IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v29y2020i1p77-86..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency evaluation of S&T resource allocation using an accurate quantification of the time-lag effect and relation effect: a case study of Chinese research institutes

Author

Listed:
  • Weizhen Yue
  • Jun Gao
  • Weilan Suo

Abstract

Efficiency evaluation is a significant means of judging the allocation quality of science and technology (S&T) resource. In reality, the process of S&T resource allocation is accompanied by the time-lag effect and relation effect, and the effect differences among research institutes are obvious. In this study, we attempt to conduct efficiency evaluation of S&T resource allocation in Chinese research institutes using an accurate quantification of the time-lag effect and relation effect. A hybrid model for efficiency evaluation is designed, where the vector autoregression (VAR) model and the output revision model are adopted to quantify the time-lag effect and relation effect, and an extended super-efficiency data envelopment analysis (SE-DEA) model is proposed to conduct efficiency estimation under the quantified effects. Subsequently, a quantitative case study is conducted based on 30 sample institutes in the Chinese Academy of Sciences using statistical data from 1992 to 2014. The results indicate that the time-lag effect of each institute varies with the forms of outputs owing to the difference of individual transformation capability. The relation effect of each institute varies with the allocation proportions of inputs owing to the difference of individual developmental orientation. Compared with other methods, the proposed hybrid model can not only determine a discriminative ranking of the sample institutes, but also clarify the strengths and weaknesses of each institute. These main findings are beneficial for decision makers of sample institutes to realize the overall optimization of S&T resource allocation from the aspects of capability promotion, resource adjustment, and efficiency improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Weizhen Yue & Jun Gao & Weilan Suo, 2020. "Efficiency evaluation of S&T resource allocation using an accurate quantification of the time-lag effect and relation effect: a case study of Chinese research institutes," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 77-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:29:y:2020:i:1:p:77-86.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvz027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu Zhu & Feng Yang & Bengang Gong & Wei Zeng, 2023. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Assessing the efficiency of innovation entities in China: evidence from a nonhomogeneous data envelopment analysis and Tobit," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 175-205, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:29:y:2020:i:1:p:77-86.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.