IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/354368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'intégration des PECO à la nouvelle PAC. Une double révolution inachevée

Author

Listed:
  • Blanchet, Jacques
  • Revel, Alain
  • Linglin, alexandra
  • Kosciusko-Morizet, Nathalie
  • Wormser, Véronique

Abstract

The CEECs own two third of the EU 12 grain land. The production of grains, oilseeds, potatoes, fruits, vegetables, dairy and pork products is significant. Not following the China's example of 1978, the 1990 agricultural revolution has not braught any farm production increase, but on the contrary, a one third decrease. The kolkhozian structures have been maintained under an other name. This unacomplished revolution of the ceecs' side force the reformed cap of 1992 to a new evolution, perhaps unavoidable for other reasons. So, the new extension of European Union will not be like the preceeding ones. Two great options are open : does cap be reformed again before its widening towards East countries ? What position to adopt towards production subsidies which became the base of the new policy ?

Suggested Citation

  • Blanchet, Jacques & Revel, Alain & Linglin, alexandra & Kosciusko-Morizet, Nathalie & Wormser, Véronique, 1997. "L'intégration des PECO à la nouvelle PAC. Une double révolution inachevée," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 240.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:354368
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.354368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/354368/files/ecoru_0013-0559_1997_num_240_1_4879.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.354368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy E. Josling & Stefan Tangermann & T. K. Warley, 1996. "Agriculture in the GATT," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-37890-2.
    2. Irena Grosfeld & Claudia Senik-Leygonie, 1996. "Trois enjeux des privatisations à l'Est," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 47(6), pages 1351-1371.
    3. Karl-Eugen Waedekin, 1993. "Décollectivisation et colonat public," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 214(1), pages 57-61.
    4. Timothy E. Josling & Stefan Tangermann & T. K. Warley, 1996. "The Future for Agriculture in the GATT," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Agriculture in the GATT, chapter 9, pages 217-243, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacques Blanchet & Alain Revel & Alexandra Linglin & Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet & Véronique Wormser, 1997. "L'intégration des PECO à la nouvelle PAC. Une double révolution inachevée," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 240(1), pages 49-58.
    2. Karmen Erjavec & Emil Erjavec, 2021. "Framing agricultural policy through the EC’s strategies on CAP reforms (1992–2017)," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Berger, Jurij & Dalheimer, Bernhard & Brümmer, Bernhard, 2021. "Effects of variable EU import levies on corn price volatility," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Manders, Ton & Bollen, Johannes, 2001. "How to Induce Developing Countries to Act Against Climate Change?," Conference papers 330944, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Louis-Pascal Mahé & Cathie Laroche-Dupraz, 2000. "La politique agricole dans les négociations internationales," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 255(1), pages 135-153.
    6. Sachin Kumar Sharma & Adeet Dobhal & Surabhi Agrawal & Abhijit Das, 2021. "Demystifying Blue Box Support to Agriculture Under the WTO: Implications for Developing Countries," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 22(2), pages 161-185, September.
    7. Hübler, Michael, 2010. "Can Carbon Based Tariffs Effectively Reduce Emissions? A Numerical Analysis with Focus on China," Conference papers 331921, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Jason H. Grant & Shawn Arita & Charlotte Emlinger & Robert Johansson & Chaoping Xie, 2021. "Agricultural exports and retaliatory trade actions: An empirical assessment of the 2018/2019 trade conflict," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 619-640, June.
    9. Glauber, Joseph W., 2017. "Agricultural insurance and the WTO:," IFPRI book chapters, in: Bouët, Antoine; Laborde Debucquet, David (ed.), Agriculture, development, and the global trading system: 2000– 2015, chapter 10, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Trofimov, Ivan D., 2017. "Political economy of trade protection and liberalization: in search of agency-based and holistic framework of policy change," MPRA Paper 79504, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Kramb, M.C., 2001. "Eine ökonomische Analyse von sanitären und phytosanitären Außenhandelsmaßnahmen am Beispiel des „Hormonstreites“ zwischen der EU und den USA," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 37.
    12. Wusheng Yu & Hans G. Jensen, 2010. "China’s Agricultural Policy Transition: Impacts of Recent Reforms and Future Scenarios," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 343-368, June.
    13. Tangermann, Stefan, 1997. "Agricultural Implications of EU Eastern Enlargement and the Future of the CAP," 1997: Economic Transition in Central and East Europe, and the Former Soviet Union: Implications ... Symposium, June 12-14, 1997, Berlin, Germany 50839, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    14. Jörg-Volker Schrader, 2000. "CAP reform, the Berlin summit, and EU enlargement," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 35(5), pages 231-242, September.
    15. Kym Anderson, 2003. "Measuring Effects of Trade Policy Distortions: How Far Have We Come?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 413-440, April.
    16. Marie-Ange VEGANZONES-VAROUDAKIS, 2000. "Market Access, Export Subsidies, Domestic Support and the WTO Negociations: a Review and Synthesis," Working Papers 200008, CERDI.
    17. W. H. Furtan & Blain M. van Melle, 2004. "Canada's Agricultural Trade in North America: Do National Borders Matter?," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(3), pages 317-331.
    18. Lajtos, Ildikó, 2010. "Verhandlungsverhalten und Anspruchsanpassung im internationalen Verhandlungsprozess: Die WTO-Agrarverhandlungen zum Abbau exportwettbewerbsfördernder Maßnahmen," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 55, number 94723.
    19. Anderson, Kym, 2004. "Setting the Trade Policy Agenda: What Roles for Economists?," Working Papers 14574, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    20. Karl Meilke & Dermot Hayes & Yves Surry & Jay Fabiosa & Frank Fuller, 2001. "Trade liberalization in the international pork sector : analysis of zero-for-zero option," Post-Print hal-01594094, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:354368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.