IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v7y2025i3p56-d1696574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental and Behavioral Dimensions of Private Autonomous Vehicles in Sustainable Urban Mobility

Author

Listed:
  • Iulia Ioana Mircea

    (Faculty of Transportation, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Eugen Rosca

    (Faculty of Transportation, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ciprian Sorin Vlad

    (Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 14 Remus Street, 300006 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Larisa Ivascu

    (Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 14 Remus Street, 300006 Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

In the current context, where environmental concerns are gaining increased attention, the transition toward sustainable urban mobility stands out as a necessary and responsible step. Technological advancements over the past decade have brought private autonomous vehicles, particularly those defined by the Society of Automotive Engineers Levels 4 and 5, into focus as promising solutions for mitigating road congestion and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, the extent to which Autonomous Vehicles can fulfill this potential depends largely on user acceptance, patterns of use, and their integration within broader green energy and sustainability policies. The present paper aims to develop an integrated conceptual model that links behavioral determinants to environmental outcomes, assessing how individuals’ intention to adopt private autonomous vehicles can contribute to sustainable urban mobility. The model integrates five psychosocial determinants—perceived usefulness, trust in technology, social influence, environmental concern, and perceived behavioral control—with contextual variables such as energy source, infrastructure availability, and public policy. These components interact to predict users’ intention to adopt AVs and their perceived contribution to urban sustainability. Methodologically, the study builds on a narrative synthesis of the literature and proposes a framework applicable to empirical validation through structural equation modeling (SEM). The model draws on established frameworks such as Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theory of Planned Behavior, and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, incorporating constructs including perceived usefulness, trust in technology, social influence, environmental concern, and perceived behavioral control, constructs later to be examined in relation to key contextual variables, including the energy source powering Autonomous Vehicles—such as electricity from mixed or renewable grids, hydrogen, or hybrid systems—and the broader policy environment (regulatory frameworks, infrastructure investment, fiscal incentives, and alignment with climate and mobility strategies and others). The research provides relevant directions for public policy and behavioral interventions in support of the development of clean and smart urban transport in the age of automation.

Suggested Citation

  • Iulia Ioana Mircea & Eugen Rosca & Ciprian Sorin Vlad & Larisa Ivascu, 2025. "Environmental and Behavioral Dimensions of Private Autonomous Vehicles in Sustainable Urban Mobility," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:56-:d:1696574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/7/3/56/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/7/3/56/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md. Mokhlesur Rahman & Jean-Claude Thill, 2023. "What Drives People’s Willingness to Adopt Autonomous Vehicles? A Review of Internal and External Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Md Arifuzzaman & Shohel Amin, 2025. "Automated Vehicles: Are Cities Ready to Adopt AVs as the Sustainable Transport Solution?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Xin-Wei Li & Hong-Zhi Miao, 2023. "How to Incorporate Autonomous Vehicles into the Carbon Neutrality Framework of China: Legal and Policy Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Guo, Lirui & Burke, Michael G. & Griggs, Wynita M., 2025. "A new framework to predict and visualize technology acceptance: A case study of shared autonomous vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    5. Richter, Maximilian A. & Hagenmaier, Markus & Bandte, Oliver & Parida, Vinit & Wincent, Joakim, 2022. "Smart cities, urban mobility and autonomous vehicles: How different cities needs different sustainable investment strategies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    6. Dorina Pojani & Dominic Stead, 2015. "Sustainable Urban Transport in the Developing World: Beyond Megacities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Thurner, Thomas & Fursov, Konstantin & Nefedova, Alena, 2022. "Early adopters of new transportation technologies: Attitudes of Russia’s population towards car sharing, the electric car and autonomous driving," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 403-417.
    8. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    9. Schepis, Daniel & Purchase, Sharon & Olaru, Doina & Smith, Brett & Ellis, Nick, 2023. "How governments influence autonomous vehicle (AV) innovation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. Nastjuk, Ilja & Herrenkind, Bernd & Marrone, Mauricio & Brendel, Alfred Benedikt & Kolbe, Lutz M., 2020. "What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? An investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user's perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Liangyong Xue & Abdullah Mat Rashid & Sha Ouyang, 2024. "The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, February.
    12. Dharm Dev Bhatta & Muddassar Sarfraz & Larisa Ivascu & Marius Pislaru, 2023. "The Nexus of Corporate Affinity for Technology and Firm Sustainable Performance in the Era of Digitalization: A Mediated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Nattakorn Pinyanitikorn & Walailak Atthirawong & Wirachchaya Chanpuypetch, 2024. "Examining the Intention to Adopt an Online Platform for Freight Forwarding Services in Thailand: A Modified Unified Theory for Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-23, July.
    14. Jung-Chieh Lee & Ting Li & Lihui Zhang, 2025. "Environmental concerns and green trust in continuous green fintech use: an expectation-confirmation model with insights from Ant Forest," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Marius Pislaru & Ciprian Sorin Vlad & Larisa Ivascu & Iulia Ioana Mircea, 2024. "Citizen-Centric Governance: Enhancing Citizen Engagement through Artificial Intelligence Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Brand, C. & Marsden, G. & Anable, J.L. & Dixon, J. & Barrett, J., 2025. "Achieving deep transport energy demand reductions in the United Kingdom," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    17. Fábio Duarte & Carlo Ratti, 2018. "The Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Cities: A Review," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 3-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asmussen, Katherine E. & Mondal, Aupal & Bhat, Chandra R., 2022. "Adoption of partially automated vehicle technology features and impacts on vehicle miles of travel (VMT)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 156-179.
    2. Jing, Peng & Wang, Baihui & Cai, Yunhao & Wang, Bichen & Huang, Jiahui & Yang, Chenglu & Jiang, Chengxi, 2023. "What is the public really concerned about the AV crash? Insights from a combined analysis of social media and questionnaire survey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Pettigrew, Simone & Booth, Leon & Farrar, Victoria & Brown, Julie & Karl, Charles & Godic, Branislava & Vidanaarachchi, Rajith & Thompson, Jason, 2024. "Public support for proposed government policies to optimise the social benefits of autonomous vehicles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 264-270.
    4. Gartner, Johannes & Fink, Matthias & Maresch, Daniela, 2022. "The Role of Fear of Missing Out and Experience in the Formation of SME Decision Makers’ Intentions to Adopt New Manufacturing Technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    5. Quy Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy & An Ngoc Nguyen, Nguyen & Nguyen, Minh Hieu & Ngoc Thi Nguyen, Ly & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2022. "Factors influencing road safety compliance among food delivery riders: An extension of the job demands-resources (JD-R) model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 541-556.
    6. Nan, Dongyan & Lee, Haein & Kim, Yerin & Kim, Jang Hyun, 2022. "My video game console is so cool! A coolness theory-based model for intention to use video game consoles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Kaiyue Li & Dongning Li, 2025. "How Autonomous Vehicles Shape Urban Traffic Sustainability: An Empirical Study Based on Structural Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Mohamed Alawadhi & Jumah Almazrouie & Mohammed Kamil & Khalil Abdelrazek Khalil, 2020. "A systematic literature review of the factors influencing the adoption of autonomous driving," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1065-1082, December.
    9. Yuwei Liu & Hong Sheng & Norbert Mundorf & Colleen Redding & Yinjiao Ye, 2017. "Integrating Norm Activation Model and Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Sustainable Transport Behavior: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Bireswar Dutta, 2025. "Evaluation of Political and Economic Factors Affecting Energy Policies: Addressing Contemporary Challenges from Taiwan’s Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Zhu, Ge & Chen, Yuche & Zheng, Jiali, 2024. "Partially autonomous vehicles (PAVs) vs. fully autonomous vehicles (FAVs): A comparative study with adoption models," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. Samadzad, Mahdi & Nosratzadeh, Hossein & Karami, Hossein & Karami, Ali, 2023. "What are the factors affecting the adoption and use of electric scooter sharing systems from the end user's perspective?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 70-82.
    13. Su, Yu-Shan & Huang, Hsini & Daim, Tugrul & Chien, Pan-Wei & Peng, Ru-Ling & Karaman Akgul, Arzu, 2023. "Assessing the technological trajectory of 5G-V2X autonomous driving inventions: Use of patent analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    14. Xiao, Jingyi & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2022. "Perceived usefulness and intentions to adopt autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 170-185.
    15. Irgang, Luís & Sestino, Andrea & Barth, Henrik & Holmén, Magnus, 2025. "Healthcare workers' adoption of and satisfaction with artificial intelligence: The counterintuitive role of paradoxical tensions and paradoxical mindset," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    16. Alessandro La Delfa & Zheng Han, 2025. "Sustainable Mobility and Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Literature Review of Travel Behavior Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-39, March.
    17. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    19. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    20. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:56-:d:1696574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.