IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v34y2025ipscw058-31..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The development and application of a bibliometric strength, potential and risk analysis for research strategy in a University Medical Center

Author

Listed:
  • Rik Iping
  • Thed N van Leeuwen
  • Ed Noyons
  • Alex Burdorf
  • Irene M J Mathijssen
  • Johannes P T M van Leeuwen
  • Adrian M Cohen

Abstract

This paper describes the development of a bibliometric strength, potential and risk analysis tool, and its applications for research strategy and evaluation. We focus specifically on the motivation, organizational strategic needs, the development and evaluation of the tool. Furthermore, we highlight the co-creation process of the tool and discuss the methodology behind the tool, how it works and initial feedback on how insights from the tool can be applied for research strategy and evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Rik Iping & Thed N van Leeuwen & Ed Noyons & Alex Burdorf & Irene M J Mathijssen & Johannes P T M van Leeuwen & Adrian M Cohen, 2025. "The development and application of a bibliometric strength, potential and risk analysis for research strategy in a University Medical Center," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 34, pages 058-031.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:scw058-31.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaf007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:scw058-31.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.