IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/amsrev/v14y2024i3d10.1007_s13162-024-00292-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to craft a compelling storyline for a conceptual paper

Author

Listed:
  • Kaisa Koskela-Huotari

    (Stockholm School of Economics)

Abstract

A key to successfully publishing a conceptual research paper is crafting a compelling, well-communicated storyline, while contributing new theoretical insights to the chosen field. This editorial offers a step-by-step guide for crafting such a storyline. To enhance accessibility, it employs the metaphor of a “conference room” to integrate insights from prior ‘how-to’ guides on writing conceptual research papers. Additionally, the editorial includes a flowchart to help authors in assessing whether their manuscript’s storyline is ready for submission.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaisa Koskela-Huotari, 2024. "How to craft a compelling storyline for a conceptual paper," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 14(3), pages 174-181, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:14:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-024-00292-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s13162-024-00292-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13162-024-00292-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13162-024-00292-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bård Tronvoll & Kirk Plangger, 2024. "Beacons to conceptual impact," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 14(1), pages 7-11, June.
    2. Kristina Heinonen & Tom Gruen, 2024. "Elevating conceptual research: Insights, approaches, and support," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-6, June.
    3. Kari Lukka & Eija Vinnari, 2014. "Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 1308-1338, October.
    4. Shelby D. Hunt, 2020. "Indigenous theory development in marketing: the foundational premises approach," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 8-17, June.
    5. Manjit S. Yadav, 2014. "Enhancing theory development in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-4, June.
    6. Jay B. Barney, 2020. "Contributing to theory: opportunities and challenges," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 49-55, June.
    7. John Hulland, 2020. "Conceptual review papers: revisiting existing research to develop and refine theory," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 27-35, June.
    8. Rajan Varadarajan, 2020. "Advancing theory in marketing: insights from conversations in other disciplines," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 73-84, June.
    9. Elina Jaakkola & Stephen L. Vargo, 2021. "Assessing and enhancing the impact potential of marketing articles," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 407-415, December.
    10. Christian Homburg & Danijel Jozić & Christina Kuehnl, 2017. "Customer experience management: toward implementing an evolving marketing concept," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 377-401, May.
    11. Stephen L. Vargo, 2023. "Conceptual reconciliation for clarity and impact," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(3), pages 169-172, December.
    12. Stephen L. Vargo & Kaisa Koskela-Huotari, 2020. "Advancing conceptual-only articles in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-5, June.
    13. Elina Jaakkola, 2020. "Designing conceptual articles: four approaches," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 18-26, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    2. Stephen L. Vargo, 2023. "Conceptual reconciliation for clarity and impact," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(3), pages 169-172, December.
    3. Liliana L. Bove & Thomas W. Gruen, 2023. "Lessons from the 2023 doctoral competition for conceptual articles: Identifying, nurturing, and publishing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-4, June.
    4. Vikram Kapoor & Russell Belk, 2022. "‘Pressure creates diamonds’/‘fire refines gold’: Conceptualizing coping capital," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 196-215, December.
    5. Lena V. Bjørlo, 2024. "Freedom from interference: Decisional privacy as a dimension of consumer privacy online," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 14(1), pages 12-36, June.
    6. Fan Wang & Brad D. Carlson, 2024. "Self-disclosure of content creators: A systematic review and holistic framework," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 14(3), pages 239-257, December.
    7. Atul Parvatiyar & Jagdish N. Sheth, 2021. "Toward an integrative theory of marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 432-445, December.
    8. Meier, Andrea & Eller, Robert & Peters, Mike, 2025. "Creating competitiveness in incumbent small- and medium-sized enterprises: A revised perspective on digital transformation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    9. Haoyan Li & Hui Jiang, 2024. "Stable Social Knowledge Creation to Solve the Contract Failure Dilemma in International Construction Engineering: A Liquid Crystal Metaphor," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6937-6968, June.
    10. Kendall Park & Steve Hoeffler & Kevin Lane Keller, 2023. "Marketing perspectives on CSR initiatives: Conceptual foundations and an agenda for future research," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(3), pages 277-296, December.
    11. Suvi Nenonen, 2022. "Resurrecting marketing: Focus on the phenomena!," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 174-176, December.
    12. Wolfgang Ulaga & Michael Kleinaltenkamp & Vishal Kashyap & Andreas Eggert, 2021. "Advancing marketing theory and practice: guidelines for crafting research propositions," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 395-406, December.
    13. Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key & Carol Azab, 2023. "Contours of the marketing literature: Text, context, point-of-view, research horizons, interpretation, and influence in marketing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(3), pages 232-249, December.
    14. Paolo Franco, 2023. "Older consumers and technology: A critical systematic literature review," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 92-121, June.
    15. Kennell, James & Šuligoj, Metod, 2024. "Conceptualising dark events: A new framework," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. Max Rosvall, 2024. "Space of Challenges (SOC) Framework: Problems, Issues and Dilemmas in Sustainable Housing," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 931-958, December.
    17. Dejan Glavas & Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2023. "Greening the greenwashers – How to push greenwashers towards more sustainable trajectories," Post-Print hal-03908838, HAL.
    18. Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
    19. Sophie Esmann Andersen & Trine Susanne Johansen, 2024. "The activist brand and the transformational power of resistance: towards a narrative conceptual framework," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(2), pages 140-152, March.
    20. Weidig, Jakob & Weippert, Marco & Kuehnl, Christina, 2024. "Personalized touchpoints and customer experience: A conceptual synthesis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:14:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13162-024-00292-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.