IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p5671-d1105827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Incorporate Autonomous Vehicles into the Carbon Neutrality Framework of China: Legal and Policy Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Xin-Wei Li

    (School of Law, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Hong-Zhi Miao

    (College of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

Abstract

To achieve the announced 2060 carbon neutrality goal, the government of China has recently established its “1 + N” legal and policy framework. However, the emerging autonomous vehicle technology, which is developing rapidly, is not included. Considering the significant potential of autonomous vehicle technology in reducing carbon emissions from the transportation sector, whether and how to integrate it into the current framework can be crucial for China. The existing literature typically does not regard the emission reduction impacts of autonomous vehicles as a major issue, and there are still few studies available aiming to ensure enhancement of emission reduction induced by autonomous vehicle technology from a legal and policy perspective. This article attempts to fill the above research gaps with a three-step research scheme. Specifically, this work begins with a comprehensive and detailed analysis of the possible wide range of factors affecting energy consumption and emissions of autonomous vehicles. Next, an in-depth discussion of the feasibility of incorporating autonomous vehicle technology into the current “1 + N” legal and policy framework is provided. Finally, several recommendations corresponding to these factors are proposed from legal and policy perspectives: (i) adoption of industrial incentives to mitigate research and development costs and risks at the production level and to expand market demand at the consumption level; (ii) priority promotion of the commercialization of autonomous vehicles in the taxi market by filling legal gaps and applying regulatory measures; (iii) development of efficient transportation policies and land use policies. This article provides a systematic and practical scheme for inclusion of autonomous vehicles in China’s legal and policy framework to realize the carbon neutrality goal. The proposed recommendations can be referenced for other governments that may face similar challenges and future development of possible uniform rules at the global level.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin-Wei Li & Hong-Zhi Miao, 2023. "How to Incorporate Autonomous Vehicles into the Carbon Neutrality Framework of China: Legal and Policy Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5671-:d:1105827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5671/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5671/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt0850h6r5 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt0850h6r5 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Jeffery B. Greenblatt & Samveg Saxena, 2015. "Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(9), pages 860-863, September.
    4. Bansal, Prateek & Kockelman, Kara M., 2017. "Forecasting Americans’ long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 49-63.
    5. Chen Wang & Yulu Dai & Jingxin Xia, 2020. "A CAV Platoon Control Method for Isolated Intersections: Guaranteed Feasible Multi-Objective Approach with Priority," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    6. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt0dk3h89p is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Neves, Andre & Brand, Christian, 2019. "Assessing the potential for carbon emissions savings from replacing short car trips with walking and cycling using a mixed GPS-travel diary approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 130-146.
    8. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt3bn9n6pq is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Long He & Ho-Yin Mak & Ying Rong & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2017. "Service Region Design for Urban Electric Vehicle Sharing Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 309-327, May.
    10. Konstantina Anastasiadou, 2021. "Sustainable Mobility Driven Prioritization of New Vehicle Technologies, Based on a New Decision-Aiding Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Oke, Jimi B. & Akkinepally, Arun Prakash & Chen, Siyu & Xie, Yifei & Aboutaleb, Youssef M. & Azevedo, Carlos Lima & Zegras, P. Christopher & Ferreira, Joseph & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2020. "Evaluating the systemic effects of automated mobility-on-demand services via large-scale agent-based simulation of auto-dependent prototype cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 98-126.
    12. Peng Jing & Gang Xu & Yuexia Chen & Yuji Shi & Fengping Zhan, 2020. "The Determinants behind the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, February.
    13. Chen, Zhibin & He, Fang & Yin, Yafeng & Du, Yuchuan, 2017. "Optimal design of autonomous vehicle zones in transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 44-61.
    14. Lee, Yongsung & Lee, Bumsoo, 2022. "What’s eating public transit in the United States? Reasons for declining transit ridership in the 2010s," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 126-143.
    15. Mariano Gallo & Mario Marinelli, 2020. "Sustainable Mobility: A Review of Possible Actions and Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    16. Choi, Wonjae & Song, Han Ho, 2018. "Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles in countries dependent on the import of fuels through maritime transportation: A South Korean case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 135-147.
    17. Nourinejad, Mehdi & Bahrami, Sina & Roorda, Matthew J., 2018. "Designing parking facilities for autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 110-127.
    18. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt6xt6d5jv is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Ma, Fangwu & Yang, Yu & Wang, Jiawei & Liu, Zhenze & Li, Jinhang & Nie, Jiahong & Shen, Yucheng & Wu, Liang, 2019. "Predictive energy-saving optimization based on nonlinear model predictive control for cooperative connected vehicles platoon with V2V communication," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Zakharenko, Roman, 2016. "Self-driving cars will change cities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 26-37.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iulia Ioana Mircea & Eugen Rosca & Ciprian Sorin Vlad & Larisa Ivascu, 2025. "Environmental and Behavioral Dimensions of Private Autonomous Vehicles in Sustainable Urban Mobility," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kassens-Noor, Eva & Dake, Dana & Decaminada, Travis & Kotval-K, Zeenat & Qu, Teresa & Wilson, Mark & Pentland, Brian, 2020. "Sociomobility of the 21st century: Autonomous vehicles, planning, and the future city," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 329-335.
    2. Anna Eliza Wolnowska & Lech Kasyk, 2022. "Transport Preferences of City Residents in the Context of Urban Mobility and Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-32, August.
    3. Xiaojuan Yu & Vincent van den Berg & Erik Verhoef, 2019. "Autonomous cars and dynamic bottleneck congestion revisited: how in-vehicle activities determine aggregate travel patterns," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-067/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Tian, Li-Jun & Tang, Zhe-Yi & Liu, Peng & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2024. "Parking policy design for managing morning commute with dedicated autonomous vehicle lane," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Darja Topolšek & Dario Babić & Darko Babić & Tina Cvahte Ojsteršek, 2020. "Factors Influencing the Purchase Intention of Autonomous Cars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Morteza Taiebat & Austin L. Brown & Hannah R. Safford & Shen Qu & Ming Xu, 2019. "A Review on Energy, Environmental, and Sustainability Implications of Connected and Automated Vehicles," Papers 1901.10581, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2019.
    7. Guo, Yuntao & Souders, Dustin & Labi, Samuel & Peeta, Srinivas & Benedyk, Irina & Li, Yujie, 2021. "Paving the way for autonomous Vehicles: Understanding autonomous vehicle adoption and vehicle fuel choice under user heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 364-398.
    8. Iva Bojic & Dániel Kondor & Wei Tu & Ke Mai & Paolo Santi & Carlo Ratti, 2021. "Identifying the Potential for Partial Integration of Private and Public Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Tang, Zhe-Yi & Tian, Li-Jun & Wang, David Z.W., 2021. "Multi-modal morning commute with endogenous shared autonomous vehicle penetration considering parking space constraint," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    10. Millard-Ball, Adam, 2019. "The autonomous vehicle parking problem," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 99-108.
    11. Talebian, Ahmadreza & Mishra, Sabyasachee, 2022. "Unfolding the state of the adoption of connected autonomous trucks by the commercial fleet owner industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Peng Jing & Gang Xu & Yuexia Chen & Yuji Shi & Fengping Zhan, 2020. "The Determinants behind the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, February.
    13. Sajjad Shafiei & Ziyuan Gu & Hanna Grzybowska & Chen Cai, 2023. "Impact of self-parking autonomous vehicles on urban traffic congestion," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 183-203, February.
    14. Liu, Qingquan & Guo, Yaming & An, Yunlong & Li, Meng, 2025. "Joint lane management and signal optimization for mixed-autonomy intersections: An analytical approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 668(C).
    15. Jacek Oskarbski & Krystian Birr & Karol Żarski, 2021. "Bicycle Traffic Model for Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-36, September.
    16. Chen, Shuiwang & Hu, Lu & Yao, Zhihong & Zhu, Juanxiu & Zhao, Bin & Jiang, Yangsheng, 2022. "Efficient and environmentally friendly operation of intermittent dedicated lanes for connected autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic environments," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 608(P2).
    17. You Kong & Jihong Ou & Longfei Chen & Fengchun Yang & Bo Yu, 2023. "The Environmental Impacts of Automated Vehicles on Parking: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Xing, Yingying & Li, Lun & Sheng, Xiaolu & Zhou, Huiyu & Han, Xiao, 2025. "Understanding public perceptions of autonomous vehicles: A structural model to urban-rural differences and psychological factors," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 70-84.
    19. Hussain, Qinaat & Alhajyaseen, Wael K.M. & Adnan, Muhammad & Almallah, Mustafa & Almukdad, Abdulkarim & Alqaradawi, Mohammed, 2021. "Autonomous vehicles between anticipation and apprehension: Investigations through safety and security perceptions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 440-451.
    20. Xing, Yingying & Zhou, Huiyu & Han, Xiao & Zhang, Meng & Lu, Jian, 2022. "What influences vulnerable road users’ perceptions of autonomous vehicles? A comparative analysis of the 2017 and 2019 Pittsburgh surveys," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5671-:d:1105827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.