IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/ecopln/v57y2024i2d10.1007_s10644-024-09626-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of the digital economy on green innovation: the moderating role of fiscal decentralization

Author

Listed:
  • Minjie Li

    (Fujian Jiangxia University)

  • Mengjun Meng

    (Fuzhou University)

  • Yihui Chen

    (Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University)

Abstract

The digital economy represents a new economic form that exhibits a heavy reliance on data resources, and it has the potential to extensively affect green innovation. In this paper, the theoretical mechanism through which the digital economy affects green innovation is dissected and panel data from 278 Chinese cities covering the period of 2011 to 2019 are collected to empirically test both the quantitative and qualitative dimensions of the impact of the digital economy on green innovation. The results show the following: (1) The digital economy exerts a dual impact by both increasing quantity and improving quality in green innovation. (2) By eliminating financial restrictions, encouraging industrial collaborative agglomeration, and raising governmental environmental concerns, the digital economy exerts an influence on green innovation. (3) The relationship between the digital economy and green innovation is significantly negatively mediated by fiscal decentralization. (4) The digital economy hinders the growth of green innovation by exerting a negative spatial spillover effect on surrounding areas. (5) The digital economy has a more positive impact on green innovation in eastern cities, large cities, cities with high administrative hierarchy, and cities with strong intellectual property rights protection. Based on the conclusions of this study, we propose that the government should continue to promote the development of the digital economy in the future to fully release the innovation dividend of the digital economy, accelerate the construction of a scientific performance appraisal system to overcome government failure in the process of green innovation, and consider the differences in the development of regions to form a new pattern of synergistic green innovation between regions. In this paper, to understand how the digital economy promotes green innovation, we not only provide theoretical and empirical evidence at the city level but also provide references and insights with which governments can improve their green innovation incentive policies and optimize the design of fiscal decentralization systems for the promotion of green innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Minjie Li & Mengjun Meng & Yihui Chen, 2024. "The impact of the digital economy on green innovation: the moderating role of fiscal decentralization," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1-33, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:ecopln:v:57:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10644-024-09626-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10644-024-09626-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10644-024-09626-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10644-024-09626-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Neffke & Martin Henning & Ron Boschma, 2011. "How Do Regions Diversify over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 87(3), pages 237-265, July.
    2. Han Long & Gen-Fu Feng & Chun-Ping Chang, 2023. "How does ESG performance promote corporate green innovation?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2889-2913, August.
    3. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    4. Peterson K. Ozili, 2018. "Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 18(4), pages 329-340, December.
    5. Nathan Nunn & Nancy Qian, 2014. "US Food Aid and Civil Conflict," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(6), pages 1630-1666, June.
    6. Hu, Haiqing & Wei, Wei & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2022. "Examining the impact of extreme temperature on green innovation in China: Evidence from city-level data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Ran, Qiying & Yang, Xiaodong & Yan, Hongchuan & Xu, Yang & Cao, Jianhong, 2023. "Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: Does the digital economy matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Yu Pei & Yingming Zhu & Suxia Liu & Menglu Xie, 2021. "Industrial agglomeration and environmental pollution: based on the specialized and diversified agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4061-4085, March.
    9. Teece, David J., 2018. "Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1367-1387.
    10. James P. LeSage, 2014. "What Regional Scientists Need to Know about Spatial Econometrics," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 44(1), pages 13-32, Spring.
    11. Ma, Dan & Zhu, Qing, 2022. "Innovation in emerging economies: Research on the digital economy driving high-quality green development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 801-813.
    12. Rongcheng Zhu & Qian Li, 2023. "How has the Internet fostered the greening of enterprises in China? The moderating role of governmental transparency," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 1383-1395, April.
    13. Sheryl Winston Smith, 2014. "Follow me to the innovation frontier? Leaders, laggards, and the differential effects of imports and exports on technological innovation," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 45(3), pages 248-274, April.
    14. Giummo, Jesse, 2014. "An examination of the intertemporal returns of patented inventions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1312-1319.
    15. Ma, Kelin, 2023. "Digital inclusive finance and corporate green technology innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PB).
    16. Xiwen Yin & Dingqing Wang & Jingjing Lu & Lei Liu, 2023. "Does green credit policy promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3187-3215, October.
    17. Marino, Marianna & Parrotta, Pierpaolo & Valletta, Giacomo, 2019. "Electricity (de)regulation and innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 748-758.
    18. Álvaro Parra, 2019. "Sequential innovation, patent policy, and the dynamics of the replacement effect," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(3), pages 568-590, September.
    19. Ozili, Peterson Kitakogelu, 2018. "Impact of Digital Finance on Financial Inclusion and Stability," MPRA Paper 84771, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Glenn Ellison & Edward L. Glaeser & William R. Kerr, 2010. "What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 1195-1213, June.
    21. Alina Sorescu & Martin Schreier, 2021. "Innovation in the digital economy: a broader view of its scope, antecedents, and consequences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 627-631, July.
    22. Cui, Xin & Wang, Chunfeng & Sensoy, Ahmet & Liao, Jing & Xie, Xiaochen, 2023. "Economic policy uncertainty and green innovation: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    23. Yu-Hsien Lin & Yu-Shan Chen, 2017. "Determinants of green competitive advantage: the roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1663-1685, July.
    24. Umar Farooq, 2023. "Exploring the external forces driving green environmental innovation: empirical evidence from Asian market," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 981-1006, April.
    25. J. Paul Elhorst, 2014. "Matlab Software for Spatial Panels," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 37(3), pages 389-405, July.
    26. Donis, Silvia & Gómez, Jaime & Salazar, Idana, 2023. "Economic complexity, property rights and the judicial system as drivers of eco-innovations: An analysis of OECD countries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Dan & Zhu, Qing, 2022. "Innovation in emerging economies: Research on the digital economy driving high-quality green development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 801-813.
    2. Taqdees Fatima & Bingxiang Li & Shahab Alam Malik & Dan Zhang, 2023. "The Spatial Effect of Industrial Intelligence on High-Quality Green Development of Industry under Environmental Regulations and Low Carbon Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Xiuxiu Jiang & Xia Wang & Jia Ren & Zhimin Xie, 2021. "The Nexus between Digital Finance and Economic Development: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Pengju Liu & Yitong Zhang & Shengqi Zhou, 2023. "Has Digital Financial Inclusion Narrowed the Urban–Rural Income Gap? A Study of the Spatial Influence Mechanism Based on Data from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Linxiong Chen & Changbiao Zhong & Chong Li, 2022. "Research on the Impact of the Digital Economy on China’s New-Type Urbanization: Based on Spatial and Mediation Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Feng, Suling & Zhang, Rong & Li, Guoxiang, 2022. "Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 70-83.
    7. Zhu, Qing & Ma, Dan & He, Xin, 2023. "Digital transformation and firms' pollution emissions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    8. Shunbin Zhong & Huafu Shen & Ziheng Niu & Yang Yu & Lin Pan & Yaojun Fan & Atif Jahanger, 2022. "Moving towards Environmental Sustainability: Can Digital Economy Reduce Environmental Degradation in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-23, November.
    9. Xie, Qichang & Ma, Di & Raza, Muhammad Yousaf & Tang, Songlin & Bai, Dingchuan, 2023. "Toward carbon peaking and neutralization: The heterogeneous stochastic convergence of CO2 emissions and the role of digital inclusive finance," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Xiuxiu Jiang & Xia Wang & Jia Ren & Zhimin Xie, 2023. "Digital economy, agglomeration, and entrepreneurship in Chinese cities," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 359-370, January.
    11. PU, Zhengning & FEI, Jinhua, 2022. "The impact of digital finance on residential carbon emissions: Evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 515-527.
    12. Liuhua Fang & Bin Zhao & Wenyu Li & Lixia Tao & Luyao He & Jianyu Zhang & Chuanhao Wen, 2023. "Impact of Digital Finance on Industrial Green Transformation: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Lingzhang Kong & Jinye Li, 2022. "Digital Economy Development and Green Economic Efficiency: Evidence from Province-Level Empirical Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Dongjing Chen & Xiaotong Guo, 2023. "Impact of the Digital Economy and Financial Development on Residents’ Consumption Upgrading: Evidence from Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    15. Song, Quanyun & Li, Jie & Wu, Yu & Yin, Zhichao, 2020. "Accessibility of financial services and household consumption in China: Evidence from micro data," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    16. Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Broekel, Tom & Diodato, Dario & Giuliani, Elisa & Hausmann, Ricardo & O'Clery, Neave & Rigby, David, 2022. "Reprint of The new paradigm of economic complexity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(8).
    17. Wang, Yi-Ran & Ma, Chao-Qun & Ren, Yi-Shuai, 2022. "A model for CBDC audits based on blockchain technology: Learning from the DCEP," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    18. Gallego-Losada, María-Jesús & Montero-Navarro, Antonio & García-Abajo, Elisa & Gallego-Losada, Rocío, 2023. "Digital financial inclusion. Visualizing the academic literature," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Peterson K. Ozili & David Mhlanga & Rym Ammar & Marwa Fersi, 2024. "Information Effect of Fintech and Digital Finance on Financial Inclusion during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Global Evidence," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Kun Wang & Bing Chen & Yuhong Li, 2024. "Technological, process or managerial innovation? How does digital transformation affect green innovation in industrial enterprises?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 1-32, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digital economy; Green innovation; Fiscal decentralization; Spatial spillover;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:ecopln:v:57:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10644-024-09626-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.