 2014. "From academic research to marketing practice: Exploring the marketing science value chain," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 127-140.
    23. Steven M. Shugan, 2003. "Editorial: Defining Interesting Research Problems," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolfgang Ulaga & Michael Kleinaltenkamp & Vishal Kashyap & Andreas Eggert, 2021. "Advancing marketing theory and practice: guidelines for crafting research propositions," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 395-406, December.
    2. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    3. Jane Machin & Natalie Ross Adkins & Christina Chan‐Park & Elizabeth Crosby & Justine Rapp Farrell & Ann M. Mirabito, 2022. "Taming complex problems using the problem‐solution‐impact research process model," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1178-1219, September.
    4. Atul Parvatiyar & Jagdish N. Sheth, 2021. "Toward an integrative theory of marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 432-445, December.
    5. Stremersch, Stefan, 2021. "The Study of Important Marketing Issues: Reflections," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 12-17.
    6. Stremersch, Stefan & Camacho, Nuno & Vanneste, Sofie & Verniers, Isabel, 2015. "Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 64-77.
    7. Michael Haenlein & Mary Jo Bitner & Ajay K. Kohli & Katherine N. Lemon & David J. Reibstein, 2022. "Guest Editorial: Responsible Research in Marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 8-12, January.
    8. Beke, Frank T. & Eggers, Felix & Verhoef, Peter C. & Wieringa, Jaap E., 2022. "Consumers’ privacy calculus: The PRICAL index development and validation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 20-41.
    9. Murtaza Haider & Randall Shannon & George P. Moschis, 2022. "Sustainable Consumption Research and the Role of Marketing: A Review of the Literature (1976–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-36, March.
    10. Stremersch, S. & Winer, R.S. & Camacho, N.M.A., 2020. "Faculty Research Incentives and Business School Health: A New Perspective from and for Marketing," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2020-013-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    11. Panwar Tapish & Khan Kalim, 2022. "SAFE: The New-Age Service Marketing Mix for the New-Age Internet-Based Services," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 106-132, September.
    12. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & O. C. Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2021. "Re-institutionalizing marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 446-453, December.
    13. Abhishek Borah & Xin (Shane) Wang & Jun Hyun (Joseph) Ryoo, 2018. "Understanding Influence of Marketing Thought on Practice: an Analysis of Business Journals Using Textual and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Analysis," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 5(3), pages 146-161, December.
    14. Neil A. Morgan & Kimberly A. Whitler & Hui Feng & Simos Chari, 2019. "Research in marketing strategy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 4-29, January.
    15. Stremersch, S. & Camacho, N.M.A. & Vanneste, S. & Verniers, I.W.J., 2014. "Unraveling Scientific Impact," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-014-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    16. Julia A. Fehrer, 2020. "Rethinking marketing: back to purpose," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 179-184, December.
    17. Joern Redler & Holger J. Schmidt, 2022. "I know that I know nothing: exploring the managerial relevance of recent orientations in brand management research," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(5), pages 498-511, September.
    18. Daniele Dalli, 2014. "Mercati e competitivit? in transizione," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(4), pages 7-11.
    19. Roberts, John H. & Kayande, Ujwal & Stremersch, Stefan, 2014. "From academic research to marketing practice: Exploring the marketing science value chain," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 127-140.
    20. Zhang, Yifan & Fong, Duncan K.H. & DeSarbo, Wayne S., 2021. "A generalized ordinal finite mixture regression model for market segmentation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1055-1072.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:11:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-021-00219-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.