IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v312y2024i2p401-412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survey of optimization models for power system operation and expansion planning with demand response

Author

Listed:
  • Motta, Vinicius N.
  • Anjos, Miguel F.
  • Gendreau, Michel

Abstract

With the implementation of demand response programs and its increasing penetration in the power grid, various new challenges to the grid’s operation have emerged. As a consequence, optimizing the operation of the power grid and the allocation of demand response resources, in the short-term, medium-term and long-term, has become a fundamental problem. This survey presents a review of the optimization approaches in the literature for the integration of DR in three central problems in power systems planning, namely optimal power flow, unit commitment, and generation and transmission expansion planning. We also highlight important future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Motta, Vinicius N. & Anjos, Miguel F. & Gendreau, Michel, 2024. "Survey of optimization models for power system operation and expansion planning with demand response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 401-412.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:312:y:2024:i:2:p:401-412
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.01.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723000383
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.01.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hemmati, Reza & Hooshmand, Rahmat-Allah & Khodabakhshian, Amin, 2013. "State-of-the-art of transmission expansion planning: Comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 312-319.
    2. Jiafu Yin & Dongmei Zhao, 2018. "Fuzzy Stochastic Unit Commitment Model with Wind Power and Demand Response under Conditional Value-At-Risk Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Stephen Frank & Steffen Rebennack, 2016. "An introduction to optimal power flow: Theory, formulation, and examples," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(12), pages 1172-1197, December.
    4. Carreiro, Andreia M. & Jorge, Humberto M. & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler, 2017. "Energy management systems aggregators: A literature survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1160-1172.
    5. Hajibandeh, Neda & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Osório, Gerardo J. & Aghaei, Jamshid & Catalão, João P.S., 2018. "A heuristic multi-objective multi-criteria demand response planning in a system with high penetration of wind power generators," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 721-732.
    6. Azizipanah-Abarghooee, Rasoul & Golestaneh, Faranak & Gooi, Hoay Beng & Lin, Jeremy & Bavafa, Farhad & Terzija, Vladimir, 2016. "Corrective economic dispatch and operational cycles for probabilistic unit commitment with demand response and high wind power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 634-651.
    7. Beibei Wang & Xiaocong Liu & Feng Zhu & Xiaoqing Hu & Wenlu Ji & Shengchun Yang & Ke Wang & Shuhai Feng, 2015. "Unit Commitment Model Considering Flexible Scheduling of Demand Response for High Wind Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Yu-Qing Bao & Yang Li & Beibei Wang & Minqiang Hu & Yanmin Zhou, 2017. "Day-Ahead Scheduling Considering Demand Response as a Frequency Control Resource," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Feihu Hu & Xuan Feng & Hui Cao, 2018. "A Short-Term Decision Model for Electricity Retailers: Electricity Procurement and Time-of-Use Pricing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Hu, Ming-Che & Lu, Su-Ying & Chen, Yen-Haw, 2016. "Stochastic–multiobjective market equilibrium analysis of a demand response program in energy market under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 500-506.
    11. Timo Lohmann & Steffen Rebennack, 2017. "Tailored Benders Decomposition for a Long-Term Power Expansion Model with Short-Term Demand Response," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 2027-2048, June.
    12. Alexander Kies & Bruno U. Schyska & Lueder Von Bremen, 2016. "The Demand Side Management Potential to Balance a Highly Renewable European Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Siqing Sheng & Qing Gu, 2019. "A Day-ahead and Day-in Decision Model Considering the Uncertainty of Multiple Kinds of Demand Response," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Malik, Arif S., 2007. "Impact on power planning due to demand-side management (DSM) in commercial and government sectors with rebound effect—A case study of central grid of Oman," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 2157-2166.
    15. Amir Sadegh Zakeri & Hossein Askarian Abyaneh, 2017. "Transmission Expansion Planning Using TLBO Algorithm in the Presence of Demand Response Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    16. Furukakoi, Masahiro & Adewuyi, Oludamilare Bode & Matayoshi, Hidehito & Howlader, Abdul Motin & Senjyu, Tomonobu, 2018. "Multi objective unit commitment with voltage stability and PV uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 618-623.
    17. M Jenabi & S M T Fatemi Ghomi & S A Torabi & S H Hosseinian, 2013. "A Benders decomposition algorithm for a multi-area, multi-stage integrated resource planning in power systems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(8), pages 1118-1136, August.
    18. Nolan, Sheila & Devine, Mel & Lynch, Muireann A. & O’Malley, Mark, 2017. "The effect of Demand Response and wind generation on electricity investment and operation," Papers WP577, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    19. Zhang, Ning & Hu, Zhaoguang & Shen, Bo & Dang, Shuping & Zhang, Jian & Zhou, Yuhui, 2016. "A source–grid–load coordinated power planning model considering the integration of wind power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 13-24.
    20. W. Ackooij & I. Danti Lopez & A. Frangioni & F. Lacalandra & M. Tahanan, 2018. "Large-scale unit commitment under uncertainty: an updated literature survey," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(1), pages 11-85, December.
    21. Li, Peng & Wang, Zixuan & Wang, Jiahao & Yang, Weihong & Guo, Tianyu & Yin, Yunxing, 2021. "Two-stage optimal operation of integrated energy system considering multiple uncertainties and integrated demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    22. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Dagoumas, Athanasios S., 2018. "State-of-the-art generation expansion planning: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 563-589.
    23. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1959. "Chance-Constrained Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 73-79, October.
    24. Shariatzadeh, Farshid & Mandal, Paras & Srivastava, Anurag K., 2015. "Demand response for sustainable energy systems: A review, application and implementation strategy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 343-350.
    25. Zeng, Bo & Wei, Xuan & Zhao, Dongbo & Singh, Chanan & Zhang, Jianhua, 2018. "Hybrid probabilistic-possibilistic approach for capacity credit evaluation of demand response considering both exogenous and endogenous uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 186-200.
    26. Abdi, Hamdi & Beigvand, Soheil Derafshi & Scala, Massimo La, 2017. "A review of optimal power flow studies applied to smart grids and microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 742-766.
    27. Anjo, João & Neves, Diana & Silva, Carlos & Shivakumar, Abhishek & Howells, Mark, 2018. "Modeling the long-term impact of demand response in energy planning: The Portuguese electric system case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 456-468.
    28. Héctor Marañón-Ledesma & Asgeir Tomasgard, 2019. "Analyzing Demand Response in a Dynamic Capacity Expansion Model for the European Power Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, August.
    29. Kwag, Hyung-Geun & Kim, Jin-O, 2012. "Optimal combined scheduling of generation and demand response with demand resource constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 161-170.
    30. Guerra, Omar J. & Tejada, Diego A. & Reklaitis, Gintaras V., 2016. "An optimization framework for the integrated planning of generation and transmission expansion in interconnected power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1-21.
    31. Bai, Linquan & Li, Fangxing & Cui, Hantao & Jiang, Tao & Sun, Hongbin & Zhu, Jinxiang, 2016. "Interval optimization based operating strategy for gas-electricity integrated energy systems considering demand response and wind uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 270-279.
    32. Rodríguez, Jesús A. & Anjos, Miguel F. & Côté, Pascal & Desaulniers, Guy, 2021. "Accelerating Benders decomposition for short-term hydropower maintenance scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 240-253.
    33. Jiang, Bo & Muzhikyan, Aramazd & Farid, Amro M. & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2017. "Demand side management in power grid enterprise control: A comparison of industrial & social welfare approaches," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 833-846.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohseni, Soheil & Brent, Alan C. & Kelly, Scott & Browne, Will N., 2022. "Demand response-integrated investment and operational planning of renewable and sustainable energy systems considering forecast uncertainties: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula, 2019. "Review and assessment of the different categories of demand response potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 280-294.
    3. Li, Can & Conejo, Antonio J. & Liu, Peng & Omell, Benjamin P. & Siirola, John D. & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2022. "Mixed-integer linear programming models and algorithms for generation and transmission expansion planning of power systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1071-1082.
    4. Aliakbari Sani, Sajad & Bahn, Olivier & Delage, Erick, 2022. "Affine decision rule approximation to address demand response uncertainty in smart Grids’ capacity planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 438-455.
    5. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula & Vaz, A. Ismael F., 2021. "A review of co-optimization approaches for operational and planning problems in the energy sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    6. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Dagoumas, Athanasios S., 2018. "State-of-the-art generation expansion planning: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 563-589.
    7. Muhammad Saeed Uz Zaman & Syed Basit Ali Bukhari & Khalid Mousa Hazazi & Zunaib Maqsood Haider & Raza Haider & Chul-Hwan Kim, 2018. "Frequency Response Analysis of a Single-Area Power System with a Modified LFC Model Considering Demand Response and Virtual Inertia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Sadeghi, Hadi & Rashidinejad, Masoud & Abdollahi, Amir, 2017. "A comprehensive sequential review study through the generation expansion planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1369-1394.
    9. Morales-España, Germán & Martínez-Gordón, Rafael & Sijm, Jos, 2022. "Classifying and modelling demand response in power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    10. Moradi-Sepahvand, Mojtaba & Amraee, Turaj, 2021. "Integrated expansion planning of electric energy generation, transmission, and storage for handling high shares of wind and solar power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    11. Jiang, Sufan & Gao, Shan & Pan, Guangsheng & Zhao, Xin & Liu, Yu & Guo, Yasen & Wang, Sicheng, 2020. "A novel robust security constrained unit commitment model considering HVDC regulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    12. Constantino Dário Justo & José Eduardo Tafula & Pedro Moura, 2022. "Planning Sustainable Energy Systems in the Southern African Development Community: A Review of Power Systems Planning Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    13. Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Lynch, Muireann & Bertsch, Valentin, 2020. "Power system impacts of community acceptance policies for renewable energy deployment under storage cost uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 893-912.
    14. Backe, Stian & Zwickl-Bernhard, Sebastian & Schwabeneder, Daniel & Auer, Hans & Korpås, Magnus & Tomasgard, Asgeir, 2022. "Impact of energy communities on the European electricity and heating system decarbonization pathway: Comparing local and global flexibility responses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    15. Wogrin, S. & Tejada-Arango, D. & Delikaraoglou, S. & Botterud, A., 2020. "Assessing the impact of inertia and reactive power constraints in generation expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    16. Märkle-Huß, Joscha & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Neumann, Dirk, 2018. "Large-scale demand response and its implications for spot prices, load and policies: Insights from the German-Austrian electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1290-1298.
    17. Wang, Fei & Xu, Hanchen & Xu, Ti & Li, Kangping & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João. P.S., 2017. "The values of market-based demand response on improving power system reliability under extreme circumstances," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 220-231.
    18. Timo Lohmann & Michael R. Bussieck & Lutz Westermann & Steffen Rebennack, 2021. "High-Performance Prototyping of Decomposition Methods in GAMS," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 34-50, January.
    19. Kirchem, Dana & Lynch, Muireann Á. & Bertsch, Valentin & Casey, Eoin, 2020. "Modelling demand response with process models and energy systems models: Potential applications for wastewater treatment within the energy-water nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    20. Liu, Youbo & Zuo, Kunyu & Liu, Xueqin (Amy) & Liu, Junyong & Kennedy, Jason M., 2018. "Dynamic pricing for decentralized energy trading in micro-grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 689-699.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:312:y:2024:i:2:p:401-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.