IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nec/raestu/v92y2012i02p161-181_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nuisible ou gibier? Une analyse économique de la chasse des grands animaux en France

Author

Listed:
  • Ropars-Collet, Carole

Abstract

L’augmentation des populations de grands gibiers en France, notamment le sanglier, a eu pour conséquence une augmentation des dommages collectifs. Pour autant, cette espèce n’est pas considérée uniquement comme nuisible puisqu’elle est valorisée par la pratique de la chasse. L’article se propose de caractériser l’optimum collectif en mobilisant le cadre de l’économie des ressources naturelles. La densité optimale des populations de gibier est définie à partir d’un modèle bioéconomique, qui prend en compte l’ensemble des coûts et bénéfices afférents à la chasse et à la présence de gibier. Elle est comparée à celle qui correspond à l’optimum des chasseurs avec droits de propriété sur la ressource, puis à la « tragédie des communs ». Ce cadre analytique permet une interprétation économique de l’évolution de la chasse en France et du contexte institutionnel et législatif. Le modèle développé permet ensuite de discuter des politiques cynégétiques à mettre en place et des recommandations en matière d’instrumentation économique de ces politiques.

Suggested Citation

  • Ropars-Collet, Carole, 2012. "Nuisible ou gibier? Une analyse économique de la chasse des grands animaux en France," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 92(02), pages 161-181, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nec:raestu:v:92:y:2012:i:02:p:161-181_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.necplus.eu/abstract_S1966960711002037
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Horan & Erwin Bulte, 2004. "Optimal and Open Access Harvesting of Multi-Use Species in a Second-Best World," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 28(3), pages 251-272, July.
    2. Anne Johannesen & Anders Skonhoft, 2004. "Property Rights and Natural Resource Conservation. A Bio-Economic Model with Numerical Illustrations from the Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 28(4), pages 469-488, August.
    3. Carole Ropars-Collet & Philippe Le Goffe, 2009. "La gestion du sanglier : modèle bioéconomique, dégâts agricoles et prix des chasses en forêt domaniale," Working Papers SMART - LERECO 09-11, INRA UMR SMART-LERECO.
    4. Graciela Chichilnisky, 1997. "What Is Sustainable Development?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 73(4), pages 467-491.
    5. Li, Chuan-Zhong & Lofgren, Karl-Gustaf, 2000. "Renewable Resources and Economic Sustainability: A Dynamic Analysis with Heterogeneous Time Preferences," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 236-250, November.
    6. Rondeau, Daniel, 2001. "Along the Way Back from the Brink," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 156-182, September.
    7. Horan, R.D. & Bulte, E.H., 2004. "Optimal and open access harvesting and multi-use species in a second best world," Other publications TiSEM 95000e50-7225-4f4d-aeaf-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Hasenkamp, Georg, 1995. "The economics of hunting, game-preservation, and their legal setting," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 453-468, September.
    9. Skonhoft, Anders, 2007. "Economic modeling approaches for wildlife and species conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 223-231, April.
    10. Chichilnisky, Graciela & Heal, Geoffrey & Beltratti, Andrea, 1995. "The Green Golden Rule," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 175-179, August.
    11. Skonhoft, Anders, 2006. "The costs and benefits of animal predation: An analysis of Scandinavian wolf re-colonization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 830-841, July.
    12. Hasenkamp, G., 1995. "The Economics of Hunting, Game-Preservation, and Their Legal Setting," Faechergruppe Volkswirtschaftlehre 86, University of Hamburg, Institute of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jens Abildtrup & Frank Jensen, 2012. "The Regulation of Hunting: A Population Tax," IFRO Working Paper 2012/2, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    2. Jens Abildtrup & Franck Jensen, 2014. "The regulation of hunting: A game population based tax on hunters," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 95(3), pages 281-298.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nec:raestu:v:92:y:2012:i:02:p:161-181_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Louis Soubret). General contact details of provider: http://www.necplus.eu/jid_RAEProvider-Email:jlsoubret@necplus.eu .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.