IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i1p152-d88348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Siting of Carsharing Stations Based on Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation: A Case Study of Shanghai EVCARD

Author

Listed:
  • Wenxiang Li

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China
    College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Ye Li

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China
    College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Jing Fan

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China
    College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

  • Haopeng Deng

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China
    College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China)

Abstract

Carsharing is one of the effective ways to relieve the problems of traffic jams, parking difficulties, and air pollution. In recent years, the numbers of carsharing services and their members have remarkably increased around the world. The project of electric carsharing in Shanghai, called EVCARD, has also developed rapidly with very large demand and supply. Aiming to determine the optimal locations of future stations of the EVCARD, this research employs a novel method combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and geographical information system (GIS) with big data. Potential users, potential travel demand, potential travel purposes, and distance from existing stations are selected as the decision criteria. A siting decision system is established, consisting of 15 evaluation indicators which are calculated from multi-source data on mobile phones, taxi trajectory, point of interests (POI), and the EVCARD operation. The method of the AHP is used to determine the indicator weights, and the “Spatial Analyst” tool of ArcGIS is adopted to generate the indicator values for every 1 km × 1 km decision unit. Finally, synthetic scores are calculated to evaluate the candidate sites of EVCARD stations. The results of the case study verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, which can provide a more scientific and feasible method for carsharing operators to site stations, avoiding aimless and random decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenxiang Li & Ye Li & Jing Fan & Haopeng Deng, 2017. "Siting of Carsharing Stations Based on Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation: A Case Study of Shanghai EVCARD," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:152-:d:88348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/152/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/152/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt0850h6r5 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt0850h6r5 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    4. Anjali Awasthi & Satyaveer S. Chauhan & Xavier Hurteau & Dominique Breuil, 2008. "An Analytical Hierarchical Process-based decision-making approach for selecting car-sharing stations in medium size agglomerations," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 66-97.
    5. Mohd Safian, Edie Ezwan & Nawawi, Abdul Hadi, 2012. "Combining AHP with GIS in the evaluation of locational characteristics quality for purpose-built offices in Malaysia," MPRA Paper 39546, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Ganjar Alfian & Jongtae Rhee & Yong-Shin Kang & Byungun Yoon, 2015. "Performance Comparison of Reservation Based and Instant Access One-Way Car Sharing Service through Discrete Event Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Francesco Ciari & Claude Weis & Milos Balac, 2016. "Evaluating the influence of carsharing stations’ location on potential membership: a Swiss case study," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(3), pages 345-369, August.
    8. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt3bn9n6pq is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & Antunes, António Pais, 2012. "Optimization approach to depot location and trip selection in one-way carsharing systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 233-247.
    10. J. Javid, Roxana & Nejat, Ali & Hayhoe, Katharine, 2014. "Selection of CO2 mitigation strategies for road transportation in the United States using a multi-criteria approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 960-972.
    11. Boyacı, Burak & Zografos, Konstantinos G. & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2015. "An optimization framework for the development of efficient one-way car-sharing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 718-733.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jarosław Wątróbski & Krzysztof Małecki & Kinga Kijewska & Stanisław Iwan & Artur Karczmarczyk & Russell G. Thompson, 2017. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of Electric Vans for City Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-34, August.
    2. Golalikhani, Masoud & Oliveira, Beatriz Brito & de Almeida Correia, Gonçalo Homem & Oliveira, José Fernando & Carravilla, Maria Antónia, 2024. "Optimizing multi-attribute pricing plans with time- and location-dependent rates for different carsharing user profiles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Yalcin, Ahmet Selcuk & Kilic, Huseyin Selcuk & Delen, Dursun, 2022. "The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Katarzyna Turoń & Andrzej Kubik & Feng Chen, 2022. "What Car for Car-Sharing? Conventional, Electric, Hybrid or Hydrogen Fleet? Analysis of the Vehicle Selection Criteria for Car-Sharing Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Feng, Xiaoyan & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun & Liu, Zhiyuan & Lv, Ying, 2020. "Trip chain based usage patterns analysis of the round-trip carsharing system: A case study in Beijing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 190-203.
    6. Katarzyna Turoń, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis during Selection of Vehicles for Car-Sharing Services—Regular Users’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Szabolcs Duleba & Sarbast Moslem, 2018. "Sustainable Urban Transport Development with Stakeholder Participation, an AHP-Kendall Model: A Case Study for Mersin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Carrese, Stefano & D'Andreagiovanni, Fabio & Giacchetti, Tommaso & Nardin, Antonella & Zamberlan, Leonardo, 2021. "An optimization model and genetic-based matheuristic for parking slot rent optimization to carsharing," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Vanduy Tran & Shengchuan Zhao & El Bachir Diop & Weiya Song, 2019. "Travelers’ Acceptance of Electric Carsharing Systems in Developing Countries: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Antonella Petrillo & Pasquale Carotenuto & Ilaria Baffo & Fabio De Felice, 2018. "A web-based multiple criteria decision support system for evaluation analysis of carpooling," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 2321-2341, October.
    11. Li, Wenxiang & Chen, Shawen & Dong, Jieshuang & Wu, Jingxian, 2021. "Exploring the spatial variations of transfer distances between dockless bike-sharing systems and metros," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Zou, Guojian & Lai, Ziliang & Li, Ye & Liu, Xinghua & Li, Wenxiang, 2022. "Exploring the nonlinear impact of air pollution on housing prices: A machine learning approach," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    13. Wenxiang Li & Ye Li & Haopeng Deng & Lei Bao, 2018. "Planning of Electric Public Transport System under Battery Swap Mode," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Tianli & Fields, Evan & Osorio, Carolina, 2023. "A data-driven discrete simulation-based optimization algorithm for car-sharing service design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Mengwei Chen & Yilin Sun & E Owen D Waygood & Jincheng Yu & Kai Zhu, 2022. "User characteristics and service satisfaction of car sharing systems: Evidence from Hangzhou, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Nair, Rahul & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2014. "Equilibrium network design of shared-vehicle systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 47-61.
    4. Wu, Peng, 2019. "Which battery-charging technology and insurance contract is preferred in the electric vehicle sharing business?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 537-548.
    5. Illgen, Stefan & Höck, Michael, 2019. "Literature review of the vehicle relocation problem in one-way car sharing networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 193-204.
    6. Nourinejad, Mehdi & Zhu, Sirui & Bahrami, Sina & Roorda, Matthew J., 2015. "Vehicle relocation and staff rebalancing in one-way carsharing systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 98-113.
    7. Junhee Kang & Keeyeon Hwang & Sungjin Park, 2016. "Finding Factors that Influence Carsharing Usage: Case Study in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Joy Chang & Miao Yu & Siqian Shen & Ming Xu, 2017. "Location Design and Relocation of a Mixed Car-Sharing Fleet with a CO 2 Emission Constraint," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 205-218, September.
    9. Zhang, Si & Sun, Huijun & Liu, Yang & Lv, Ying & Wu, Jianjun & Feng, Xiaoyan, 2024. "Carsharing equitable relocation problem: A two-stage stochastic programming approach with learning-embedded endogenous uncertainty in demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Miao, Hongzhi & Jia, Hongfei & Li, Jiangchen & Qiu, Tony Z., 2019. "Autonomous connected electric vehicle (ACEV)-based car-sharing system modeling and optimal planning: A unified two-stage multi-objective optimization methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 797-818.
    11. Long He & Ho-Yin Mak & Ying Rong & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2017. "Service Region Design for Urban Electric Vehicle Sharing Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 309-327, May.
    12. Yang, Jie & Hu, Lu & Jiang, Yangsheng, 2022. "An overnight relocation problem for one-way carsharing systems considering employment planning, return restrictions, and ride sharing of temporary workers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Çalık, Hatice & Fortz, Bernard, 2019. "A Benders decomposition method for locating stations in a one-way electric car sharing system under demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 121-150.
    14. Xu, Min & Wu, Ting, 2025. "Real-time vehicle relocation and charging optimization for one-way electric carsharing systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    15. Yixi Xue & Yi Zhang & Yi Chen, 2019. "An Evaluation Framework for the Planning of Electric Car-Sharing Systems: A Combination Model of AHP-CBA-VD," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Frank, Laura & Dirks, Nicolas & Walther, Grit, 2021. "Improving rural accessibility by locating multimodal mobility hubs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Zihao Jiao & Lun Ran & Xin Liu & Yuli Zhang & Robin G. Qiu, 2020. "Integrating Price-Incentive and Trip-Selection Policies to Rebalance Shared Electric Vehicles," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 148-173, December.
    18. Hua, Yikang & Zhao, Dongfang & Wang, Xin & Li, Xiaopeng, 2019. "Joint infrastructure planning and fleet management for one-way electric car sharing under time-varying uncertain demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 185-206.
    19. Golalikhani, Masoud & Oliveira, Beatriz Brito & Carravilla, Maria Antónia & Oliveira, José Fernando & Antunes, António Pais, 2021. "Carsharing: A review of academic literature and business practices toward an integrated decision-support framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    20. Huang, Kai & An, Kun & Rich, Jeppe & Ma, Wanjing, 2020. "Vehicle relocation in one-way station-based electric carsharing systems: A comparative study of operator-based and user-based methods," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:152-:d:88348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.