IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v63y2017i6p2027-2048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tailored Benders Decomposition for a Long-Term Power Expansion Model with Short-Term Demand Response

Author

Listed:
  • Timo Lohmann

    (Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401)

  • Steffen Rebennack

    (Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401)

Abstract

We present a long-term power generation expansion planning model that features a long planning horizon, an hourly time resolution, multiperiod investment and retirement decisions, transmission constraints, start-up restrictions, and short-term demand response. Demand response is the capability of power load to react to short-term changes in electricity prices. It plays an increasingly important role in today’s electricity markets but has not been taken into consideration in long-term power generation expansion planning problems, which mostly treat demand as perfectly inelastic. Given mild assumptions for the underlying demand function, the resulting model is a large-scale, concave, linearly constrained maximization problem. We exploit the model structure by developing a new approach to generalized Benders decomposition (GBD). In particular, we present two algorithmic ideas: (1) solving the nonlinear Benders subproblem as a linear programming (LP) problem with the aid of dynamic linear overestimation, referred to as the LP-based method, and (2) directly calculating all necessary optimal primal and dual variable values, referred to as the calculation-based method. We consider three special cases of our expansion planning model and show that solving mathematical programming problems can become entirely obsolete in the calculation-based method. We demonstrate the efficiency of all proposed algorithms for the Texas power system, comparing our tailored decomposition methods to a monolithic approach and a state-of-the-art GBD implementation. Our LP-based method is up to 3,822 times faster than the monolithic approach and up to 55 times faster than the GBD. The calculation-based method dramatically improves the solution time, being an average factor of 20 faster than solving LPs and 107,074 times faster than the monolithic approach (for the largest solvable instance by a commercial solver). The overall largest instance we solve, containing more than 79 million variables and constraints, converges in less than one minute using the calculation-based method. The modeling language GAMS and its latest features were used to efficiently implement all algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Timo Lohmann & Steffen Rebennack, 2017. "Tailored Benders Decomposition for a Long-Term Power Expansion Model with Short-Term Demand Response," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 2027-2048, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:63:y:2017:i:6:p:2027-2048
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2420
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2420?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. Massé & R. Gibrat, 1957. "Application of Linear Programming to Investments in the Electric Power Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 149-166, January.
    2. Jeremy A. Bloom & Michael Caramanis & Leonid Charny, 1984. "Long-Range Generation Planning Using Generalized Benders' Decomposition: Implementation and Experience," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 290-313, April.
    3. George Gross & David Finlay, 2000. "Generation Supply Bidding in Perfectly Competitive Electricity Markets," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 83-98, May.
    4. Ralf Gollmer & Matthias Nowak & Werner Römisch & Rüdiger Schultz, 2000. "Unit commitment in power generation – a basic model and some extensions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 167-189, November.
    5. Bushnell, James, 2010. "Building Blocks: Investment in Renewable and Non-Renewable Technologies," Staff General Research Papers Archive 31546, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Severin Borenstein, 2005. "The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 93-116.
    7. J. Benders, 2005. "Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 3-19, January.
    8. Fell, Harrison & Linn, Joshua, 2013. "Renewable electricity policies, heterogeneity, and cost effectiveness," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 688-707.
    9. Geoffrey J. Blanford, James H. Merrick, and David Young, 2014. "A Clean Energy Standard Analysis with the US-REGEN Model," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
    10. C. L. Tseng & C. A. Li & S. S. Oren, 2000. "Solving the Unit Commitment Problem by a Unit Decommitment Method," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 707-730, June.
    11. De Wolf, D. & Smeers, Y., 1996. "Optimal dimensioning of pipe networks with application to gas transmission networks," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1249, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    12. Daniel de Wolf & Yves Smeers, 1996. "Optimal Dimensioning of Pipe Networks with Application to Gas Transmission Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 596-608, August.
    13. Cappers, Peter & Goldman, Charles & Kathan, David, 2010. "Demand response in U.S. electricity markets: Empirical evidence," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1526-1535.
    14. Jeremy A. Bloom, 1983. "Solving an Electricity Generating Capacity Expansion Planning Problem by Generalized Benders' Decomposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 84-100, February.
    15. Frederic H. Murphy & Yves Smeers, 2005. "Generation Capacity Expansion in Imperfectly Competitive Restructured Electricity Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 646-661, August.
    16. James Bushnell, 2003. "A Mixed Complementarity Model of Hydrothermal Electricity Competition in the Western United States," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 80-93, February.
    17. Hobbs, Benjamin F., 1995. "Optimization methods for electric utility resource planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 1-20, May.
    18. Guan, Z. & Philpott, A.B., 2011. "A multistage stochastic programming model for the New Zealand dairy industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 289-299, December.
    19. Dennis Anderson, 1972. "Models for Determining Least-Cost Investments in Electricity Supply," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 3(1), pages 267-299, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Motta, Vinicius N. & Anjos, Miguel F. & Gendreau, Michel, 2024. "Survey of optimization models for power system operation and expansion planning with demand response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 401-412.
    2. Sajad Aliakbari Sani & Olivier Bahn & Erick Delage & Rinel Foguen Tchuendom, 2022. "Robust Integration of Electric Vehicles Charging Load in Smart Grid’s Capacity Expansion Planning," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 1010-1041, September.
    3. Aliakbari Sani, Sajad & Bahn, Olivier & Delage, Erick, 2022. "Affine decision rule approximation to address demand response uncertainty in smart Grids’ capacity planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 438-455.
    4. Li, Can & Conejo, Antonio J. & Liu, Peng & Omell, Benjamin P. & Siirola, John D. & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2022. "Mixed-integer linear programming models and algorithms for generation and transmission expansion planning of power systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1071-1082.
    5. Timo Lohmann & Michael R. Bussieck & Lutz Westermann & Steffen Rebennack, 2021. "High-Performance Prototyping of Decomposition Methods in GAMS," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 34-50, January.
    6. Steffen Rebennack & Vitaliy Krasko, 2020. "Piecewise Linear Function Fitting via Mixed-Integer Linear Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 507-530, April.
    7. Li, Longxi, 2021. "Coordination between smart distribution networks and multi-microgrids considering demand side management: A trilevel framework," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Wang, Fengjuan & Xie, Yachen & Xu, Jiuping, 2019. "Reliable-economical equilibrium based short-term scheduling towards hybrid hydro-photovoltaic generation systems: Case study from China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timo Lohmann & Michael R. Bussieck & Lutz Westermann & Steffen Rebennack, 2021. "High-Performance Prototyping of Decomposition Methods in GAMS," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 34-50, January.
    2. De Jonghe, C. & Hobbs, B. F. & Belmans, R., 2011. "Integrating short-term demand response into long-term investment planning," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1132, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Munoz, F.D. & Hobbs, B.F. & Watson, J.-P., 2016. "New bounding and decomposition approaches for MILP investment problems: Multi-area transmission and generation planning under policy constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 888-898.
    4. James H. Merrick & John E. T. Bistline & Geoffrey J. Blanford, 2021. "On representation of energy storage in electricity planning models," Papers 2105.03707, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    5. Pineau, Pierre-Olivier & Rasata, Hasina & Zaccour, Georges, 2011. "Impact of some parameters on investments in oligopolistic electricity markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 180-195, August.
    6. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z. & Fleming, Peter J., 2017. "Generation expansion planning optimisation with renewable energy integration: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 790-803.
    7. Francisco Munoz & Jean-Paul Watson, 2015. "A scalable solution framework for stochastic transmission and generation planning problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 491-518, October.
    8. Gacitua, L. & Gallegos, P. & Henriquez-Auba, R. & Lorca, Á. & Negrete-Pincetic, M. & Olivares, D. & Valenzuela, A. & Wenzel, G., 2018. "A comprehensive review on expansion planning: Models and tools for energy policy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 346-360.
    9. Zong Woo Geem & Jin-Hong Kim, 2016. "Optimal Energy Mix with Renewable Portfolio Standards in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Gal, Nurit & Milstein, Irena & Tishler, Asher & Woo, C.K., 2017. "Fuel cost uncertainty, capacity investment and price in a competitive electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 233-240.
    11. Christian Gambardella & Michael Pahle & Wolf-Peter Schill, 2016. "Do Benefits from Dynamic Tariffing Rise? Welfare Effects of Real-Time Pricing under Carbon-Tax-Induced Variable Renewable Energy Supply," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1621, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    12. Olivier Massol, 2011. "A Cost Function for the Natural Gas Transmission Industry: Further Considerations," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 95-122.
    13. Daniel de Wolf, 2017. "Mathematical Properties of Formulations of the Gas Transmission Problem," Post-Print halshs-02396747, HAL.
    14. Steven A. Gabriel & Supat Kiet & Jifang Zhuang, 2005. "A Mixed Complementarity-Based Equilibrium Model of Natural Gas Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 799-818, October.
    15. Liang, Yingzong & Hui, Chi Wai, 2018. "Convexification for natural gas transmission networks optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1001-1016.
    16. Mengying Xue & Tianhu Deng & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2019. "Optimizing natural gas pipeline transmission with nonuniform elevation: A new initialization approach," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(7), pages 547-564, October.
    17. Pahle, Michael & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Gambardella, Christian & Tietjen, Oliver, 2016. "Renewable Energy Support, Negative Prices, and Real-time Pricing," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 37, pages 147-169.
    18. Thapalia, Biju K. & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Kaut, Michal & Wallace, Stein W., 2012. "Single-commodity network design with random edge capacities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 394-403.
    19. Aliakbari Sani, Sajad & Bahn, Olivier & Delage, Erick, 2022. "Affine decision rule approximation to address demand response uncertainty in smart Grids’ capacity planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 438-455.
    20. Dieckhoener, Caroline, 2010. "Simulating security of supply effects of the Nabucco and South Stream projects for the European natural gas market," EWI Working Papers 2010-7, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI), revised 21 Jan 2012.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:63:y:2017:i:6:p:2027-2048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.