IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i12p4344-d838520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Car for Car-Sharing? Conventional, Electric, Hybrid or Hydrogen Fleet? Analysis of the Vehicle Selection Criteria for Car-Sharing Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Turoń

    (Department of Road Transport, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 8 Krasińskiego Street, 40-019 Katowice, Poland)

  • Andrzej Kubik

    (Department of Road Transport, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 8 Krasińskiego Street, 40-019 Katowice, Poland)

  • Feng Chen

    (Sino-US Global Logistics Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Abstract

Short-term car rental services called “car-sharing” or “carsharing” are systems that in recent years have been an alternative form of transport by individual car in an increasing number of cities around the world. With the growing popularity of services, new decision-making problems have arisen among system operators. Among the challenges faced by operators, due to the constantly growing environmental requirements, is the fleet of vehicles for car-sharing systems-appropriate selection. Noticing this research gap, this article was dedicated to determining the criteria that are important when choosing a fleet of vehicles for car-sharing and to indicate the best suited to the needs of car-sharing vehicles. Own research was proposed, considering desk research, expert research and analyses using the multi-criteria decision support method (ELECTRE III). This research was carried out for the Polish market of car-sharing services. Studying the Polish market is appropriate due to the occurrence of significant difficulties with the fleet incorrectly adjusted to the needs of urban conditions. This study covers vehicles with conventional, electric, hybrid and hydrogen propulsion. The analyses allowed for the determination of the vehicles best suited to the needs of car-sharing. The results show the dominance of hydrogen-powered vehicles over conventional, hybrid and electric vehicles. What is more, it was determined that the most important criteria are the purchase price of the vehicle and energy/fuel consumption per 100 km. The obtained results are a guide to proceeding when making decisions regarding the implementation or modernization of the fleet in car-sharing systems. The results also support achieving more sustainable urban mobility in the zero-emission trend through hydrogen mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Turoń & Andrzej Kubik & Feng Chen, 2022. "What Car for Car-Sharing? Conventional, Electric, Hybrid or Hydrogen Fleet? Analysis of the Vehicle Selection Criteria for Car-Sharing Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4344-:d:838520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4344/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4344/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meng, Zhiyi & Li, Eldon Y. & Qiu, Rui, 2020. "Environmental sustainability with free-floating carsharing services: An on-demand refueling recommendation system for Car2go in Seattle," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Iztok Podbregar, 2021. "Impact of Car Sharing on Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    4. Tomasz Matyja & Andrzej Kubik & Zbigniew Stanik, 2022. "Possibility to Use Professional Bicycle Computers for the Scientific Evaluation of Electric Bikes: Velocity, Cadence and Power Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Wenxiang Li & Ye Li & Jing Fan & Haopeng Deng, 2017. "Siting of Carsharing Stations Based on Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation: A Case Study of Shanghai EVCARD," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Huang, Wei & Huang, Wentao & Jian, Sisi, 2022. "One-way carsharing service design under demand uncertainty: A service reliability-based two-stage stochastic program approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. James S. Dyer & Peter C. Fishburn & Ralph E. Steuer & Jyrki Wallenius & Stanley Zionts, 1992. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: The Next Ten Years," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 645-654, May.
    8. Hu, Lu & Liu, Yang, 2016. "Joint design of parking capacities and fleet size for one-way station-based carsharing systems with road congestion constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 268-299.
    9. Tomasz Matyja & Andrzej Kubik & Zbigniew Stanik, 2022. "Possibility to Use Professional Bicycle Computers for the Scientific Evaluation of Electric Bikes: Trajectory, Distance, and Slope Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Aguilera-García, Álvaro & Gomez, Juan & Antoniou, Constantinos & Vassallo, José Manuel, 2022. "Behavioral factors impacting adoption and frequency of use of carsharing: A tale of two European cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 55-72.
    11. Paweł Ziemba, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Stochastic Selection of Electric Vehicles for the Sustainable Development of Local Government and State Administration Units in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Katarzyna Turoń & Andrzej Kubik & Feng Chen, 2019. "Operational Aspects of Electric Vehicles from Car-Sharing Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Drobiazgiewicz & Agnieszka Pokorska, 2023. "Directions of Carsharing Development in Poland—Analysis of the Need to Expand the Carsharing Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Katarzyna Turoń, 2022. "Carsharing Vehicle Fleet Selection from the Frequent User’s Point of View," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Andrzej Kubik & Katarzyna Turoń & Piotr Folęga & Feng Chen, 2023. "CO 2 Emissions—Evidence from Internal Combustion and Electric Engine Vehicles from Car-Sharing Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Salah Beni Hamed & Mouna Ben Hamed & Lassaad Sbita, 2022. "Robust Voltage Control of a Buck DC-DC Converter: A Sliding Mode Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Katarzyna Turoń, 2022. "Selection of Car Models with a Classic and Alternative Drive to the Car-Sharing Services from the System’s Rare Users Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Andrzej Kubik, 2022. "Selection of an Electric Scooter for Shared Mobility Services Using Multicriteria Decision Support Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-12, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Turoń, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis during Selection of Vehicles for Car-Sharing Services—Regular Users’ Expectations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Katarzyna Turoń, 2022. "Selection of Car Models with a Classic and Alternative Drive to the Car-Sharing Services from the System’s Rare Users Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Andrzej Kubik, 2022. "The Energy Consumption of Electric Scooters Used in the Polish Shared Mobility Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Katarzyna Turoń, 2022. "Carsharing Vehicle Fleet Selection from the Frequent User’s Point of View," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Regina Negri Pagani & João Luiz Kovaleski & Luis Mauricio Resende, 2015. "Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2109-2135, December.
    6. Katarzyna Turoń, 2022. "The Expectations towards Cars to Be Used in Car-Sharing Services—The Perspective of the Current Polish Non-Users," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Piotr Kędziorek & Zbigniew Kasprzyk & Mariusz Rychlicki & Adam Rosiński, 2023. "Analysis and Evaluation of Methods Used in Measuring the Intensity of Bicycle Traffic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Abo-Hamad, Waleed & Arisha, Amr, 2013. "Simulation-based framework to improve patient experience in an emergency department," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 154-166.
    9. Joanna Drobiazgiewicz & Agnieszka Pokorska, 2023. "Directions of Carsharing Development in Poland—Analysis of the Need to Expand the Carsharing Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Flavio Martins & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili & Agatha Oliveira, 2020. "Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    11. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    12. V. Srinivasan & G. Shainesh & Anand K. Sharma, 2015. "An approach to prioritize customer-based, cost-effective service enhancements," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(14), pages 747-762, October.
    13. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2019. "An Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process—Slack Based Measure-Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Logistics Service Providers Considering Undesirable Performance Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Xinxin Liu & Xiaosheng Wang & Haiying Guo & Xiaojie An, 2021. "Benefit Allocation in Shared Water-Saving Management Contract Projects Based on Modified Expected Shapley Value," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 39-62, January.
    15. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    16. Moumita Palchaudhuri & Sujata Biswas, 2016. "Application of AHP with GIS in drought risk assessment for Puruliya district, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 1905-1920, December.
    17. D. K. Choudhury, 2019. "Standard Critical Path and Selection of Most Economic and Quality Contractors for Construction of Thermal Power Plant: A Case Study in NTPC," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 18(2), pages 103-118, December.
    18. Manel Baucells & Rakesh K. Sarin, 2003. "Group Decisions with Multiple Criteria," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(8), pages 1105-1118, August.
    19. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    20. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4344-:d:838520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.