IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v34y2025ip4..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cost of deception: pseudo-journals and exploitative article processing charges

Author

Listed:
  • John Bhasker
  • Rajadurai Vijay Solomon

Abstract

The prevalence of pseudo-publishing practices poses significant challenges to the integrity of academic research, particularly in India. Pseudo-journals are publications that fail to meet the standards of legitimate scholarly publishing, including predatory and hijacked journals. While widely recognized indicators and red flags for identifying predatory journals, such as those outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and Beall’s criteria, are helpful, limited attention has been given to the role of Article Processing Charges (APCs) as a diagnostic factor. This study emphasizes the need for greater awareness of APCs as a distinguishing feature between legitimate and pseudo-journals. A significant perception gap exists among Indian researchers regarding the costs associated with open-access publishing, often leading them to fall victim to pseudo-journals. Bridging this gap requires targeted education on publishing models, research metrics, ethical practices, and credible databases. Institutions and researchers must critically evaluate journal pricing structures to avoid exploitation. Enhancing awareness and prioritizing academic integrity is essential to safeguard Indian researchers from dubious publishing practices.

Suggested Citation

  • John Bhasker & Rajadurai Vijay Solomon, 2025. "The cost of deception: pseudo-journals and exploitative article processing charges," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 34, pages 1-4.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:4.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaf017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:4.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.