IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i9p1376-d111552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transmission Expansion Planning Using TLBO Algorithm in the Presence of Demand Response Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Amir Sadegh Zakeri

    (Tehran Polytechnic, Amirkabir University of Technology, 424 Hafez Ave, 159163-4311 Tehran, Iran)

  • Hossein Askarian Abyaneh

    (Tehran Polytechnic, Amirkabir University of Technology, 424 Hafez Ave, 159163-4311 Tehran, Iran)

Abstract

Transmission Expansion Planning (TEP) involves determining if and how transmission lines should be added to the power grid so that the operational and investment costs are minimized. TEP is a major issue in smart grid development, where demand response resources affect short- and long-term power system decisions, and these in turn, affect TEP. First, this paper discusses the effects of demand response programs on reducing the final costs of a system in TEP. Then, the TEP problem is solved using a Teaching Learning Based Optimization (TLBO) algorithm taking into consideration power generation costs, power loss, and line construction costs. Simulation results show the optimal effect of demand response programs on postponing the additional cost of investments for supplying peak load.

Suggested Citation

  • Amir Sadegh Zakeri & Hossein Askarian Abyaneh, 2017. "Transmission Expansion Planning Using TLBO Algorithm in the Presence of Demand Response Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:9:p:1376-:d:111552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/9/1376/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/9/1376/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moghaddam, M. Parsa & Abdollahi, A. & Rashidinejad, M., 2011. "Flexible demand response programs modeling in competitive electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(9), pages 3257-3269.
    2. Munoz, F.D. & Hobbs, B.F. & Watson, J.-P., 2016. "New bounding and decomposition approaches for MILP investment problems: Multi-area transmission and generation planning under policy constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 888-898.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Motta, Vinicius N. & Anjos, Miguel F. & Gendreau, Michel, 2024. "Survey of optimization models for power system operation and expansion planning with demand response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 401-412.
    2. Yuhong Wang & Lei Chen & Hong Zhou & Xu Zhou & Zongsheng Zheng & Qi Zeng & Li Jiang & Liang Lu, 2021. "Flexible Transmission Network Expansion Planning Based on DQN Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Muhammad Saeed Uz Zaman & Syed Basit Ali Bukhari & Khalid Mousa Hazazi & Zunaib Maqsood Haider & Raza Haider & Chul-Hwan Kim, 2018. "Frequency Response Analysis of a Single-Area Power System with a Modified LFC Model Considering Demand Response and Virtual Inertia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Deb, Sanchari & Gao, Xiao-Zhi & Tammi, Kari & Kalita, Karuna & Mahanta, Pinakeswar, 2021. "A novel chicken swarm and teaching learning based algorithm for electric vehicle charging station placement problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rong, Aiying & Lahdelma, Risto, 2017. "An efficient model and algorithm for the transmission-constrained multi-site combined heat and power system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 1106-1117.
    2. Xinhui Lu & Kaile Zhou & Felix T. S. Chan & Shanlin Yang, 2017. "Optimal scheduling of household appliances for smart home energy management considering demand response," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(3), pages 1639-1653, September.
    3. Xin-Rui Liu & Si-Luo Sun & Qiu-Ye Sun & Wei-Yang Zhong, 2020. "Time-Scale Economic Dispatch of Electricity-Heat Integrated System Based on Users’ Thermal Comfort," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Keon Baek & Woong Ko & Jinho Kim, 2019. "Optimal Scheduling of Distributed Energy Resources in Residential Building under the Demand Response Commitment Contract," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. James H. Merrick & John E. T. Bistline & Geoffrey J. Blanford, 2021. "On representation of energy storage in electricity planning models," Papers 2105.03707, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    6. Sandoval, Diego & Goffin, Philippe & Leibundgut, Hansjürg, 2017. "How low exergy buildings and distributed electricity storage can contribute to flexibility within the demand side," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 116-127.
    7. Zheng, Menglian & Meinrenken, Christoph J. & Lackner, Klaus S., 2014. "Agent-based model for electricity consumption and storage to evaluate economic viability of tariff arbitrage for residential sector demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 297-306.
    8. Dehnavi, Ehsan & Abdi, Hamdi, 2016. "Optimal pricing in time of use demand response by integrating with dynamic economic dispatch problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1086-1094.
    9. Sarid, A. & Tzur, M., 2018. "The multi-scale generation and transmission expansion model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 977-991.
    10. Go, Roderick S. & Munoz, Francisco D. & Watson, Jean-Paul, 2016. "Assessing the economic value of co-optimized grid-scale energy storage investments in supporting high renewable portfolio standards," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 902-913.
    11. Wang, Fei & Ge, Xinxin & Yang, Peng & Li, Kangping & Mi, Zengqiang & Siano, Pierluigi & Duić, Neven, 2020. "Day-ahead optimal bidding and scheduling strategies for DER aggregator considering responsive uncertainty under real-time pricing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    12. Woo, C.K. & Sreedharan, P. & Hargreaves, J. & Kahrl, F. & Wang, J. & Horowitz, I., 2014. "A review of electricity product differentiation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 262-272.
    13. Moiseeva, Ekaterina & Wogrin, Sonja & Hesamzadeh, Mohammad Reza, 2017. "Generation flexibility in ramp rates: Strategic behavior and lessons for electricity market design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 755-771.
    14. Woo, C.K. & Li, R. & Shiu, A. & Horowitz, I., 2013. "Residential winter kWh responsiveness under optional time-varying pricing in British Columbia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 288-297.
    15. Antonio Gabaldón & Carlos Álvarez & María Del Carmen Ruiz-Abellón & Antonio Guillamón & Sergio Valero-Verdú & Roque Molina & Ana García-Garre, 2018. "Integration of Methodologies for the Evaluation of Offer Curves in Energy and Capacity Markets through Energy Efficiency and Demand Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-27, February.
    16. Seshu Kumar, R. & Phani Raghav, L. & Koteswara Raju, D. & Singh, Arvind R., 2021. "Impact of multiple demand side management programs on the optimal operation of grid-connected microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    17. Li, Lanlan & Gong, Chengzhu & Wang, Deyun & Zhu, Kejun, 2013. "Multi-agent simulation of the time-of-use pricing policy in an urban natural gas pipeline network: A case study of Zhengzhou," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 37-43.
    18. Katz, Jonas & Andersen, Frits Møller & Morthorst, Poul Erik, 2016. "Load-shift incentives for household demand response: Evaluation of hourly dynamic pricing and rebate schemes in a wind-based electricity system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1602-1616.
    19. Doostizadeh, Meysam & Ghasemi, Hassan, 2012. "A day-ahead electricity pricing model based on smart metering and demand-side management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 221-230.
    20. Ho-Sung Ryu & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2020. "Two-Stage Optimal Microgrid Operation with a Risk-Based Hybrid Demand Response Program Considering Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:9:p:1376-:d:111552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.