IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v25y2014i2p285-306.html

Selling vs. Profiling: Optimizing the Offer Set in Web-Based Personalization

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Johar

    (Belk College of Business, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223)

  • Vijay Mookerjee

    (Naveen Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

  • Sumit Sarkar

    (Naveen Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

Abstract

We study the problem of optimally choosing the composition of the offer set for firms engaging in web-based personalization. A firm can offer items or links that are targeted for immediate sales based on what is already known about a customer's profile. Alternatively, the firm can offer items directed at learning a customer's preferences. This, in turn, can help the firm make improved recommendations for the remainder of the engagement period with the customer. An important decision problem faced by a profit maximizing firm is what proportion of the offer set should be targeted toward immediate sales and what proportion toward learning the customer's profile. We study the problem as an optimal control model, and characterize the solution. Our findings can help firms decide how to vary the size and composition of the offer set during the course of a customer's engagement period with the firm. The benefits of the proposed approach are illustrated for different patterns of engagement, including the length of the engagement period, uncertainty in the length of the period, and the frequency of the customer's visits to the firm. We also study the scenario where the firm optimizes the size of the offer set during the planning horizon. One of the most important insights of this study is that frequent visits to the firm's website are extremely important for an e-tailing firm even though the customer may not always buy products during these visits.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Johar & Vijay Mookerjee & Sumit Sarkar, 2014. "Selling vs. Profiling: Optimizing the Offer Set in Web-Based Personalization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 285-306, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:285-306
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2014.0518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0518
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2014.0518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Radha Mookerjee & Subodha Kumar & Vijay S. Mookerjee, 2012. "To Show or Not Show: Using User Profiling to Manage Internet Advertisement Campaigns at Chitika," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 449-464, October.
    2. Felipe Caro & Jérémie Gallien, 2007. "Dynamic Assortment with Demand Learning for Seasonal Consumer Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 276-292, February.
    3. B. P. S. Murthi & Sumit Sarkar, 2003. "The Role of the Management Sciences in Research on Personalization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1344-1362, October.
    4. Alan L. Montgomery, 2001. "Applying Quantitative Marketing Techniques to the Internet," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 90-108, April.
    5. Pelin Atahan & Sumit Sarkar, 2011. "Accelerated Learning of User Profiles," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 215-239, February.
    6. David C. Schmittlein & Donald G. Morrison & Richard Colombo, 1987. "Counting Your Customers: Who-Are They and What Will They Do Next?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Peter S. Fader & Bruce G. S. Hardie & Ka Lok Lee, 2005. "“Counting Your Customers” the Easy Way: An Alternative to the Pareto/NBD Model," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 275-284, August.
    8. M. L. Vidale & H. B. Wolfe, 1957. "An Operations-Research Study of Sales Response to Advertising," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 370-381, June.
    9. Kar Yan Tam & Shuk Ying Ho, 2005. "Web Personalization as a Persuasion Strategy: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 271-291, September.
    10. Peter J. Lenk & Wayne S. DeSarbo & Paul E. Green & Martin R. Young, 1996. "Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Recovery of Partworth Heterogeneity from Reduced Experimental Designs," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 173-191.
    11. Gerald Häubl & Valerie Trifts, 2000. "Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 4-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Chao & Ding, Yi & Hu, Weihao & Jiang, Yi & Li, Yongzhen, 2021. "Cost-Based attraction recommendation for tour operators under stochastic demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. He, Xiang & Li, Michael Z.F. & Li, Li & Li, Jing & Hu, Jiao, 2024. "Competitive pricing and advertising strategies for online retailers with “showrooming” and “webrooming”," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 617-638.
    3. Yunhui Huang & Kai H. Lim & Zhijie Lin & Shunping Han, 2019. "Large Online Product Catalog Space Indicates High Store Price: Understanding Customers’ Overgeneralization and Illogical Inference," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 963-979, September.
    4. Zhiling Guo & Jin Li & Ram Ramesh, 2019. "Optimal Management of Virtual Infrastructures Under Flexible Cloud Service Agreements," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1424-1446, April.
    5. Juan Liu & Weijun Zhong & Jianqiang Zhang & Shu’e Mei, 2024. "The effectiveness of cross-platform targeted advertising strategy," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2831-2847, December.
    6. Grigorios, Lamprinakos & Magrizos, Solon & Kostopoulos, Ioannis & Drossos, Dimitrios & Santos, David, 2022. "Overt and covert customer data collection in online personalized advertising: The role of user emotions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 308-320.
    7. Canhoto, Ana Isabel & Clear, Fintan, 2020. "Artificial intelligence and machine learning as business tools: A framework for diagnosing value destruction potential," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 183-193.
    8. Felipe Thomaz & Carolina Salge & Elena Karahanna & John Hulland, 2020. "Learning from the Dark Web: leveraging conversational agents in the era of hyper-privacy to enhance marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 43-63, January.
    9. Dominick Werner & Martin Adam & Alexander Benlian, 2022. "Empowering users to control ads and its effects on website stickiness," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1373-1397, September.
    10. Esther Gal-Or & Ronen Gal-Or & Nabita Penmetsa, 2018. "The Role of User Privacy Concerns in Shaping Competition Among Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 698-722, September.
    11. LaBrie, Ryan C. & Steinke, Gerhard H. & Li, Xiangmin & Cazier, Joseph A., 2018. "Big data analytics sentiment: US-China reaction to data collection by business and government," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 45-55.
    12. Fatemeh Mariam Zahedi & Yan Chen & Huimin Zhao, 2024. "Ontology-Based Intelligent Interface Personalization for Protection Against Phishing Attacks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1463-1478, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaiswal, Anand K. & Niraj, Rakesh & Park, Chang Hee & Agarwal, Manoj K., 2018. "The effect of relationship and transactional characteristics on customer retention in emerging online markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 25-35.
    2. Bleier, Alexander & Eisenbeiss, Maik, 2015. "The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 390-409.
    3. Sriram Thirumalai & Kingshuk K. Sinha, 2013. "To Personalize or Not to Personalize Online Purchase Interactions: Implications of Self-Selection by Retailers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 683-708, September.
    4. Daniel Zeng & Yong Liu & Ping Yan & Yanwu Yang, 2021. "Location-Aware Real-Time Recommender Systems for Brick-and-Mortar Retailers," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1608-1623, October.
    5. van Oest, Rutger & Knox, George, 2011. "Extending the BG/NBD: A simple model of purchases and complaints," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 30-37.
    6. Chou, Ping & Chuang, Howard Hao-Chun & Chou, Yen-Chun & Liang, Ting-Peng, 2022. "Predictive analytics for customer repurchase: Interdisciplinary integration of buy till you die modeling and machine learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 635-651.
    7. Meade, Nigel & Islam, Towhidul, 2010. "Using copulas to model repeat purchase behaviour - An exploratory analysis via a case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 908-917, February.
    8. Nina Angelovska, 2021. "Analysis Of Customer Activity, The Importance Of Timing For Effective Marketing Actions: Case Of Group Buying Site, Grouper," UTMS Journal of Economics, University of Tourism and Management, Skopje, Macedonia, vol. 12(2), pages 156-170.
    9. Tran, Trang P., 2017. "Personalized ads on Facebook: An effective marketing tool for online marketers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 230-242.
    10. Jonathan Z. Zhang & Chun-Wei Chang, 2021. "Consumer dynamics: theories, methods, and emerging directions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 166-196, January.
    11. Jerath, Kinshuk & Fader, Peter S. & Hardie, Bruce G.S., 2016. "Customer-base analysis using repeated cross-sectional summary (RCSS) data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 340-350.
    12. Pablo Marshall, 2015. "A simple heuristic for obtaining pareto/NBD parameter estimates," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 165-173, June.
    13. Alina Ferecatu & Arnaud Bruyn & Prithwiraj Mukherjee, 2024. "Silently killing your panelists one email at a time: The true cost of email solicitations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1216-1239, July.
    14. Dengpan Liu & Sumit Sarkar & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2010. "Resource Allocation Policies for Personalization in Content Delivery Sites," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 227-248, June.
    15. Rajkumar Venkatesan & Alexander Bleier & Werner Reinartz & Nalini Ravishanker, 2019. "Improving customer profit predictions with customer mindset metrics through multiple overimputation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 771-794, September.
    16. Park, Chang Hee & Park, Young-Hoon & Schweidel, David A., 2014. "A multi-category customer base analysis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 266-279.
    17. B. P. S. Murthi & Sumit Sarkar, 2003. "The Role of the Mangement Sciences in Research on Personalization," Review of Marketing Science Working Papers 2-2-1025, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    18. Eva Ascarza & Scott A. Neslin & Oded Netzer & Zachery Anderson & Peter S. Fader & Sunil Gupta & Bruce G. S. Hardie & Aurélie Lemmens & Barak Libai & David Neal & Foster Provost & Rom Schrift, 2018. "In Pursuit of Enhanced Customer Retention Management: Review, Key Issues, and Future Directions," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 5(1), pages 65-81, March.
    19. Audzeyeva, Alena & Summers, Barbara & Schenk-Hoppé, Klaus Reiner, 2012. "Forecasting customer behaviour in a multi-service financial organisation: A profitability perspective," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 507-518.
    20. Reutterer, Thomas & Platzer, Michael & Schröder, Nadine, 2021. "Leveraging purchase regularity for predicting customer behavior the easy way," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 194-215.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:285-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.