IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v34y2025ip172-89..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and pilot study of a university research culture questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Ruby Roberts
  • Rhona Flin
  • Andrew J Lamb
  • Jane Williams
  • Nick Fyfe

Abstract

A positive working environment and culture are essential for researchers as these enable them to conduct valuable, high-quality research. Yet, university staff frequently report their research culture as less than ideal. To understand researchers’ experiences of research culture to inform tangible change, several surveys have been conducted by research-related organizations and individual universities. However, despite a plethora of studies, there does not appear to be a widely adopted research culture questionnaire, with variation in content and length in those used to date. A 37-item research culture questionnaire was developed based on the extant literatures. It was piloted in one small-medium sized university with 177 academic staff across a range of disciplines engaged in research. Qualitative questions were included to provide a richer insight into current research perceptions. Exploratory factor analysis identified eight factors, providing an initial framework of research culture. This consisted of: School Research Value, University Research Value, Research Support, Research Knowledge, Collaboration, Wellbeing & Inclusivity, Open Research and Research Integrity. Whilst it will require further testing and refinement, a preliminary psychometric analysis provides initial indications of internal structure and internal reliability. The factor set provides insight into research culture drivers which can be used to target effective interventions. This type of research culture questionnaire would allow universities to not only assess their own culture but also benchmark their results against other universities. A standardized research culture measurement process (e.g. questionnaires, narratives), feeding into research evaluation activities, may have wider implications for those looking to facilitate research culture changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruby Roberts & Rhona Flin & Andrew J Lamb & Jane Williams & Nick Fyfe, 2025. "Development and pilot study of a university research culture questionnaire," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 34, pages 172-189.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:172-89.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaf011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:172-89.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.