IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v135y2025i669p1467-1495..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental Leave, Worker Substitutability and Firms’ Employment

Author

Listed:
  • Mathias Huebener
  • Jonas Jessen
  • Daniel Kuehnle
  • Michael Oberfichtner

Abstract

Motherhood and parental leave are frequent causes of worker absences and employment interruptions, yet little is known about their effects on firms. Based on linked employer-employee data from Germany, we examine how parental leave absences affect small- and medium-sized firms. We show that they anticipate the absence with replacement hirings in the six months before childbirth. A 2007 parental leave reform extending leave absences reduces firm-level employment and total wages up to three years after childbirth, driven by firms with few internal substitutes for the absent mother. However, we do not find longer-term effects on firms’ employment, wage bills or likelihood to shut down. The reform led to an increase in replacement hirings, but firms did not respond to longer expected absences of mothers by subsequently hiring fewer young women. Overall, our findings show that anticipated, extended parental leave does not have a lasting impact on firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathias Huebener & Jonas Jessen & Daniel Kuehnle & Michael Oberfichtner, 2025. "Parental Leave, Worker Substitutability and Firms’ Employment," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(669), pages 1467-1495.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:669:p:1467-1495.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueae114
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:135:y:2025:i:669:p:1467-1495.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.