IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v34y2025ip597-606..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Canadian approaches to research impact and its assessment

Author

Listed:
  • David Phipps
  • Kathryn Graham
  • Eddy Nason

Abstract

Canada does not have a national system wide assessment of the socioeconomic impacts of academic research. We do not have a Research Excellence Framework such as in the United Kingdom. Yet Canadian researchers, funders and institutions are interested in research impact, particularly the methods and processes for generating impacts to complement methods for assessing impact. At its heart, Canada is moving to combine its expertise in ‘how do we get to impact?’ with international expertise in ‘did we get to impact?’.

Suggested Citation

  • David Phipps & Kathryn Graham & Eddy Nason, 2025. "Canadian approaches to research impact and its assessment," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 34, pages 597-606.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:597-606.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaf003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:597-606.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.