IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/restud/v88y2021i5p2308-2343..html

The Returns to Nursing: Evidence from a Parental-Leave Program
[Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation and the Role of Language Barriers in the Provision of Cardiac Rehabilitation to Migrants]

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin U Friedrich
  • Martin B Hackmann

Abstract

In this article, we quantify the effects of nurses on health care delivery and patient health in the context of an unintended and policy-induced nurse shortage. Our empirical strategy takes advantage of a parental-leave program in Denmark, which offered any parent the opportunity to take up to one year’s absence per child aged 0–8. Combining the policy variation with administrative employer–employee match data, we document substantial program take-up among nurses, who could not be replaced on net despite public education and immigration expansion efforts to mitigate the employment effects. We find that the parental leave program reduced hospital and nursing home nurse employment by 15% and 10%, respectively. Using detailed patient health records, we find detrimental effects on hospital-care delivery as indicated by a large increase in 30-day readmission rates among acute myocardial infarction patients. We find no evidence for an increase in hospital mortality. In nursing homes, we estimate a large increase in mortality.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin U Friedrich & Martin B Hackmann, 2021. "The Returns to Nursing: Evidence from a Parental-Leave Program [Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation and the Role of Language Barriers in the Provision of Cardiac Rehabilitation to Migrants]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(5), pages 2308-2343.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:88:y:2021:i:5:p:2308-2343.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdaa082
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:88:y:2021:i:5:p:2308-2343.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/restud .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.