IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recoru/ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_255_1_5166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La politique agricole dans les négociations internationales

Author

Listed:
  • Louis-Pascal Mahé
  • Cathie Laroche-Dupraz

Abstract

[eng] THE FRENCH AGRICULTURAL POLICY WITHIN THE INTERNATIONAL ROUNDS : TIME OF AGGIORNAMENTO . The paper covers the main topic of the French agricultural trade policy: the cap and the gatt. We review some developments of the cap in relation to the successive gatt rounds. Against early evidence of difficulties, the cap was not significantly adjusted, even in 1984, before the 1992 reform under the pressure of the Uruguay Round and of the previous concessions making the grain policy untenable. The French agricultural strategy is seen as too narrowly focused on the financial and trade benefits derived from the customs union and the financial solidarity principle. The French agricultural policy is paradoxical for a structural exporter as it relies extensively on market support, intervention and restitutions. Some explanations of this French paradox are suggested, and the supra national nature of the cap viewed as a main factor. Agenda 2000 and the « Loi d'orientation » could launch a far reaching agricultural policy, consistent with the European model of the countryside, if the whole support to the farm sector were channelled through the system of the «Contrats territoriaux d'exploitation», based not on agricultural products volumes, but on agricultural practices and effective environmental services. [fre] L'article porte sur le principal volet extérieur de la politique agricole française: les relations entre la PAC et le GATT. Il examine les liens entre l'évolution de la pac et les cycles de négociations du gatt. En dépit des nombreux problèmes apparus, la pac n'a pas changé de manière significative, même en 1984, avant la réforme de 1992 et le cycle Uruguay. La stratégie française nous paraît trop influencée par une vision à court terme de l'intérêt national basée sur le retour budgétaire et l'avantage commercial. Les concessions perçues comme mineures lors des premiers rounds du gatt ont rendu la politique céréalière intenable. La politique agricole française est paradoxale, car fondée sur le soutien des prix en situation d'exportateur structurel. Des explications de cette spécificité française sont avancées, dont le caractère supranational de la pac. L'agenda 2000 et la Loi d'orientation pourraient préfigurer une politique agricole d'avenir, cohérente avec un modèle européen de l'espace rural, si l'ensemble du soutien passait par le dispositif des cte et était fondé sur des pratiques agricoles et non sur des productions.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis-Pascal Mahé & Cathie Laroche-Dupraz, 2000. "La politique agricole dans les négociations internationales," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 255(1), pages 135-153.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_255_1_5166
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.2000.5166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.2000.5166
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_255_1_5166
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olson, Mancur, 1985. "The Exploitation and Subsidization of Agriculture in Developing and Developed Countries," 1985 Conference, August 26-September 4, 1985, Málaga, Spain 182530, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Jean-Marc Boussard, 1985. "La production agricole répond-elle aux prix ?," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 167(1), pages 20-27.
    3. Hervé Guyomard & Yves Léon & Louis-Pascal Mahé, 1992. "La réforme de la PAC et les négociations du GATT : un pas nécessaire pour un compromis minimal ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 254(1), pages 41-61.
    4. Louis P. Mahé & Michel Roudet, 1980. "La politique agricole française et l'Europe verte : impasse ou révision ?," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 135(1), pages 12-27.
    5. Louis P. Mahé & J.-C. Poupa & T. Trochet, 1984. "Un protectionnisme plus équilibré : le FEOGA et la réforme de la PAC," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 164(1), pages 17-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_255_1_5166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecoru .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.