IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijmsjn/v8y2016i4p87-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Extended Model of Behavioural Process in Consumer Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Nagasimha Balakrishna Kanagal

Abstract

The stimulus response model of consumer behaviour is useful to understand the buying behaviour of individual consumers in the context of individuals buying consumer products. An extended stimulus-response model of behavioural processes in consumer decision making is proposed that serves to integrate the influences and interlinkages of buyer psychology, various buyer characteristics, and the impact of the buyer decision process on consumer decision making. The model proposes that the behavioural process of consumer decision making be as a result of the interaction of three aspects of individual buyer behaviour: communication sensitivity; enculturated individuality; and rational / economic decision making. The paper addresses the flip side of the consumer decision making process in terms of the five stages of decision making from need recognition to post-purchase satisfaction. An aggregate level framework of behavioural process in consumer decision making has been provided, that could lead to a richer analysis of micro level factors and relationships influencing consumer decision behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Nagasimha Balakrishna Kanagal, 2016. "An Extended Model of Behavioural Process in Consumer Decision Making," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(4), pages 87-93, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijmsjn:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:87-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijms/article/view/60337/33167
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijms/article/view/60337
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miniard, Paul W & Cohen, Joel B, 1983. "Modeling Personal and Normative Influences on Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 169-180, September.
    2. Olshavsky, Richard W & Granbois, Donald H, 1979. "Consumer Decision Making-Fact or Fiction?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 6(2), pages 93-100, Se.
    3. Punj, Girish N & Stewart, David W, 1983. "An Interaction Framework of Consumer Decision Making," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 181-196, September.
    4. Landon, Stuart & Smith, Constance, 1997. "The Use of Quality and Reputation Indicators by Consumers: The Case of Bordeaux Wine," MPRA Paper 9283, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alfonso Pellegrino & Masato Abe, 2023. "Leveraging Social Media for SMEs: Findings from a Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mueller, Michel G. & de Haan, Peter, 2009. "How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars--Part I: Model structure, simulation of bounded rationality, and model validation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1072-1082, March.
    2. Michelle Haynes & Steve Thompson, 2012. "The Economic Significance of User-Generated Feedback," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 153-166, February.
    3. Hans Schenk, 1996. "Bandwagon mergers, international competitiveness, and government policy," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 23(3), pages 255-278, October.
    4. Vincent Hoang & Takao Iida & Shigeru Matsumoto & Natsuki Watanabe & Clevo Wilson, 2016. "Consumer’s comparison between local and imported organic products: a hedonic analysis of the Japanese table wine market," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 405-415, December.
    5. Stylos, Nikolaos & Vassiliadis, Chris A. & Bellou, Victoria & Andronikidis, Andreas, 2016. "Destination images, holistic images and personal normative beliefs: Predictors of intention to revisit a destination," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 40-60.
    6. Marty Stuebs & Li Sun, 2010. "Business Reputation and Labor Efficiency, Productivity, and Cost," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 265-283, October.
    7. Teuber, Ramona & Herrmann, Roland, 2012. "Towards a differentiated modeling of origin effects in hedonic analysis: An application to auction prices of specialty coffee," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 732-740.
    8. Donnet, M. Laura & Weatherspoon, Dave D., 2006. "Effect of Sensory and Reputation Quality Attributes on Specialty Coffee Prices," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21388, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Anthony William Bennett & Simone Mueller Loose, 2023. "Benchmarking Economic Sustainability: What Factors Explain Heterogeneity Between Wine Businesses?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Günter Schamel & Kym Anderson, 2019. "Wine Quality and Varietal, Regional and Winery Reputations: Hedonic Prices for Australia and New Zealand," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kym Anderson (ed.), The International Economics of Wine, chapter 10, pages 225-253, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. East, Robert & Hogg, Annik, 2000. "Advertising for economic change," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 577-590, October.
    12. Alden, Dana L. & He, Yi & Chen, Qimei, 2010. "Service recommendations and customer evaluations in the international marketplace: Cultural and situational contingencies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 38-44, January.
    13. Nayeem, Tahmid & Casidy, Riza, 2015. "Australian consumers' decision-making styles for everyday products," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 67-74.
    14. Nicolas G鲡rd Vaillant & François-Charles Wolff, 2013. "Understanding how experts rate cigars: a ‘havanometric’ analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 99-109, January.
    15. Schamel, Günter, 2005. "German Wine: Measurement and Evaluation of Product Quality," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 40, March.
    16. Beckert, Jens & Rössel, Jörg & Schenk, Patrick, 2014. "Wine as a cultural product: Symbolic capital and price formation in the wine field," MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    17. Lascu, Dana-Nicoleta & Bearden, William O. & Rose, Randall L., 1995. "Norm extremity and interpersonal influences on consumer conformity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 201-212, March.
    18. Hyunjung Choi & Doocheol Moon & Andres Guiral & Byungchul Choi, 2021. "Corporate sustainability and the market pricing of accounting numbers," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1117-1126, May.
    19. Luigi Benfratello & Massimiliano Piacenza & Stefano Sacchetto, 2004. "-What Drives Market Prices in the Wine Industry ? Estimation of a Hedonic Model for Italian Premium Wines," CERIS Working Paper 200411, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    20. Ven van de, B. & Graafland, J.J., 2006. "Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility," MPRA Paper 20278, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    communication sensitivity; enculturated individuality; rational / economic decision making; behavioural process; consumer decision making;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijmsjn:v:8:y:2016:i:4:p:87-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.