IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v4y2014i2p2158244014529774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Impact Unpacked? A Social Science Agenda for Critically Analyzing the Discourse of Impact and Informing Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Pardoe

Abstract

U.K. policy is to embed “knowledge transfer as a permanent core activity in universities.†In this article, I propose an agenda for analyzing and informing the evolving practices of communicating university research insight across institutions, and for analyzing critically the ways in which “research impact†is being demanded, represented, and guided in current policy discourse. As an example, I analyze the U.K. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) “Step-by-step guide to maximising impact,†using the concept of “recontextualization.†The analysis illustrates that the availability of relevant social science research does not ensure its use, even by the research funding council. It suggests that while a rationalist, common sense representation of communication may be functional in making research impact appear achievable within existing funding, it may be potentially counter-productive in terms of ensuring that research contributes to society. A recent project is cited to illustrate some of the intellectual challenges that are not indicated in the ESRC guide, and which demonstrate the value of social science insight.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Pardoe, 2014. "Research Impact Unpacked? A Social Science Agenda for Critically Analyzing the Discourse of Impact and Informing Practice," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:2158244014529774
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244014529774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014529774
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244014529774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hannah Durrant & Eleanor MacKillop, 2022. "University policy engagement bodies in the UK and the variable meanings of and approaches to impact," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 372-384.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:2158244014529774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.