Oxford University Press
Research Evaluation
For corrections or technical questions regarding this series, please contact (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum)
Series handle: repec:oup:rseval
ISSN: 0958-2029
Citations RSS feed: at CitEc
Top item:
ISSN: 0958-2029
Citations RSS feed: at CitEc
Impact factors
- Simple (last 10 years)
- Recursive (10)
- Discounted (10)
- Recursive discounted (10)
- H-Index (10)
- Euclid (10)
- Aggregate (10)
Top item:
- By citations
- By downloads (last 12 months)
2016, Volume 25, Issue 3
- 233-234 Introduction to the special issue of research evaluation with invited papers of the 19th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, 3–5 September 2014, Leiden, the Netherlands
by Ed Noyons & Paul Wouters - 235-243 Towards an alternative framework for the evaluation of translational research initiatives
by Jordi Molas-Gallart & Pablo D’Este & Oscar Llopis & Ismael Rafols - 244-256 What happens when national research funding is linked to differentiated publication counts? A comparison of the Australian and Norwegian publication-based funding models
by Jesper W. Schneider & Kaare Aagaard & Carter W. Bloch - 257-263 Determinants of research quality in Italian universities: Evidence from the 2004 to 2010 evaluation exercise
by Sergio Benedetto & Tindaro Cicero & Marco Malgarini - 264-270 Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data
by Ad A.M. Prins & Rodrigo Costas & Thed N. van Leeuwen & Paul F. Wouters - 271-278 Humanities and social sciences in the bibliometric spotlight – Research output analysis at the University of Vienna and considerations for increasing visibility
by Christian Gumpenberger & Johannes Sorz & Martin Wieland & Juan Gorraiz - 279-291 How robust is journal rating in Humanities and Social Sciences? Evidence from a large-scale, multi-method exercise
by Antonio Ferrara & Andrea Bonaccorsi - 292-305 The heterogeneous landscape of bibliometric indicators: Evaluating models for allocating resources at Swedish universities
by Björn Hammarfelt & Gustaf Nelhans & Pieta Eklund & Fredrik Åström - 306-314 The Impact Factor as a measuring tool of the prestige of the journals in research assessment in mathematics
by Antonia Ferrer-Sapena & Enrique A. Sánchez-Pérez & Fernanda Peset & Luis-Millán González & Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent - 315-328 The development of SAGE: A tool to evaluate how policymakers’ engage with and use research in health policymaking
by Steve R. Makkar & Sue Brennan & Tari Turner & Anna Williamson & Sally Redman & Sally Green - 329-338 A national survey on small research grants and the scholarly productivity of emergency medicine physicians in Canada
by Jennifer D. Artz & Mete Erdogan & Robert S. Green - 339-346 Tracking the performance of an R&D programme in the biomedical sciences
by Nicolas Robinson-Garcia & Alvaro Cabezas-Clavijo & Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras
2016, Volume 25, Issue 2
- 119-120 Unraveling complexities of university-industry research interactions: The analytical power of case studies
by Robert J.W. Tijssen & Poh Kam Wong - 121-135 Determinants of university–industry research collaborations in Taiwan: The case of the National Tsing Hua University
by Mei-Chih Hu & Shih-Chang Hung & Hsien-Chen Lo & Yung-Ching Tseng - 136-150 Do university–industry co-publication outputs correspond with university funding from firms?
by Alfredo Yegros-Yegros & Joaquín M. Azagra-Caro & Mayte López-Ferrer & Robert J.W. Tijssen - 151-160 Torn between Academic Publications and University–Industry Collaboration
by Mei Hsiu-Ching Ho & John S. Liu & Max C.-H. Kuan - 161-169 Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review
by Sarah de Rijcke & Paul F. Wouters & Alex D. Rushforth & Thomas P. Franssen & Björn Hammarfelt - 170-183 The bibliometric indicators as predictors of the final decision of the peer review
by Elizabeth S. Vieira & José A.N.F. Gomes - 184-195 Developing internationally engaged scientists and engineers: The effectiveness of an international postdoctoral fellowship program
by Alina Martinez & Carter S. Epstein & Amanda Parsad - 196-208 Innovation capabilities in the private sector: evaluating subsidies for hiring S&T workers in Spain
by Catalina Martínez & Laura Cruz-Castro & Luis Sanz-Menéndez - 209-218 Collaboration with society: The future role of universities? Identifying challenges for evaluation
by Matilda Bölling & Yvonne Eriksson - 219-229 The citation impact of collaboration between top institutions: A temporal analysis
by Ali Gazni & Mike Thelwall - 230-231 All or nothing? Debating the role of evaluative bibliometrics in the research system
by Alexander D. Rushforth
2016, Volume 25, Issue 1
- 1-17 Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context
by Brian M. Belcher & Katherine E. Rasmussen & Matthew R. Kemshaw & Deborah A. Zornes - 18-36 Measuring diversity in disciplinary collaboration in research teams: An ecological perspective
by Arsev U. Aydinoglu & Suzie Allard & Chad Mitchell - 37-49 Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms
by Hamid R. Jamali & David Nicholas & Eti Herman - 50-61 Determining effects of individual research grants on publication output and impact: The case of the Emmy Noether Programme (German Research Foundation)
by Jörg Neufeld - 62-69 Dealing with the complexity of evaluating knowledge transfer strategies: Guiding principles for developing valid instruments
by Mathieu-Joël Gervais & Caroline Marion & Christian Dagenais & François Chiocchio & Nathalie Houlfort - 70-78 Using concept mapping to identify conditions that foster knowledge translation from the perspective of school practitioners
by Christian Dagenais & Renée Pinard & Marjolaine St-Pierre & Mélodie Briand-Lamarche & Amina Kay Cantave & Normand Péladeau - 79-93 Doctoral training and labour market needs. Evidence in Spain
by Juan Francisco Canal Domínguez & César Rodríguez Gutiérrez - 94-106 Past performance does not guarantee future results: lessons from the evaluation of research units in Portugal
by Ana Ramos & Cláudia S. Sarrico - 107-117 Which firms benefit more from being located in a Science and Technology Park? Empirical evidence for Spain
by Angela Rocio Vasquez-Urriago & Andrés Barge-Gil & Aurelia Modrego Rico
2015, Volume 24, Issue 3
- 229-241 Societal impact evaluation: Exploring evaluator perceptions of the characterization of impact under the REF2014
by Gabrielle N. Samuel & Gemma E. Derrick - 242-255 Evaluating scientific research in Italy: The 2004–10 research evaluation exercise
by Alessio Ancaiani & Alberto F. Anfossi & Anna Barbara & Sergio Benedetto & Brigida Blasi & Valentina Carletti & Tindaro Cicero & Alberto Ciolfi & Filippo Costa & Giovanna Colizza & Marco Costantini & Fabio di Cristina & Antonio Ferrara & Rosa M. Lacatena & Marco Malgarini & Irene Mazzotta & Carmela A. Nappi & Sandra Romagnosi & Serena Sileoni - 256-270 Options and limitations in measuring the impact of research grants—evidence from Denmark and Norway
by Liv Langfeldt & Carter Walter Bloch & Gunnar Sivertsen - 271-281 Defining the role of cognitive distance in the peer review process with an explorative study of a grant scheme in infection biology
by Qi Wang & Ulf Sandström - 282-292 Motivation and research productivity in a university system undergoing transition
by Ioana Alexandra Horodnic & Adriana Zaiţ - 293-311 Policy simulation of firms’ cooperation in innovation
by Almas Heshmati & Flávio Lenz-Cesar - 312-324 Tracking the development of disciplinary structure in China’s top research universities (1998–2013)
by Feng Li & Yajun Miao & Jing Ding - 325-339 Research classification and the social sciences and humanities in Australia: (Mis)Matching organizational unit contribution and the impact of collaboration
by Gaby Haddow
2015, Volume 24, Issue 2
- 91-105 Counting quality? The Czech performance-based research funding system
by Barbara Good & Niki Vermeulen & Brigitte Tiefenthaler & Erik Arnold - 106-117 Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator
by Kaare Aagaard & Carter Bloch & Jesper W. Schneider - 118-130 The impacts of research grants to community colleges. Evidence from the Technological Research Assistance Program in Quebec, Canada
by Kaddour Mehiriz & Richard Marceau - 131-145 Impact oriented monitoring: A new methodology for monitoring and evaluation of international public health research projects
by J. Guinea & E. Sela & A. J. Gómez-Núñez & T. Mangwende & A. Ambali & N. Ngum & H. Jaramillo & J. M. Gallego & A. Patiño & C. Latorre & S. Srivanichakorn & B. Thepthien - 146-157 Impact of inbreeding on scientific productivity: A case study of a Japanese university department
by Noriyuki Morichika & Sotaro Shibayama - 158-170 How the nature of networks determines the outcome of publicly funded university research projects
by Peter Teirlinck & André Spithoven - 171-180 Researcher mobility and sector career choices among doctorate holders
by Carter Bloch & Ebbe Krogh Graversen & Heidi Skovgaard Pedersen - 181-196 Research excellence and university–industry collaboration in UK science parks
by David Minguillo & Mike Thelwall - 197-212 Applying patent survival analysis in the academic context
by Danielle Lewensohn & Charlotta Dahlborg & Jan Kowalski & Per Lundin - 213-228 An assessment of the Innovation Union Scoreboard as a tool to analyse national innovation capacities: The case of Switzerland
by Dominique Foray & Hugo Hollanders
2015, Volume 24, Issue 1
- 1-3 Introduction to the special section devoted to the 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators ‘Translational Twists and Turns: Science as a Socio-Economic Endeavor’. Berlin, Germany, September 4–6 2013
by Sybille Hinze & Anthony F.J. van Raan & Emanuela Reale - 4-18 The effectiveness of policies for formal knowledge transfer from European universities and public research institutes to firms
by Franz Barjak & Nordine Es-Sadki & Anthony Arundel - 19-29 The ‘translational’ effect in medical journals: Bridging the gap?
by Marc Luwel & Erik van Wijk - 30-36 Cross-disciplinary research: What configurations of fields of science are found in grant proposals today?
by Rüdiger Mutz & Lutz Bornmann & Hans-Dieter Daniel - 37-50 How accurately does output reflect the nature and design of transdisciplinary research programmes?
by Elizabeth Koier & Edwin Horlings - 51-62 Measuring the benefits of university research: impact and the REF in the UK
by Hanan Khazragui & John Hudson - 63-77 Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University
by Björn Hammarfelt & Sarah de Rijcke - 78-89 Reception of Spanish sociology by domestic and foreign audiences differs and has consequences for evaluation
by Carla López Piñeiro & Diana Hicks
2014, Volume 23, Issue 4
- 273-284 Different views on scholarly talent: What are the talents we are looking for in science?
by Pleun van Arensbergen & Inge van der Weijden & Peter van den Besselaar - 285-297 Analysing robustness and uncertainty levels of bibliometric performance statistics supporting science policy. A case study evaluating Danish postdoctoral funding
by Jesper W. Schneider & Thed N. van Leeuwen - 298-311 The selection of talent as a group process. A literature review on the social dynamics of decision making in grant panels
by Pleun van Arensbergen & Inge van der Weijden & Peter van den Besselaar - 312-326 Measuring the opening of national R&D programs: what indicators for what purposes?
by Emilia Primeri & Emanuela Reale & Benedetto Lepori & Philippe Laredo & Maria Nedeva & Duncan Thomas - 327-340 Impacts of an interdisciplinary research center on participant publication and collaboration patterns: A case study of the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis
by Pamela R. Bishop & Schuyler W. Huck & Bonnie H. Ownley & Jennifer K. Richards & Gary J. Skolits - 341-351 Knowledge transfer from German universities into the service sector as reflected by service marks
by Ulrich Schmoch - 352-365 From outcomes to process: evidence for a new approach to research impact assessment
by Stevie Upton & Paul Vallance & John Goddard - 366-380 Evaluating project performance by removing external effects: Implications to the efficiency of research and development resource allocation
by Chia-Liang Hung & Pei-Jen Shiu - 381-381 Correction: Past performance, peer review, and project selection. Research Evaluation 18 (2009) Peter Van den Besselaar, Loet Leydesdorff
by Peter van den Besselaar & Loet Leydesdorff
2014, Volume 23, Issue 3
- 195-209 Interdisciplinarity and research on local issues: evidence from a developing country
by Diego Chavarro & Puay Tang & Ismael Rafols - 210-220 Awards before and after the Nobel Prize: A Matthew effect and/or a ticket to one’s own funeral?
by Ho Fai Chan & Laura Gleeson & Benno Torgler - 221-232 Research performance and evaluation—Empirical results from collaborative research centers and clusters of excellence in Germany
by Stefan Schröder & Florian Welter & Ingo Leisten & Anja Richert & Sabina Jeschke - 233-248 Tax revenue accruing from the commercialization of research findings as an indicator for economic benefits of government financed research
by Simon P. Forster & Stefan Seeger - 249-260 Supporting ‘future research leaders’ in Sweden: Institutional isomorphism and inadvertent funding agglomeration
by Olof Hallonsten & Olof Hugander - 261-271 The long-term influence of collaboration on citation patterns
by Ali Gazni & Mike Thelwall
2014, Volume 23, Issue 2
- 89-102 Understanding societal impact through productive interactions: ICT research as a case
by Stefan de Jong & Katharine Barker & Deborah Cox & Thordis Sveinsdottir & Peter Van den Besselaar - 103-116 The role of knowledge users in public–private research programs: An evaluation challenge
by Laurens K. Hessels & Tjerk Wardenaar & Wouter P. C. Boon & Matthias Ploeg - 117-132 Toward a methodological scheme for capturing societal effects of participatory sustainability research
by Arnim Wiek & Sonia Talwar & Meg O’Shea & John Robinson - 133-149 SEQUOIA: A methodology for the socio-economic impact assessment of Software-as-a-Service and Internet of Services research projects
by Antonella Passani & Fabiana Monacciani & Shenja Van Der Graaf & Francesca Spagnoli & Francesco Bellini & Marie Debicki & Paolo Dini - 150-165 Scientometric portrait of biochemist Santiago Grisolía: publication productivity, collaboration patterns, and citation analysis
by Gregorio González-Alcaide - 166-173 How are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature
by Lutz Bornmann - 174-182 The impact of extreme observations in citation distributions
by Yunrong Li & Javier Ruiz-Castillo - 183-194 A new bibliometric approach to assess the scientific specialization of regions
by Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Flavia Di Costa
September 2013, Volume 23, Issue 1
- 1-11 The New Zealand performance-based research fund and its impact on publication activity in economics
by David L. Anderson & John Tressler
December 2013, Volume 23, Issue 1
- 33-47 External funding, efficiency and productivity growth in public research: the case of the Italian National Research Council
by Greta Falavigna & Alessandro Manello - 48-61 Public versus private universities: Assessment of research performance; case study of the Spanish university system
by Fernando Casani & Daniela De Filippo & Carlos García-Zorita & Elias Sanz-Casado - 62-78 Exploring gender differences in patenting in Spain
by Elba Mauleón & Cinzia Daraio & Maria Bordons - 79-88 The use of academic research in public health policy and practice
by Margaret A. Lemay & Creso Sá
October 2013, Volume 23, Issue 1
- 12-20 Top cited articles in adsorption research using Y-index
by Hui-Zhen Fu & Yuh-Shan Ho - 21-32 Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review
by Teresa Penfield & Matthew J. Baker & Rosa Scoble & Michael C. Wykes
July 2013, Volume 22, Issue 5
- 337-350 Ranking academic impact of world national research institutes--by the Chinese Academy of Sciences
by F. Xu & X. X. Li & W. Meng & W. B. Liu & J. Mingers
August 2013, Volume 22, Issue 5
- 351-368 Understanding productivity changes in public universities: Evidence from Spain
by Adela García-Aracil - 369-383 Criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities: a Delphi study among scholars of English literature, German literature and art history
by Sven E. Hug & Michael Ochsner & Hans-Dieter Daniel
October 2013, Volume 22, Issue 5
- 269-271 Introducing the Special Section Theme: Recent Developments in Data Sources and Analysis for R&D Evaluation
by Juan D. Rogers - 272-284 Piloting an approach to rapid and automated assessment of a new research initiative: Application to the National Cancer Institute's Provocative Questions initiative
by Elizabeth R. Hsu & Duane E. Williams & Leo G. DiJoseph & Joshua D. Schnell & Samantha L. Finstad & Jerry S. H. Lee & Emily J. Greenspan & James G. Corrigan - 285-297 Measuring the evolution and output of cross-disciplinary collaborations within the NCI Physical Sciences--Oncology Centers Network
by Jodi E. Basner & Katrina I. Theisz & Unni S. Jensen & C. David Jones & Ilya Ponomarev & Pawel Sulima & Karen Jo & Mariam Eljanne & Michael G. Espey & Jonathan Franca-Koh & Sean E. Hanlon & Nastaran Z. Kuhn & Larry A. Nagahara & Joshua D. Schnell & Nicole M. Moore - 298-306 Beyond surveys: The research frontier moves to the use of administrative data to evaluate R&D grants
by Michele Morris & Oliver J. Herrmann - 307-315 Greatest 'HITS': A new tool for tracking impacts at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
by Christina H. Drew & Kristianna G. Pettibone & Elizabeth Ruben - 316-336 Impact evaluation of Japanese public investment to overcome market failure review of the top 50 NEDO Inside Products
by Masaru Yamashita & Yoshiko Yurugi & Sayaka Shishido & Tomonaga Yoshida & Mitsuru Takeshita
June 2013, Volume 22, Issue 3
- 187-197 Evaluating transformative research programmes: A case study of the NSF Small Grants for Exploratory Research programme
by Caroline S. Wagner & Jeffrey Alexander
March 2013, Volume 22, Issue 3
- 145-156 Bibliographic coupling and network analysis to assess knowledge coalescence in a research center environment
by Jan Youtie & Luciano Kay & Julia Melkers
May 2013, Volume 22, Issue 3
- 157-168 A study of global and local visibility as web indicators of research production
by M. R. Martínez-Torres & M. C. Díaz-Fernández - 169-178 Incorporation of Early Career Researchers within multidisciplinary research at academic institutions
by A. J. Sobey & N. C. Townsend & C. D. Metcalf & K. D. Bruce & F. M. Fazi - 179-186 Modeling the dissemination and uptake of clinical trials results
by Scott R. Rosas & Jeffrey T. Schouten & Marie T. Cope & Jonathan M. Kagan
February 2013, Volume 22, Issue 2
- 134-144 Facilitating social and natural science cross-disciplinarity: Assessing the human and social dynamics program
by Jon Garner & Alan L. Porter & Maura Borrego & Elizabeth Tran & Rita Teutonico
January 2013, Volume 22, Issue 2
- 105-117 Accountability, performance assessment, and evaluation: Policy pressures and responses from research councils
by Creso M. Sá & Andrew Kretz & Kristjan Sigurdson
December 2012, Volume 22, Issue 2
- 93-104 Competency-based assessment of academic interdisciplinary research and implication to university management
by Hiroyuki Kodama & Kenji Watatani & Shintaro Sengoku - 118-133 Types of research output profiles: A multilevel latent class analysis of the Austrian Science Fund's final project report data
by Rüdiger Mutz & Lutz Bornmann & Hans-Dieter Daniel
November 2012, Volume 22, Issue 2
- 79-92 Four types of research in the humanities: Setting the stage for research quality criteria in the humanities
by Michael Ochsner & Sven E. Hug & Hans-Dieter Daniel
December 2012, Volume 22, Issue 1
- 1-14 Knowledge exchange: A comparison of policies, strategies, and funding incentives in English and Scottish higher education
by Fumi Kitagawa & Claire Lightowler - 30-40 Applying the criteria indicators and metrics evaluation method on ICT research: The HUMBOLDT project
by Zaheer Khan & David Ludlow & Joachim Rix - 64-77 Evaluation of scientific books' publishers in social sciences and humanities: Results of a survey
by Elea Giménez-Toledo & Carlos Tejada-Artigas & Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez
November 2012, Volume 22, Issue 1
- 15-29 Agent-based simulation of cooperative innovation in R&D
by Almas Heshmati & Flávio Lenz-Cesar - 52-63 Identification of university-based patents: A new large-scale approach
by Friedrich Dornbusch & Ulrich Schmoch & Nicole Schulze & Nadine Bethke
October 2012, Volume 22, Issue 1
- 41-51 Selecting competent referees to assess research projects proposals: A study of referees' registers
by Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo & Fulvio Viel
December 2012, Volume 21, Issue 5
- 329-331 Introducing the issue theme: Rising to the challenges of R&D impact assessment
by Juan D. Rogers
October 2012, Volume 21, Issue 5
- 332-343 Understanding long-term impacts of R&D funding: The EU framework programme
by Erik Arnold - 344-353 Research on derivative effects created by Japanese national R&D projects
by Sayaka Shishido & Masaru Yamashita & Junichi Yoshida & Mitsuru Takeshita - 381-391 Assessing the effects of a collaborative research funding scheme: An approach combining meta-evaluation and evaluation synthesis
by Barbara Good
November 2012, Volume 21, Issue 5
- 354-367 Evaluating health research impact: Development and implementation of the Alberta Innovates -- Health Solutions impact framework
by Kathryn E. R. Graham & Heidi L. Chorzempa & Pamela A. Valentine & Jacques Magnan - 368-380 Program-level assessment of research centers: Contribution of Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers to US Nanotechnology National Initiative goals
by Juan D. Rogers & Jan Youtie & Luciano Kay - 392-405 Social network analysis comparing researcher collaborations in two cardiovascular cohort studies
by Matthew Eblen & Richard R. Fabsitz & Jean L. Olson & Katrina Pearson & Lindsay R. Pool & Mona Puggal & Charles Wu & Robin M. Wagner
September 2012, Volume 21, Issue 4
- 243-244 Evaluating the functioning and impacts of funding schemes. New methodological developments of indicators
by Benedetto Lepori & Emanuela Reale & Maria Nedeva - 245-256 The social construction of indicators for evaluation: Internationalization of Funding Agencies
by Emanuela Reale & Annamaria Inzelt & Benedetto Lepori & Peter van den Besselaar - 257-269 Characterizing researchers to study research funding agency impacts: The case of the European Research Council's Starting Grants
by Duncan Thomas & Maria Nedeva - 270-279 Funding programmes for young scientists--Do the 'best' apply?
by Jörg Neufeld & Stefan Hornbostel - 280-290 The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science--a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005--9)
by Truyken L. B. Ossenblok & Tim C. E. Engels & Gunnar Sivertsen - 306-318 The use of behavioural additionality evaluation in innovation policy making
by Abdullah Gök & Jakob Edler
October 2012, Volume 21, Issue 4
- 291-305 Relational arenas in a regional Higher Education system: Insights from an empirical analysis
by M. Seeber & B. Lepori & T. Agasisti & R. Tijssen & C. Montanari & G. Catalano - 319-328 Assessment of the impact of a clinical and health services research call in Catalonia
by Paula Adam & Maite Solans-Domènech & Joan M. V. Pons & Marta Aymerich & Silvina Berra & Imma Guillamon & Emilia Sánchez & Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda
August 2012, Volume 21, Issue 3
- 189-198 Funding decisions, peer review, and scientific excellence in physical sciences, chemistry, and geosciences
by Thed N. van Leeuwen & Henk F. Moed - 216-228 Integration of environmental impacts into ex-post assessments of international agricultural research: Conceptual issues, applications, and the way forward
by Jeff W. Bennett & Timothy G. Kelley & Mywish K. Maredia - 229-241 Quality and influence in literary work: evaluating the 'educated imagination'
by Alesia Zuccala
June 2012, Volume 21, Issue 3
- 199-203 Research assessment and monetary rewards: the overemphasized impact factor in China
by Ju-fang Shao & Hui-yun Shen
July 2012, Volume 21, Issue 3
- 167-182 The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe
by Jakob Edler & Martin Berger & Michael Dinges & Abdullah Gök - 183-188 An Integrated Impact Indicator: A new definition of 'Impact' with policy relevance
by Caroline S. Wagner & Loet Leydesdorff - 204-215 Co-authored research publications and strategic analysis of public--private collaboration
by Robert J. W. Tijssen
March 2012, Volume 21, Issue 2
- 89-104 Assessing research network and disciplinary engagement changes induced by an NSF program
by Jon G. Garner & Alan L. Porter & Nils C. Newman & Todd A. Crowl - 105-112 Public gains from entrepreneurial research: Inferences about the economic value of public support of the Small Business Innovation Research program
by Stuart D. Allen & Stephen K. Layson & Albert N. Link
February 2012, Volume 21, Issue 2
- 87-88 The role of references in scientific papers: Cited papers as objects of research
by Marek Kosmulski
May 2012, Volume 21, Issue 2
- 126-135 Cyclical long-term development of complex technologies--Premature expectations in nanotechnology?-super-†
by Ulrich Schmoch & Axel Thielmann - 136-151 Learning to invest better: Using ex post investment analysis on agri-environmental research and development
by Stuart Pearson & Peter Chudleigh & Sarah Simpson & Nick Schofield - 152-165 The importance of integrating risk in retrospective evaluations of research and development-super-†
by Peter Linquiti
April 2012, Volume 21, Issue 2
- 113-125 Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: High- and low-impact citation indicators
by Neus Herranz & Javier Ruiz-Castillo
February 2012, Volume 21, Issue 1
- 2-14 Evaluating the performance of academic departments: an analysis of research-related output efficiency
by Tommaso Agasisti & Giuseppe Catalano & Paolo Landoni & Roberto Verganti - 33-47 Evaluating the demand side: New challenges for evaluation
by J. Edler & L. Georghiou & K. Blind & E. Uyarra - 48-60 Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices
by Terttu Luukkonen - 61-70 Redefining the field of economics: Improving field normalization for the application of bibliometric techniques in the field of economics
by Thed N. van Leeuwen & Clara Calero Medina - 71-78 Opening the black box of QS World University Rankings
by Mu-Hsuan Huang - 79-85 Calibration of bibliometric indicators in space exploration research: a comparison of citation impact measurement of the space and ground-based life and physical sciences
by A.J. Nederhof & T.N. Van Leeuwen & P. Clancy
March 2012, Volume 21, Issue 1
December 2011, Volume 20, Issue 5
- 351-351 Farewell Beech Tree, hello Oxford University Press
by William Page - 353-363 What are the key indicators for evaluating the activities of universities?
by Davinia Palomares-Montero & Adela García-Aracil - 365-375 Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: new dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation
by John Rigby - 377-388 Perceptions and actions: relationships of views on risk with citation actions of nanotechnology scientists
by Jan Youtie & Stephen Carley & Philip Shapira & Elizabeth A Corley & Dietram A Scheufele - 389-395 Measuring the influence of nanotechnology environmental, health and safety research
by Stephen Carley & Alan L Porter - 397-409 Categorizing h-index variants
by M Schreiber & C C Malesios & S Psarakis - 411-421 Mobility, productivity, gender and career development of Argentinean life scientists
by Koen Jonkers
October 2011, Volume 20, Issue 4
- 263-266 Introduction to a special section on approaches to predicting and tracing R&D program effects for policy learning
by Juan D Rogers & Gretchen Jordan - 267-274 The interactive heuristic review mechanism: a new method of assessing pioneering research projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
by Yue Wang & Xiaoxuan Li & Yonghe Zheng - 275-282 Using fishbone analysis to improve the quality of proposals for science and technology programs
by Shan-Shan Li & Ling-Chu Lee - 283-292 Promoting interdisciplinarity in the life sciences: a case study
by Kate Baumwol & Sharon T Mortimer & Timothy R Huerta & Cameron D Norman & Alison M J Buchan - 293-303 Evaluating Ohio's portfolio of technology programs
by David Cheney & Jennifer Ozawa - 305-312 Tracing from applied research programs to downstream innovations: value in multiple techniques
by Rosalie Ruegg & Patrick Thomas - 313-323 TEKES impact goals, logic model and evaluation of socio-economic effects
by Jari Hyvärinen - 325-339 Average-based versus high- and low-impact indicators for the evaluation of scientific distributions
by Pedro Albarrán & Ignacio Ortuño & Javier Ruiz-Castillo - 341-346 A disadvantage of h-type indices for comparing the citation impact of two researchers
by L Egghe
September 2011, Volume 20, Issue 3
- 175-179 State of the art in assessing research impact: introduction to a special issue
by Claire Donovan - 181-183 The ‘Payback Framework’ explained
by Claire Donovan & Stephen Hanney - 185-192 An evaluation of the Mind-Body Interactions and Health Program: assessing the impact of an NIH program using the Payback Framework
by Jack E Scott & Margaret Blasinsky & Mary Dufour & Rachel J Mandai & G Stephane Philogene - 193-200 Evaluating health research funding in Ireland: assessing the impacts of the Health Research Board of Ireland's funding activities
by Edward Nason & Brendan Curran & Stephen Hanney & Barbara Janta & Gillian Hastings & Mairéad O'Driscoll & Steven Wooding - 201-209 Assessing policy and practice impacts of social science research: the application of the Payback Framework to assess the Future of Work programme
by Lisa Klautzer & Stephen Hanney & Edward Nason & Jennifer Rubin & Jonathan Grant & Steven Wooding - 211-218 Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment
by Jack Spaapen & Leonie van Drooge - 219-226 Tracing ‘productive interactions’ to identify social impacts: an example from the social sciences
by Jordi Molas-Gallart & Puay Tang - 227-237 Real-world approaches to assessing the impact of environmental research on policy
by Sarah Bell & Ben Shaw & Annette Boaz - 239-246 Peer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impacts
by J Britt Holbrook & Robert Frodeman - 247-254 The Research Excellence Framework and the ‘impact agenda’: are we creating a Frankenstein monster?
by Ben R Martin - 255-256 The impact of impact
by John D Brewer - 257-258 The impact of Payback research: developing and using evidence in policy
by Chris Henshall - 259-260 The payback of ‘Payback’: challenges in assessing research impact
by Martin Buxton
June 2011, Volume 20, Issue 2
- 90-106 Research: metrics, quality, and management implications
by Peter Andras - 107-116 Normalization of peer-evaluation measures of group research quality across academic disciplines
by Ralph Kenna & Bertrand Berche - 117-129 A bibliometric study of productivity and impact of modern language and literature research
by Anton J Nederhof - 131-143 Measuring research performance during a changing relationship between science and society
by Erik Ernø-Kjølhede & Finn Hansson - 145-158 Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science
by William Trochim - 159-171 Evaluation of ST&I programs: a methodological approach to the Brazilian Small Business Program and some comparisons with the SBIR program
by Sergio Salles-Filho & Maria Beatriz Bonacelli & Ana Maria Carneiro & Paula F Drummond de Castro & Fernando Oliveira Santos
March 2011, Volume 20, Issue 1
- 3-5 Designing indicators for policy decisions: challenges, tensions and good practices: introduction to a special issue
by Benedetto Lepori & Emanuela Reale & Robert Tijssen - 7-17 Indicator needs for the internationalisation of science policies
by Jakob Edler & Kieron Flanagan - 19-29 Evaluation of firm R&D and innovation support: new indicators and the ex-ante prediction of ex-post additionality
by Bianca Potì & Giovanni Cerulli - 31-46 Informed peer review and uninformed bibliometrics?
by Jörg Neufeld & Markus von Ins - 47-60 New uses of the institutional databases of universities: indicators of research activity
by Emanuela Reale & Daniela Alejandra De Filippo & Isabel Gómez & Benedetto Lepori & Bianca Potì & Emilia Primeri & Carole Probst & Elias Sanz Casado - 61-72 Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases
by Stefan P L de Jong & Pleun van Arensbergen & Floortje Daemen & Barend van der Meulen & Peter van den Besselaar - 73-88 Profiles and beyond: constructing consensus on measuring research output in communication sciences
by Carole Probst & Benedetto Lepori & Daniela De Filippo & Diana Ingenhoff
December 2010, Volume 19, Issue 5
- 306-316 Evaluation of artistic research
by Tomas Hellström - 317-331 Peer review practices: a content analysis of external reviews in science funding
by Martin Reinhart - 333-345 The Canada Foundation for Innovation's outcome measurement study: a pioneering approach to research evaluation
by Ghislaine Tremblay & Sandra Zohar & Juliana Bravo & Peter Potsepp & Meg Barker - 347-360 The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities
by David Pontille & Didier Torny - 361-372 Multidimensional assessment of technology and innovation programs: the impact evaluation of INCAGRO-Peru
by Sergio L M Salles-Filho & A Flavio Avila & Juan Ernesto O S Alonso & Fernando A B Colugnati - 373-384 What do European research collaboration networks in life sciences look like?
by Pauline Mattsson & Patrice Laget & Anna Nilsson Vindefjärd & Carl Johan Sundberg
October 2010, Volume 19, Issue 4
- 235-237 New research evaluation frameworks and methods for systems level learning: introduction to a special section
by Juan D Rogers & Gretchen Jordan - 239-250 Integrating utilization-focused evaluation with business process modeling for clinical research improvement
by Jonathan M Kagan & Scott Rosas & William M K Trochim