IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rae/jouces/v76y2005p9-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appropriation et identification des territoires du vin : la lutte entre grands et petits propriétaires du « Corton »

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Jacquet

    (Institut d’histoire contemporaine, Université de Bourgogne, 6 boulevard Gabriel, 21004 Dijon cedex)

  • Gilles Laferté

    (INRA-CESAER, 26 boulevard du Docteur Petitjean, BP 87999, 21079 Dijon cedex)

Abstract

A partir d’une analyse de cas, les conflits autour de la délimitation de l’appellation du vin Corton en Bourgogne dans l’entre-deux-guerres, le texte distingue deux modes de construction du territoire : l’identification, processus de désignation par l’Etat et l’appropriation, processus de revendication par les intéressés eux-mêmes. Face à l’impossible identification légitime des territoires viticoles par l’Etat, la loi de 1919 sur les appellations d’origine impose le recours à la voie judiciaire pour régler les différends. Les acteurs en conflit s’affrontent alors sur des appropriations et définitions divergentes du territoire. Chacun revendique des registres de justification différents pour tenter d’imposer son territoire. Le territoire n’est nullement un héritage naturel, mais le fruit d’un affrontement social. Si les grands propriétaires jouent d’arguments économiques et historiques pour fonder leur revendication à une zone d’appellation restrictive, les petits propriétaires, nouveaux entrants de l’appellation et de l’économie viticole de luxe, avancent eux des arguments politiques, républicains, pour séduire les tribunaux de la IIIe République. La définition du territoire et les règles du marché dépendent d’un jeu qui dépasse largement la lutte strictement économique variant selon les contextes politiques et les rapports de forces sociaux.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Jacquet & Gilles Laferté, 2005. "Appropriation et identification des territoires du vin : la lutte entre grands et petits propriétaires du « Corton »," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 76, pages 9-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:rae:jouces:v:76:y:2005:p:9-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/201769/2/77-85-112.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deborah Roberts, 2000. "The Spatial Diffusion of Secondary Impacts: Rural-Urban Spillovers in Grampian, Scotland," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 76(3), pages 395-412.
    2. Waters, Edward C. & Weber, Bruce A. & Holland, David W., 1999. "The Role Of Agriculture In Oregon'S Economic Base: Findings From A Social Accounting Matrix," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Roberts, Deborah, 1998. "Rural-Urban Interdependencies: Analysis Using an Inter-Regional SAM Model," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 25(4), pages 506-527.
    4. Irma Adelman & Sherman Robinson, 1986. "U.S. Agriculture in a General Equilibrium Framework: Analysis with a Social Accounting Matrix," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(5), pages 1196-1207.
    5. Pyatt, F Graham & Round, Jeffery I, 1979. "Accounting and Fixed Price Multipliers in a Social Accounting Matrix Framework," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 89(356), pages 850-873, December.
    6. Roberts, Deborah, 1995. "UK Agriculture in the Wider Economy: The Importance of Net SAM Linkage Effects," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 22(4), pages 495-511.
    7. David W. Roland‐Holst & Ferran Sancho, 1992. "Relative Income Determination In The United States: A Social Accounting Perspective," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 38(3), pages 311-327, September.
    8. Cohen, S. I., 1996. "Urban growth and circular flow in a SAM-framework: The case of The Netherlands," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-14, March.
    9. G. Andrew Bernat & Thomas G. Johnson, 1991. "Distributional Effects of Household Linkages," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(2), pages 326-333.
    10. Manuel Alejandro Cardenete & Ferran Sancho, 2004. "Reverse Impact Assessment Using a Regional Social Accounting Matrix," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(5), pages 937-945, May.
    11. Roland-Holst, David W & Sancho, Ferran, 1992. "Relative Income Determination in the United States: A Social Accounting Perspective," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 38(3), pages 311-327, September.
    12. Berkeley Hill, 1998. "The Implications for Agricultural Statistics of Changes in the System of National Accounts," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 359-377, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benedetto Rocchi & Donato Romano & Gianluca Stefani, 2005. "Distributive impacts of alternative agricultural policies: A SAM-based analysis for Italy," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 77, pages 85-112.
    2. Rocchi, Benedetto & Romano, Donato & Stefani, Gianluca, 2002. "Agriculture and Income Distribution: Insights from a SAM of the Italian Economy," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24919, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Psaltopoulos, Demetris & Balamou, Eudokia & Skuras, Dimitris & Ratinger, Tomas & Sieber, Stefan, 2011. "Modelling the impacts of CAP Pillar 1 and 2 measures on local economies in Europe: Testing a case study-based CGE-model approach," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 53-69, January.
    4. Francisco Javier De Miguel & Jesus Perez-Mayo, 2004. "Measuring inequality in a region: a SAM approach," ERSA conference papers ersa04p237, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Hidekazu Itoh, 2016. "Understanding of economic spillover mechanism by structural path analysis: a case study of interregional social accounting matrix focused on institutional sectors in Japan," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 5(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. repec:elg:eechap:14395_9 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Rocchi, Benedetto & Romano, Donato & Hamza, Raid, 2013. "Agriculture reform and food crisis in Syria: Impacts on poverty and inequality," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 190-203.
    8. Tugrul Temel, 2013. "Family Size, Human Capital And Growth: Structural Path Analysis Of Rwanda," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 39-73, December.
    9. De Miguel Vélez, F.J. & Manresa Sánchez, A., 2004. "Modelos SAM lineales y distribución de renta: una aplicación para la economía extremeña," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 22, pages 1-22, Diciembre.
    10. Njoya, Eric Tchouamou & Nikitas, Alexandros, 2020. "The role of air transport in employment creation and inclusive growth in the Global South: The case of South Africa," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Skuras, Dimitris & Psaltopoulos, Demetrios, 2016. "Estimating Spatial Employment Impacts of the CAP through Social Accounting Analysis," 160th Seminar, December 1-2, 2016, Warsaw, Poland 249760, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. David Roland-Holst & Finn Tarp, 2006. "Globalization, Economic Reform, and Structural Price Transmission: Sam Decomposition Techniques with an Empirical Application to Vietnam," Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion, and Well-Being, in: Alain Janvry & Ravi Kanbur (ed.), Poverty, Inequality and Development, chapter 0, pages 287-307, Springer.
    13. Francisco Javier de Miguel Velez & Jesus Perez-Mayo, 2006. "Linear SAM models for inequality changes analysis: an application to the Extremadurian economy," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(20), pages 2393-2403.
    14. Leeuwen, E.S. van & Nijkamp, P., 2009. "Social Accounting Matrices; The development and application of SAMs at the local level," Serie Research Memoranda 0045, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    15. Willem Thorbecke, "undated". "Who Pays for Disinflation? Disinflationary Monetary Policy and the Distribution of Income," Economics Public Policy Brief Archive ppb_38, Levy Economics Institute.
    16. Cooke, Stephen C. & Watson, Philip, 2011. "A Comparison of Regional Export Enhancement and Import Substitution Economic Development Strategies," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 41(1), pages 1-15.
    17. Burrell, Alison M., 2010. "Is it becoming more difficult to research EU agricultural sector policies?," 50th Annual Conference, Braunschweig, Germany, September 29-October 1, 2010 93946, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    18. Vega, Amaya & Corina Miller, Ana & O’Donoghue, Cathal, 2014. "Economic impacts of seafood production growth targets in Ireland," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 39-45.
    19. D'Haese, Marijke F.C. & Lecomte, Philippe & Schipper, Robert A. & Alary, Veronique & Kowalska, Agniezka, 2007. "On dairy, economic sustainability and governmental support in Reunion Island: A research note," 106th Seminar, October 25-27, 2007, Montpellier, France 7952, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Gabriel Katz & Héctor Pastori & Pedro Berrenechea, 2004. "Construcción de una Matriz de Contabilidad Social para Uruguay para el año 2000," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 2004, Department of Economics - dECON.
    21. Hidekazu Itoh, 2015. "An Interregional SAM Construction focused on Institutional Sectors and Structural Path Analysis in Japan," Post-Print hal-01123567, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rae:jouces:v:76:y:2005:p:9-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Saux-Nogues (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.