IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiapa/v30y2013i1p191-210.html

Individual differences, psychological contract breach, and organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation study

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-Ting Shih

  • Chih-Hsun Chuang

Abstract

This study examines two competing theories. Self-enhancement theory predicts that self-esteem and equity sensitivity (narrow traits) increase the perception of psychological contract breach and engage less in organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), whereas self-consistency theory predicts that these two traits attenuate the perception of psychological contract breach and engage more in OCB. Agreeableness and Conscientiousness (broad traits) are expected to moderate the mediation. This study employs moderated mediation analysis to test a sample of 204 supervisor–subordinate dyads from two theme parks in northern and central Taiwan. The results show that employees high in self-esteem are less likely to perceive psychological contract breach and engage more in OCB, confirming self-consistency theory. The results also show that this mediation is observed when Agreeableness and Conscientiousness are higher than when they are lower. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-Ting Shih & Chih-Hsun Chuang, 2013. "Individual differences, psychological contract breach, and organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation study," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 191-210, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:30:y:2013:i:1:p:191-210
    DOI: 10.1007/s10490-012-9294-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10490-012-9294-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10490-012-9294-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Northcraft, Gregory B. & Ashford, Susan J., 1990. "The preservation of self in everyday life: The effects of performance expectations and feedback context on feedback inquiry," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 42-64, October.
    2. Jackie Coyle‐Shapiro & Ian Kessler, 2000. "Consequences Of The Psychological Contract For The Employment Relationship: A Large Scale Survey," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 903-930, November.
    3. Ying Chen & Ray Friedman & Enhai Yu & Fubin Sun, 2011. "Examining the positive and negative effects of guanxi practices: A multi-level analysis of guanxi practices and procedural justice perceptions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 715-735, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiahong Du & Tim Vantilborgh, 2021. "“Who can I blame and what can I do?”: making sense of psychological contract evaluations between Belgian and Chinese employees," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Leo Huang & Kuang-Yu Chang & Yu-Chen Yeh, 2020. "How Can Travel Agencies Create Sustainable Competitive Advantages? Perspective on Employee Role Stress and Initiative Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Andaç T. Arıkan, 2020. "Opportunism is in the Eye of the Beholder: Antecedents of Subjective Opportunism Judgments," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 573-589, January.
    4. Upasna A Agarwal, 2017. "Linking Psychological Contract Breach, Innovative Work Behaviour And Collectivism: A Moderated Mediation Model," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-31, October.
    5. Cristina López-Duarte & Marta M. Vidal-Suárez & Belén González-Díaz, 2018. "The early adulthood of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management: A literature review 2005–2014," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 313-345, June.
    6. Han, Shuai & Chen, Hong & Long, Ruyin & Jiskani, Izhar Mithal, 2022. "Can miners' social networks affect their safety commitment? A case study of Chinese coal mining enterprises," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Samuel Adams & Fanny Adams Quagrainie & Edem Kwame Mensah Klobodu, 2014. "Psychological contract formation: The influence of demographic factors," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 17(3), pages 279-294, September.
    8. Özgür Demirtaş & Aykut Arslan & Mustafa Karaca, 2019. "Why perceived organizational and supervisory family support is important for organizations? Evidence from the field," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 841-869, August.
    9. Happy Paul & Umesh Kumar Bamel & Pooja Garg, 2016. "Employee Resilience and OCB: Mediating Effects of Organizational Commitment," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 41(4), pages 308-324, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Protsiuk Olga, 2019. "The Relationships Between Psychological Contract Expectations and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Employer Perception," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 85-106, September.
    2. Maximilian Margolin & Marko Reimer & Daniel Schaupp, 2025. "The Effects of Real-Time Feedback on Effort and Performance: Evidence from a Natural Quasi-Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 3558-3582, April.
    3. Chih-Ting Shih & Cheng-Chen Lin, 2014. "From good friends to good soldiers: A psychological contract perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 309-326, March.
    4. Kraak, Johannes Marcelus & Lunardo, Renaud & Herrbach, Olivier & Durrieu, François, 2017. "Promises to employees matter, self-identity too: Effects of psychological contract breach and older worker identity on violation and turnover intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 108-117.
    5. Thomas Zagenczyk & Ray Gibney & W. Few & Kristin Scott, 2011. "Psychological Contracts and Organizational Identification: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Organizational Support," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 254-281, September.
    6. Sally Sambrook & Delia Wainwright, 2010. "The Psychological Contract: Who's Contracting with Whom? Towards a Conceptual Model," Working Papers 10013, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    7. James Kwame Mensah, 2019. "Talent Management and Employee Outcomes: A Psychological Contract Fulfilment Perspective," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 325-344, September.
    8. Chieh-Peng Lin & Chou-Kang Chiu & Na-Ting Liu, 2019. "Developing virtual team performance: an integrated perspective of social exchange and social cognitive theories," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 671-688, August.
    9. Kenneth de Roeck & Nicolas Raineri & David Jones & Sabrina Scheidler, 2024. "Giving the benefit of the doubt: Investigating the insurance-like effect of CSR in mitigating negative employee reactions to psychological contract breach," Post-Print hal-04238140, HAL.
    10. Michael White & Alex Bryson, 2018. "HPWS in the Public Sector: Are There Mutual Gains?," DoQSS Working Papers 18-10, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    11. Anna ROGOZIÑSKA-PAWE£CZYK, 2015. "The Dynamic Character of a Psychological Contract between the Superior and the Employee (According to Empirical Research)," Economia. Seria Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(2), pages 271-284, December.
    12. Antonino Callea & Flavio Urbini & Emanuela Ingusci & Antonio Chirumbolo, 2016. "The relationship between contract type and job satisfaction in a mediated moderation model: The role of job insecurity and psychological contract violation," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 37(2), pages 399-420, May.
    13. Yoshiko DeMotta & Sankar Sen, 2017. "How psychological contracts motivate employer-brand patronage," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 385-395, September.
    14. Yannick Griep & Tim Vantilborgh & Samantha K Jones, 2020. "The relationship between psychological contract breach and counterproductive work behavior in social enterprises: Do paid employees and volunteers differ?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 41(3), pages 727-745, August.
    15. Long Zhang & Yulin Deng & Qun Wang, 2014. "An Exploratory Study of Chinese Motives for Building Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(4), pages 659-675, November.
    16. repec:iim:iimawp:13106 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Shaiful Annuar Khalid & Hassan Ali & Mohammad Ismail & Norshimah Abdul Rahman & Kamsol Mohamed Kassim & Rozihana Shekh Zain, 2009. "Organizational Citizenship Behavior Factor Structure among Employees in Hotel Industry," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Heffernan Margaret & Rochford Eoin, 2017. "Psychological contract breach and turnover intention: the moderating effects of social status and local ties," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 99-115.
    19. Cam Caldwell, 2011. "Duties Owed to Organizational Citizens – Ethical Insights for Today’s Leader," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 343-356, September.
    20. Gregory S. Dawson & Elena Karahanna & Ann Buchholtz, 2014. "A Study of Psychological Contract Breach Spillover in Multiple-Agency Relationships in Consulting Professional Service Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 149-170, February.
    21. Ming-Chuan Yu & Qiang Mai & Sang-Bing Tsai & Yi Dai, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Organizational Trust, Employee-Organization Relationship and Innovative Behavior from the Integrated Perspective of Social Exchange and Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:30:y:2013:i:1:p:191-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.