University policy engagement bodies in the UK and the variable meanings of and approaches to impact
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.References listed on IDEAS
- David Budtz Pedersen & Jonas Følsgaard Grønvad & Rolf Hvidtfeldt, 2020. "Methods for mapping the impact of social sciences and humanities—A literature review," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 4-21.
- Simon Pardoe, 2014. "Research Impact Unpacked? A Social Science Agenda for Critically Analyzing the Discourse of Impact and Informing Practice," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, April.
- Duncan A Thomas & Maria Nedeva & Mayra M Tirado & Merle Jacob, 2020. "Changing research on research evaluation: A critical literature review to revisit the agenda," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(3), pages 275-288.
- Stevie Upton & Paul Vallance & John Goddard, 2014. "From outcomes to process: evidence for a new approach to research impact assessment," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 352-365.
- Rosalind Gill, 2014. "Academics, Cultural Workers and Critical Labour Studies," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 12-30, February.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Ohid Yaqub & Dmitry Malkov & Josh Siepel, 2023. "How unpredictable is research impact? Evidence from the UK’s Research Excellence Framework," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 273-285.
- repec:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2024:i:2:p:273-285. is not listed on IDEAS
- Christian A. Vossler & Timothy N. Cason & James J. Murphy & Paul J. Ferraro & Todd L. Cherry & George Loewenstein & Peter Martinsson & Jason F. Shogren & Leaf van Boven & Daan van Soest, 2024. "The impact of experiments on environmental policy and natural resource management," Working Papers 2024-05, University of Tennessee, Department of Economics.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Jorrit P Smit & Laurens K Hessels, 2021. "The production of scientific and societal value in research evaluation: a review of societal impact assessment methods [Systems Thinking, Knowledge and Action: Towards Better Models and Methods]," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 323-335.
- Melinda Craike & Bojana Klepac & Amy Mowle & Therese Riley, 2023. "Theory of systems change: An initial, middle-range theory of public health research impact," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(3), pages 603-621.
- Peter Weißhuhn & Katharina Helming & Johanna Ferretti, 2018. "Research impact assessment in agriculture—A review of approaches and impact areas," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 36-42.
- Ole Henning Sørensen & Jakob Bjørner & Andreas Holtermann & Johnny Dyreborg & Jorid Birkelund Sørli & Jesper Kristiansen & Steffen Bohni Nielsen, 2022. "Measuring societal impact of research—Developing and validating an impact instrument for occupational health and safety," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 118-131.
- James A. Cunningham & Kristel Miller & Jose-Luis Perea-Vicente, 2024. "Academic entrepreneurship in the humanities and social sciences: a systematic literature review and research agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1880-1913, October.
- Lai Ma & Rachael Agnew, 2022. "Deconstructing impact: A framework for impact evaluation in grant applications [Evidencing Impact from Art Research: Analysis of Impact Case Studies from the REF 2014]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 289-301.
- Elizabeth N. Farley-Ripple & Kathryn Oliver & Annette Boaz, 2020. "Mapping the community: use of research evidence in policy and practice," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
- Concepta McManus & Abilio Afonso Baeta Neves & Alvaro Toubes Prata, 2021. "Scientific publications from non-academic sectors and their impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(11), pages 8887-8911, November.
- Christina Boswell & Katherine Smith, 2018.
"Correction: Rethinking policy “impact”: four models of research-policy relations,"
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-1, December.
- Christina Boswell & Katherine Smith, 2017. "Rethinking policy ‘impact’: four models of research-policy relations," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-10, December.
- Barış Çıvak & Senem Besler, 2022. "A Critical Analysis of Managerial Control Mechanisms in Hotel Businesses," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
- Jamal El-Ouahi, 2024. "Scientometric rules as a guide to transform science systems in the Middle East and North Africa," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(2), pages 869-888, February.
- Perkmann, Markus & Salandra, Rossella & Tartari, Valentina & McKelvey, Maureen & Hughes, Alan, 2021. "Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
- Luciane Graziele Pereira Ferrero & Sergio Luiz Monteiro Salles-Filho, 2025. "Planning and resource allocation models in research‐intensive universities: budget allocation and the search for excellence," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
- Melissa Xiaohui Qin, 2024. "A systematic synthesis and analysis of English-language Shuōwén scholarship," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
- Papoulias, Stan (Constantina) & Callard, Felicity, 2022. "Material and epistemic precarity: It's time to talk about labour exploitation in mental health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
- Václav Linkov & Kieran O’Doherty & Eunsoo Choi & Gyuseog Han, 2021. "Linguistic Diversity Index: A Scientometric Measure to Enhance the Relevance of Small and Minority Group Languages," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
- repec:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2024:i:3:p:603-621. is not listed on IDEAS
- Maia Chankseliani, 2023. "Who funds the production of globally visible research in the Global South?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 783-801, January.
- Meredith Nash & Brendan Churchill, 2020. "Caring during COVID‐19: A gendered analysis of Australian university responses to managing remote working and caring responsibilities," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 833-846, September.
- Janet Merkel, 2019. "‘Freelance isn’t free.’ Co-working as a critical urban practice to cope with informality in creative labour markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 526-547, February.
- Andrea Bonaccorsi & Filippo Chiarello & Gualtiero Fantoni, 2021. "Impact for whom? Mapping the users of public research with lexicon-based text mining," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1745-1774, February.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:31:y:2022:i:3:p:372-384.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v31y2022i3p372-384..html