Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/s/oup/rseval.html
Content
2022, Volume 31, Issue 2
- 173-187 Assessing research excellence: Evaluating the Research Excellence Framework
by Mehmet Pinar & Timothy J Horne - 188-201 Key factors affecting the promotion of researchers of the Argentine Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET)
by María Guillermina D'Onofrio & Juan D Rogers - 202-213 Societal targeting in researcher funding: An exploratory approach
by Irene Ramos-Vielba & Duncan A Thomas & Kaare Aagaard - 214-225 The epistemic, production, and accountability prospects of social impact: An analysis of strategic research proposals
by Juha-Pekka Lauronen - 226-235 Does R&D tax credit impact firm behaviour? Micro evidence for Portugal
by Alexandre Paredes & Joana Mendonça & Fernando Bação & Bruno Damásio - 236-248 Does monitoring performance act as an incentive for improving research performance? National and organizational level analysis of Finnish universities
by Laura Himanen & Hanna-Mari Puuska - 249-256 Evaluating the Revised National Institutes of Health clinical trial definition impact on recruitment progress
by Eugene I KaneIII & Gail L Daumit & Kevin M Fain & Roberta W Scherer & Emma Elizabeth McGinty - 257-270 Predicting funded research project performance based on machine learning
by Hoon Jang - 271-287 A participatory approach to tracking system transformation in clusters and innovation ecosystems—Evolving practice in Sweden’s Vinnväxt programme
by Emily Wise & Moa Eklund & Madeline Smith & James Wilson
2021, Volume 30, Issue 2
- 141-153 The use of an impact framework to evaluate the impact of research on policy and practice: Screening questionnaires for intellectual disability
by Karen McKenzie & Aja Murray & George Murray & Rachel Martin - 154-168 Understanding and evaluating the impact of integrated problem-oriented research programmes: Concepts and considerations
by Brian M Belcher & Karl Hughes - 169-178 Gathering evidence of impact from research support services: Examining impact in the context of the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis
by Poppy Townsend & Clare Wilkinson - 179-190 Understanding collaborative interactions in relation to research impact in social sciences and humanities: A meta-ethnography
by Alexis Dewaele & Kristof Vandael & Stefan Meysman & Ann Buysse - 191-200 Transformative academic institutions: An experimental framework for understanding regional impacts of research
by María José Aranguren & Patricia Canto-Farachala & James R Wilson - 201-214 The program and policy change framework: A new tool to measure research use in low- and middle-income countries
by Karen Fowle & Brent Wells & Melissa Day & Anjali Kumar & Cameron Bess & Brian Bingham & Annica Wayman - 215-229 Proposed methodology for measuring the effectiveness of policies designed to further research
by Núria Bautista-Puig & Luis Moreno Lorente & Elías Sanz-Casado
2021, Volume 30, Issue 1
- 1-12 What are the social and scientific benefits of participating at academic conferences? Insights from a survey among doctoral students and postdocs in Germany
[Postdoctoral Researchers: Roles, Functions and Career Prospects]
by Kalle Hauss - 13-25 The effect of facilitating interdisciplinary cooperation on the research productivity of university research teams: The moderating role of government assistance
[Defining Interdisciplinary Research: Conclusions from a Critical Review of the Literature]
by Aihua Chen & Xiaoting Wang - 26-38 Evaluating socially engaged climate research: Scientists’ visions of a climate resilient U.S. Southwest
[A How-to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science]
by Gigi Owen - 39-50 Transdisciplinary research outcomes based on the Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer II initiative experience
[Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Inequalities]
by Sarah D Hohl & Sarah Knerr & Sarah Gehlert & Marian L Neuhouser & Shirley A A Beresford & Joseph M Unger & Paul A Fishman & Beti Thompson - 51-56 Quantifying the contributions technicians make to research
[‘How Can We Ensure Visibility and Diversity in Research Contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is Helping the Shift From Authorship to Contributorship’]
by Clare McLaren & Alan Dent - 57-72 Mirror, mirror on the wall: is economics the fairest of them all? An investigation into the social sciences and humanities in Vietnam
[Cash Bonuses for Peer-Reviewed Papers Go Global]
by Quan-Hoang Vuong & Anh-Tuan Bui & Viet-Phuong La & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Hung-Hiep Pham & Thanh-Hang Pham & Thi-Hanh Vu & Thu-Trang Vuong & Manh-Toan Ho - 73-89 Transforming science and society? Methodological lessons from and for transformation research
[Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-Actor Perspective]
by Katharina Hölscher & Julia M Wittmayer & Martin Hirschnitz-Garbers & Alfred Olfert & Jörg Walther & Georg Schiller & Benjamin Brunnow - 90-101 Lessons from mixed-method evaluations—An example from labor market research
[Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments]
by Christopher Osiander - 102-111 Science rules! A qualitative study of scientists’ approaches to grant lottery
[The Secret to Germany’s Scientific Excellence]
by Axel Philipps - 112-126 The role of metrics in peer assessments
[How Incentives Trickle down: Local Use of a National Bibliometric Indicator System]
by Liv Langfeldt & Ingvild Reymert & Dag W Aksnes - 127-140 Interdisciplinary knowledge combinations and emerging technological topics: Implications for reducing uncertainties in research evaluation
[Blade Runner Economics: Will Innovation Lead the Economic Recovery?]
by Seokbeom Kwon & Jan Youtie & Alan L Porter
2020, Volume 29, Issue 3
- 231-244 Determinants of quality of research environment: An assessment of the environment submissions in the UK’s Research Excellence Framework in 2014
by Mehmet Pinar & Emre Unlu - 245-262 Fast growth of the number of proceedings papers in atypical fields in the Czech Republic is a likely consequence of the national performance-based research funding system
by Jiri Vanecek & Ondrej Pecha - 263-274 Millennial researchers in a metric-driven scholarly world: An international study
by David Nicholas & Eti Herman & Hamid R Jamali & Abdullah Abrizah & Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri & Jie Xu & Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo & Anthony Watkinson & Tatiana Polezhaeva & Marzena Świgon - 275-288 Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda
by Duncan A Thomas & Maria Nedeva & Mayra M Tirado & Merle Jacob - 289-299 How to select the best: Selection procedures of innovation agencies
by Peter Biegelbauer & Thomas Palfinger & Sabine Mayer - 300-315 DARE to be different? A novel approach for analysing diversity in collaborative research projects
by Frédérique Bone & Michael M Hopkins & Ismael Ràfols & Jordi Molas-Gallart & Puay Tang & Gail Davey & Antony M Carr - 316-326 Unravelling the panel contribution upon peer review evaluation of numerous, unstructured and highly interdisciplinary research proposals
by Theodoros Baimpos & Nils Dittel & Roumen Borissov - 327-351 What effects does international mobility have on scientists’ careers? A systematic review
by Nicolai Netz & Svenja Hampel & Valeria Aman - 352-353 A superb example of policy evaluation
by Diana Hicks
2020, Volume 29, Issue 2
- 121-134 Tax incentives for R&D: supporting innovative scale-ups?
by Jessica Mitchell & Giuseppina Testa & Miguel Sanchez Martinez & Paul N Cunningham & Katarzyna Szkuta - 135-149 Introducing and testing an advanced quantitative methodological approach for the evaluation of research centers: a case study on sustainability science
by Omar Kassab & Rüdiger Mutz & Hans-Dieter Daniel - 150-157 Should we fund research randomly? An epistemological criticism of the lottery model as an alternative to peer review for the funding of science
by Baptiste Bedessem - 158-170 A participatory method to assess the contribution of agricultural research to societal changes in developing countries
by Guy Faure & Genowefa Blundo-Canto & Agathe Devaux-Spatarakis & Jean Louis Le Guerroué & Syndhia Mathé & Ludovic Temple & Aurélie Toillier & Bernard Triomphe & Etienne Hainzelin - 171-190 The role of Egyptian State Awards in changing researchers’ performance in the science and technology sector
by Bahaa Ibrahim - 191-202 Playing the fields: Theorizing research impact and its assessment
by Kate Williams - 203-214 The field-specific citation and usage patterns of book literature in the Book Citation Index
by Pei-Shan Chi - 215-230 Like-for-like bibliometric substitutes for peer review: Advantages and limits of indicators calculated from the ep index
by Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro & Ricardo Brito
2020, Volume 29, Issue 1
- 1-3 Assessing societal impact of SSH in an engaging world: focus on productive interaction, creative pathways and enhanced visibility of SSH research
by Jack Spaapen & Gunnar Sivertsen - 4-21 Methods for mapping the impact of social sciences and humanities—A literature review
by David Budtz Pedersen & Jonas Følsgaard Grønvad & Rolf Hvidtfeldt - 22-33 Who benefits from ex ante societal impact evaluation in the European funding arena? A cross-country comparison of societal impact capacity in the social sciences and humanities
by Stefan P L de Jong & Reetta Muhonen - 34-47 From productive interactions to impact pathways: Understanding the key dimensions in developing SSH research societal impact
by Reetta Muhonen & Paul Benneworth & Julia Olmos-Peñuela - 48-65 Conceptualizing the societal impact of research in terms of elements of logic models: a survey of researchers in sub-Saharan Africa
by Nelius Boshoff & Stefan P L de Jong - 66-70 Normal versus extraordinary societal impact: how to understand, evaluate, and improve research activities in their relations to society?
by Gunnar Sivertsen & Ingeborg Meijer - 71-76 Capacities, capabilities, and the societal impact of the humanities
by Eiríkur Smári Sigurðarson - 77-86 Efficiency evaluation of S&T resource allocation using an accurate quantification of the time-lag effect and relation effect: a case study of Chinese research institutes
by Weizhen Yue & Jun Gao & Weilan Suo - 87-99 Performing under ‘the baton of administrative power’? Chinese academics’ responses to incentives for international publications
by Xin Xu - 100-119 It is not all about performance: Importance of the funding formula in the allocation of performance-based research funding in England
by Mehmet Pinar
2019, Volume 28, Issue 4
- 295-303 Scholarly understanding, mediating artefacts and the social impact of research in the educational sciences
by Terhi Esko & Reijo Miettinen - 304-312 Money, morale, and motivation: a study of the Output-Based Research Support Scheme in University College Dublin
by Lai Ma - 313-325 Measuring scientific impact of fisheries and aquaculture research-for-development projects in South East Asia and the Pacific
by Kiros Hiruy & Ray Murphy & Tom Lewis & William T White & Steven W Purcell - 326-343 Developing an evaluation framework for university-driven technology-based, innovation for inclusive development (UTI4ID) projects
by L Botha & S S Grobbelaar & W G Bam - 344-354 The balancing role of evaluation mechanisms in organizational governance—The case of publicly funded research institutions
by Junwen Luo & Gonzalo Ordóñez-Matamoros & Stefan Kuhlmann - 355-369 Improving access to finance for young innovative enterprises with growth potential: Evidence of impact of R&D grant schemes on firms' outputs
by Giuseppina Testa & Katarzyna Szkuta & Paul N Cunningham - 370-382 European Research Council: excellence and leadership over time from a gender perspective
by Núria Bautista-Puig & Carlos García-Zorita & Elba Mauleón - 383-393 Do we need a book citation index for research evaluation?
by Yves Gingras & Mahdi Khelfaoui - 394-404 Using mixed methods to map vaguely defined research areas
by Lise Degn & Niels Mejlgaard & Jesper Wiborg Schneider
2019, Volume 28, Issue 2
- 1-1 Retraction: A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) “Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact”
by Brian M Belcher & Luisa F Ramirez & Rachel Davel & Rachel Claus - 109-122 Government programs for university–industry partnerships: Logics, design, and implications for academic science
by Emina Veletanlić & Creso Sá - 123-135 Making a difference in the real world? A meta-analysis of the quality of use-oriented research using the Research Quality Plus approach
by Robert K D McLean & Kunal Sen - 136-144 Building a culture of impact in an international agricultural research organization: Process and reflective learning
by Genowefa Blundo-Canto & Bernard Triomphe & Guy Faure & Danielle Barret & Aurelle de Romemont & Etienne Hainzelin - 145-157 Creating research impact through the productive interactions of an individual: an example from South African research on maritime piracy
by Nelius Boshoff & Mpho Sefatsa - 158-168 How is gender being addressed in the international development evaluation literature? A meta-evaluation
by Steven Lam & Warren Dodd & Jane Whynot & Kelly Skinner - 169-181 Field patterns of scientometric indicators use for presenting research portfolio for assessment
by Emanuel Kulczycki - 182-195 The impact of Ph.D. funding on time to Ph.D. completion
by Hugo Horta & Mattia Cattaneo & Michele Meoli - 196-201 A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) “Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact”
by Brian M Belcher & Luisa F Ramirez & Rachel Davel & Rachel Claus - 202-205 Comments to Belcher et al. 2018’s critique of Hansson and Polk 2018
by Stina Hansson & Merritt Polk - 206-208 Evaluation of research in social sciences and humanities
by Thomas Heinze & Arlette Jappe
2019, Volume 28, Issue 1
- 1-1 Introduction to special section: Keynotes from STI 2017
by Diana Hicks - 2-6 Les indicateurs sont morts, vive les indicateurs! Towards a political economy of S&T indicators: A critical overview of the past 35 years
by Rémi Barré - 7-22 S&T indicators in the wild: Contextualization and participation for responsible metrics
by Ismael Ràfols - 23-36 Multi/inter/transdisciplinary assessment: A systemic framework proposal to evaluate graduate courses and research teams
by Talita Moreira de Oliveira & Livio Amaral & Roberto Carlos dos Santos Pacheco - 37-50 Formative, embedded evaluation to strengthen interdisciplinary team science: Results of a 4-year, mixed methods, multi-country case study
by Susan Roelofs & Nancy Edwards & Sarah Viehbeck & Cody Anderson - 51-62 Challenge-led interdisciplinary research in practice: Program design, early career research, and a dialogic approach to building unlikely collaborations
by Chris Gibson & Tamantha Stutchbury & Victoria Ikutegbe & Nicole Michielin - 63-72 Referees or sponsors? The role of evaluators in the promotion of research scientists in a public research organization
by Miriam Glennie & Michael O’Donnell & Michelle Brown & John Benson - 73-83 Does counting change what is counted? Potential for paradigm change through performance metrics
by Ann Rudinow Sætnan & Gunhild Tøndel & Bente Rasmussen - 84-93 The missing link: How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system
by Jonas Krog Lind - 94-107 Understanding the use and usability of research evaluation studies1,2
by Katrin Milzow & Anke Reinhardt & Sten Söderberg & Klaus ZinöckerDeceased
2018, Volume 27, Issue 4
- 285-286 Introduction: Measuring the impact of arts and humanities research in Europe
by Claire Donovan & Magnus Gulbrandsen - 287-297 Humanities of transformation: From crisis and critique towards the emerging integrative humanities
by Sverker Sörlin - 298-308 A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research
by Emanuela Reale & Dragana Avramov & Kubra Canhial & Claire Donovan & Ramon Flecha & Poul Holm & Charles Larkin & Benedetto Lepori & Judith Mosoni-Fried & Esther Oliver & Emilia Primeri & Lidia Puigvert & Andrea Scharnhorst & Andràs Schubert & Marta Soler & Sàndor Soòs & Teresa Sordé & Charles Travis & René Van Horik - 310-322 Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey
by Linda Sīle & Janne Pölönen & Gunnar Sivertsen & Raf Guns & Tim C E Engels & Pavel Arefiev & Marta Dušková & Lotte Faurbæk & András Holl & Emanuel Kulczycki & Bojan Macan & Gustaf Nelhans & Michal Petr & Marjeta Pisk & Sándor Soós & Jadranka Stojanovski & Ari Stone & Jaroslav Šušol & Ruth Teitelbaum - 323-334 Evaluation of research in the arts: Evidence from Poland
by Kamila Lewandowska & Paweł Mirosław Stano - 335-346 Procedures and criteria for evaluating academic legal publications: Results of a survey in Switzerland
by Martin Schmied & Karin Byland & Andreas Lienhard - 347-357 Continued publications by health science PhDs, 5 years post PhD-Defence
by Lorna Wildgaard & Kim Wildgaard - 358-366 The impact of academic events—A literature review
by Thomas Trøst Hansen & David Budtz Pedersen - 367-379 Tracking research performance before and after receiving the Cheung Kong Scholars award: A case study of recipients in 2005
by Xiaojuan Liu & Mengxia Yu & Dar-Zen Chen & Mu-Hsuan Huang - 380-387 An evaluation of the National Institutes of Health Early Stage Investigator policy: Using existing data to evaluate federal policy
by Rachael Walsh & Robert F Moore & Jamie Mihoko Doyle - 388-403 Defining typologies of universities through a DEA-MDS analysis: An institutional characterization for formative evaluation purposes
by Eva M de la Torre & Fernando Casani & Marti Sagarra
2018, Volume 27, Issue 3
- 171-183 Conceptualizing and measuring performance orientation of research funding systems
by Benedetto Lepori & Emanuela Reale & Andrea Orazio Spinello - 184-195 Follow the money? How Australian universities replicate national performance-based funding mechanisms
by Peter Woelert & Lachlan McKenzie - 196-211 On the meaning of innovation performance: Is the synthetic indicator of the Innovation Union Scoreboard flawed?
by Charles Edquist & Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia & Javier Barbero & Jose Luis Zofío - 212-221 Making citations of publications in languages other than English visible: On the feasibility of a PLOTE-index
by Peter Dahler-Larsen - 222-237 The characteristics of highly cited researchers in Africa
by Hugo Confraria & Jaco Blanckenberg & Charl Swart - 238-245 The effects of listing authors in alphabetical order: A review of the empirical evidence
by Matthias Weber - 246-261 The peer-review process: The most valued dimensions according to the researcher’s scientific career
by Elizabeth S Vieira & José A N F Gomes - 262-269 Gender differences in scientific productivity and visibility in core neurosurgery journals: Citations and social media metrics
by Hajar Sotudeh & Tahereh Dehdarirad & Jonathan Freer - 270-282 The impacts of diabetes research from 31 European Countries in 2002 to 2013
by Elena Pallari & Grant Lewison & Oriana Ciani & Rosanna Tarricone & Silvia Sommariva & Mursheda Begum & Richard Sullivan - 283-283 Thinking with indicators. Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences
by Ruth Müller & Sarah de Rijcke - 284-284 To what extent is inclusion in the Web of Science an indicator of journal ‘quality’?
by Diego Chavarro & Ismael Ràfols & Puay Tang
2018, Volume 27, Issue 2
- 53-62 Semantic tone of research ‘environment’ submissions in the UK’s Research Evaluation Framework 2014
by Andy Thorpe & Russell Craig & Glenn Hadikin & Sasa Batistic - 63-72 Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective
by Carla Mara Hilário & Daniel Martínez-Ávila & Maria Cláudia Cabrini Grácio & Dietmar Wolfram - 73-81 Center of excellence funding: Connecting organizational capacities and epistemic effects
by Tomas Hellström & Leila Jabrane & Erik Brattström - 82-92 Geography of doctoral education in The Netherlands: Origin and current work location of recent PhDs from five Dutch universities
by Cathelijn J F Waaijer - 93-105 A comparative review of how the policy and procedures to assess research impact evolved in Australia and the UK
by Kate Williams & Jonathan Grant - 106-118 To what extent is inclusion in the Web of Science an indicator of journal ‘quality’?
by Diego Chavarro & Ismael Ràfols & Puay Tang - 119-131 Factors enabling and constraining research in a small, research-intensive South African University
by Jen D Snowball & Charlie M Shackleton - 132-144 Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact
by Stina Hansson & Merritt Polk - 145-156 Comparing modeling approaches for assessing priorities in international agricultural research
by Athanasios Petsakos & Guy Hareau & Ulrich Kleinwechter & Keith Wiebe & Timothy B Sulser - 157-170 Assessing impacts of agricultural research for development: A systemic model focusing on outcomes
by Ludovic Temple & Danielle Barret & Genowefa Blundo Canto & Marie-Hélène Dabat & Agathe Devaux-Spatarakis & Guy Faure & Etienne Hainzelin & Syndhia Mathé & Aurelie Toillier & Bernard Triomphe
2018, Volume 27, Issue 1
- 1-15 Prevalence and citation advantage of gold open access in the subject areas of the Scopus database
by Pablo Dorta-González & Yolanda Santana-Jiménez - 16-27 Using contribution analysis to evaluate the impacts of research on policy: Getting to ‘good enough’
by Barbara L Riley & Alison Kernoghan & Lisa Stockton & Steve Montague & Jennifer Yessis & Cameron D Willis - 28-35 Researcher mobility at a US research-intensive university: Implications for research and internationalization strategies
by Jane G Payumo & George Lan & Prema Arasu - 36-42 Research impact assessment in agriculture—A review of approaches and impact areas
by Peter Weißhuhn & Katharina Helming & Johanna Ferretti - 43-51 ‘Tracking of ideas’: A method to evaluate the integration of ideas in cross-disciplinary collaboration
by Julia M Budd
2017, Volume 27, Issue 1
- 00 Unravelling complexities of university-industry research interactions: Theanalytical power of case studies
by Robert J. W. Tijssen & Poh Kam Wong
2017, Volume 26, Issue 4
- 269-283 The impact of subsidies on researcher’s productivity: Evidence from a developing country
by Diego Aboal & Ezequiel Tacsir - 284-291 An evolving research culture: Analysis of biomedical publications from Libya, 2003–13
by Mohamed O Ahmed & Mohamed A Daw & Jennifer C van Velkinburgh - 292-301 Structured Diversity – The changing landscape of doctoral training in Germany after the introduction of structured doctoral programs
by Jens Ambrasat & Jakob Tesch - 302-315 Qualitative network analysis tools for the configurative articulation of cultural value and impact from research
by Alis Oancea & Teresa Florez Petour & Jeanette Atkinson - 316-325 Social network analysis of a scientist–practitioner research initiative established to facilitate science dissemination and implementation within states and communities
by Elizabeth M Ginexi & Grace Huang & Michael Steketee & Sophia Tsakraklides & Keith MacAllum & Julie Bromberg & Amanda Huffman & Douglas A Luke & Scott J Leischow & Janet M Okamoto & Todd Rogers - 326-336 Patterns of third mission engagement among scientists and engineers
by Niels Mejlgaard & Thomas Kjeldager Ryan - 337-348 Knowledge production at industrial research institutes: Institutional logics and struggles for relevance in the Swedish Institute for Surface Chemistry, 1980–2005
by Karl Bruno & Katarina Larsen & Thed N van Leeuwen - 349-351 Counterintuitive effects of incentives?
by Peter van den Besselaar & Ulf Sandström - 352-352 Reply to van den Besselaar and Sandström
by Jesper W Schneider & Kaare Aagaard & Carter W Bloch - 353-357 A letter on Ancaiani et al. ‘Evaluating scientific research in Italy: the 2004-10 research evaluation exercise’
by Alberto Baccini & Giuseppe De Nicolao - 358-360 Reply to the letter on Ancaiani et al. ‘Evaluating Scientific research in Italy: The 2004–10 research evaluation exercise’
by Sergio Benedetto & Tindaro Cicero & Marco Malgarini & Carmen Nappi - 361-361 Thinking with Indicators. Exploring the Epistemic Impacts of Academic Performance Indicators in the Life Sciences
by Ruth Müller & Sarah de Rijcke
2017, Volume 26, Issue 3
- 157-168 Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences
by Ruth Müller & Sarah de Rijcke - 169-180 Indicators as judgment devices: An empirical study of citizen bibliometrics in research evaluation
by Björn Hammarfelt & Alexander D. Rushforth - 181-189 Blinding applicants in a first-stage peer-review process of biomedical research grants: An observational study
by Maite Solans-Domènech & Imma Guillamón & Aida Ribera & Ignacio Ferreira-González & Carme Carrion & Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda & Joan M. V. Pons - 190-198 Evaluation for the allocation of university research project funding: Can rules improve the peer review?
by Emanuela Reale & Antonio Zinilli - 199-210 Arts and humanities research, redefining public benefit, and research prioritization in Ireland
by Andrew G. Gibson & Ellen Hazelkorn - 211-229 The relevance of knowledge transfer for universities’ efficiency scores: an empirical approximation on the Spanish public higher education system
by Eva M. de la Torre & Tommaso Agasisti & Carmen Perez-Esparrells - 230-241 Measuring field-normalized impact of papers on specific societal groups: An altmetrics study based on Mendeley Data
by Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild - 242-255 Crossing borders: A citation analysis of connections between Cognitive Science and Educational Research … and the fields in between
by Jan Youtie & Gregg E. A. Solomon & Stephen Carley & Seokbeom Kwon & Alan L. Porter - 256-268 How innovative are editors?: evidence across journals and disciplines
by Jessica Petersen
2016, Volume 25, Issue 3
- 233-234 Introduction to the special issue of research evaluation with invited papers of the 19th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, 3–5 September 2014, Leiden, the Netherlands
by Ed Noyons & Paul Wouters - 235-243 Towards an alternative framework for the evaluation of translational research initiatives
by Jordi Molas-Gallart & Pablo D’Este & Oscar Llopis & Ismael Rafols - 244-256 What happens when national research funding is linked to differentiated publication counts? A comparison of the Australian and Norwegian publication-based funding models
by Jesper W. Schneider & Kaare Aagaard & Carter W. Bloch - 257-263 Determinants of research quality in Italian universities: Evidence from the 2004 to 2010 evaluation exercise
by Sergio Benedetto & Tindaro Cicero & Marco Malgarini - 264-270 Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data
by Ad A.M. Prins & Rodrigo Costas & Thed N. van Leeuwen & Paul F. Wouters - 271-278 Humanities and social sciences in the bibliometric spotlight – Research output analysis at the University of Vienna and considerations for increasing visibility
by Christian Gumpenberger & Johannes Sorz & Martin Wieland & Juan Gorraiz - 279-291 How robust is journal rating in Humanities and Social Sciences? Evidence from a large-scale, multi-method exercise
by Antonio Ferrara & Andrea Bonaccorsi - 292-305 The heterogeneous landscape of bibliometric indicators: Evaluating models for allocating resources at Swedish universities
by Björn Hammarfelt & Gustaf Nelhans & Pieta Eklund & Fredrik Åström - 306-314 The Impact Factor as a measuring tool of the prestige of the journals in research assessment in mathematics
by Antonia Ferrer-Sapena & Enrique A. Sánchez-Pérez & Fernanda Peset & Luis-Millán González & Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent - 315-328 The development of SAGE: A tool to evaluate how policymakers’ engage with and use research in health policymaking
by Steve R. Makkar & Sue Brennan & Tari Turner & Anna Williamson & Sally Redman & Sally Green - 329-338 A national survey on small research grants and the scholarly productivity of emergency medicine physicians in Canada
by Jennifer D. Artz & Mete Erdogan & Robert S. Green - 339-346 Tracking the performance of an R&D programme in the biomedical sciences
by Nicolas Robinson-Garcia & Alvaro Cabezas-Clavijo & Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras
2016, Volume 25, Issue 2
- 119-120 Unraveling complexities of university-industry research interactions: The analytical power of case studies
by Robert J.W. Tijssen & Poh Kam Wong - 121-135 Determinants of university–industry research collaborations in Taiwan: The case of the National Tsing Hua University
by Mei-Chih Hu & Shih-Chang Hung & Hsien-Chen Lo & Yung-Ching Tseng - 136-150 Do university–industry co-publication outputs correspond with university funding from firms?
by Alfredo Yegros-Yegros & Joaquín M. Azagra-Caro & Mayte López-Ferrer & Robert J.W. Tijssen - 151-160 Torn between Academic Publications and University–Industry Collaboration
by Mei Hsiu-Ching Ho & John S. Liu & Max C.-H. Kuan - 161-169 Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review
by Sarah de Rijcke & Paul F. Wouters & Alex D. Rushforth & Thomas P. Franssen & Björn Hammarfelt - 170-183 The bibliometric indicators as predictors of the final decision of the peer review
by Elizabeth S. Vieira & José A.N.F. Gomes - 184-195 Developing internationally engaged scientists and engineers: The effectiveness of an international postdoctoral fellowship program
by Alina Martinez & Carter S. Epstein & Amanda Parsad - 196-208 Innovation capabilities in the private sector: evaluating subsidies for hiring S&T workers in Spain
by Catalina Martínez & Laura Cruz-Castro & Luis Sanz-Menéndez - 209-218 Collaboration with society: The future role of universities? Identifying challenges for evaluation
by Matilda Bölling & Yvonne Eriksson - 219-229 The citation impact of collaboration between top institutions: A temporal analysis
by Ali Gazni & Mike Thelwall - 230-231 All or nothing? Debating the role of evaluative bibliometrics in the research system
by Alexander D. Rushforth
2016, Volume 25, Issue 1
- 1-17 Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context
by Brian M. Belcher & Katherine E. Rasmussen & Matthew R. Kemshaw & Deborah A. Zornes - 18-36 Measuring diversity in disciplinary collaboration in research teams: An ecological perspective
by Arsev U. Aydinoglu & Suzie Allard & Chad Mitchell - 37-49 Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms
by Hamid R. Jamali & David Nicholas & Eti Herman - 50-61 Determining effects of individual research grants on publication output and impact: The case of the Emmy Noether Programme (German Research Foundation)
by Jörg Neufeld - 62-69 Dealing with the complexity of evaluating knowledge transfer strategies: Guiding principles for developing valid instruments
by Mathieu-Joël Gervais & Caroline Marion & Christian Dagenais & François Chiocchio & Nathalie Houlfort - 70-78 Using concept mapping to identify conditions that foster knowledge translation from the perspective of school practitioners
by Christian Dagenais & Renée Pinard & Marjolaine St-Pierre & Mélodie Briand-Lamarche & Amina Kay Cantave & Normand Péladeau - 79-93 Doctoral training and labour market needs. Evidence in Spain
by Juan Francisco Canal Domínguez & César Rodríguez Gutiérrez - 94-106 Past performance does not guarantee future results: lessons from the evaluation of research units in Portugal
by Ana Ramos & Cláudia S. Sarrico - 107-117 Which firms benefit more from being located in a Science and Technology Park? Empirical evidence for Spain
by Angela Rocio Vasquez-Urriago & Andrés Barge-Gil & Aurelia Modrego Rico
2015, Volume 24, Issue 3
- 229-241 Societal impact evaluation: Exploring evaluator perceptions of the characterization of impact under the REF2014
by Gabrielle N. Samuel & Gemma E. Derrick - 242-255 Evaluating scientific research in Italy: The 2004–10 research evaluation exercise
by Alessio Ancaiani & Alberto F. Anfossi & Anna Barbara & Sergio Benedetto & Brigida Blasi & Valentina Carletti & Tindaro Cicero & Alberto Ciolfi & Filippo Costa & Giovanna Colizza & Marco Costantini & Fabio di Cristina & Antonio Ferrara & Rosa M. Lacatena & Marco Malgarini & Irene Mazzotta & Carmela A. Nappi & Sandra Romagnosi & Serena Sileoni - 256-270 Options and limitations in measuring the impact of research grants—evidence from Denmark and Norway
by Liv Langfeldt & Carter Walter Bloch & Gunnar Sivertsen - 271-281 Defining the role of cognitive distance in the peer review process with an explorative study of a grant scheme in infection biology
by Qi Wang & Ulf Sandström - 282-292 Motivation and research productivity in a university system undergoing transition
by Ioana Alexandra Horodnic & Adriana Zaiţ - 293-311 Policy simulation of firms’ cooperation in innovation
by Almas Heshmati & Flávio Lenz-Cesar - 312-324 Tracking the development of disciplinary structure in China’s top research universities (1998–2013)
by Feng Li & Yajun Miao & Jing Ding - 325-339 Research classification and the social sciences and humanities in Australia: (Mis)Matching organizational unit contribution and the impact of collaboration
by Gaby Haddow
2015, Volume 24, Issue 2
- 91-105 Counting quality? The Czech performance-based research funding system
by Barbara Good & Niki Vermeulen & Brigitte Tiefenthaler & Erik Arnold - 106-117 Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator
by Kaare Aagaard & Carter Bloch & Jesper W. Schneider - 118-130 The impacts of research grants to community colleges. Evidence from the Technological Research Assistance Program in Quebec, Canada
by Kaddour Mehiriz & Richard Marceau - 131-145 Impact oriented monitoring: A new methodology for monitoring and evaluation of international public health research projects
by J. Guinea & E. Sela & A. J. Gómez-Núñez & T. Mangwende & A. Ambali & N. Ngum & H. Jaramillo & J. M. Gallego & A. Patiño & C. Latorre & S. Srivanichakorn & B. Thepthien - 146-157 Impact of inbreeding on scientific productivity: A case study of a Japanese university department
by Noriyuki Morichika & Sotaro Shibayama - 158-170 How the nature of networks determines the outcome of publicly funded university research projects
by Peter Teirlinck & André Spithoven - 171-180 Researcher mobility and sector career choices among doctorate holders
by Carter Bloch & Ebbe Krogh Graversen & Heidi Skovgaard Pedersen - 181-196 Research excellence and university–industry collaboration in UK science parks
by David Minguillo & Mike Thelwall - 197-212 Applying patent survival analysis in the academic context
by Danielle Lewensohn & Charlotta Dahlborg & Jan Kowalski & Per Lundin - 213-228 An assessment of the Innovation Union Scoreboard as a tool to analyse national innovation capacities: The case of Switzerland
by Dominique Foray & Hugo Hollanders
2015, Volume 24, Issue 1
- 1-3 Introduction to the special section devoted to the 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators ‘Translational Twists and Turns: Science as a Socio-Economic Endeavor’. Berlin, Germany, September 4–6 2013
by Sybille Hinze & Anthony F.J. van Raan & Emanuela Reale - 4-18 The effectiveness of policies for formal knowledge transfer from European universities and public research institutes to firms
by Franz Barjak & Nordine Es-Sadki & Anthony Arundel - 19-29 The ‘translational’ effect in medical journals: Bridging the gap?
by Marc Luwel & Erik van Wijk - 30-36 Cross-disciplinary research: What configurations of fields of science are found in grant proposals today?
by Rüdiger Mutz & Lutz Bornmann & Hans-Dieter Daniel - 37-50 How accurately does output reflect the nature and design of transdisciplinary research programmes?
by Elizabeth Koier & Edwin Horlings - 51-62 Measuring the benefits of university research: impact and the REF in the UK
by Hanan Khazragui & John Hudson