IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i5p1286-d1606328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Political and Economic Factors Affecting Energy Policies: Addressing Contemporary Challenges from Taiwan’s Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Bireswar Dutta

    (English Taught Program in Smart Service Management, Department of Information Technology and Management, Shih Chien University, Taipei 104, Taiwan)

Abstract

The shift to sustainable energy requires a thorough understanding of the elements affecting policy adoption, especially regarding political and economic dynamics. Current approaches, such as the technology acceptance model (TAM), theory of planned behavior (TPB), and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), mainly emphasize individual behavioral aspects, often neglecting macro-level implications. This research uses the hybrid model for energy policy adoption (HMEPA) to bridge this gap, including economic and political factors with behavioral theories to evaluate energy policy acceptability. We propose that social impact, attitudes toward the policy, and financial and political considerations substantially affect stakeholders’ acceptance intentions. We gathered 421 valid answers from people in Taiwan using a questionnaire survey and analyzed the data using structural equation modeling (SEM). The findings demonstrate that whereas effort expectation and enabling circumstances have little impact, social influence and attitude are the most significant determinants of policy adoption intention. Moreover, political variables influence attitudes and social dynamics, while economic policy impacts performance expectations, perceived behavioral control, and enabling circumstances. These results underscore the need to synchronize policy plans with political and economic realities. Policymakers may use these findings to formulate stakeholder-oriented policies that promote sustainable energy transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bireswar Dutta, 2025. "Evaluation of Political and Economic Factors Affecting Energy Policies: Addressing Contemporary Challenges from Taiwan’s Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1286-:d:1606328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Liangyong Xue & Abdullah Mat Rashid & Sha Ouyang, 2024. "The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, February.
    3. Chibuike Kingsley Nduneseokwu & Ying Qu & Andrea Appolloni, 2017. "Factors Influencing Consumers’ Intentions to Participate in a Formal E-Waste Collection System: A Case Study of Onitsha, Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Imran Hossain & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Md. Nekmahmud, 2022. "Purchase Behavior of Energy-Efficient Appliances Contribute to Sustainable Energy Consumption in Developing Country: Moral Norms Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Pushkar Dubey & Kailash Kumar Sahu, 2022. "Examining the effects of demographic, social and environmental factors on entrepreneurial intention," Management Matters, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 91-108, May.
    6. Gimpel, Henner & Graf, Vanessa & Graf-Drasch, Valerie, 2020. "A comprehensive model for individuals’ acceptance of smart energy technology – A meta-analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Hashemizadeh, Ali & Ju, Yanbing & Abadi, Faezeh Zareian Baghdad, 2024. "Policy design for renewable energy development based on government support: A system dynamics model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PB).
    8. Tanvi Bhatia & Gnana Bharathy & Mukesh Prasad, 2024. "A Targeted Review on Revisiting and Augmenting the Framework for Technology Acceptance in the Renewable Energy Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-27, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nkosinathi Henry Mothibi & Mmakgabo Justice Malebana & Edward Malatse Rankhumise, 2025. "Determinants of Entrepreneurial Behaviour Among Vocational College and University Students in Gauteng, South Africa: A Theory of Planned Behaviour Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Hong Thi Thu Nguyen & Rern-Jay Hung & Chun-Hung Lee & Hang Thi Thu Nguyen, 2018. "Determinants of Residents’ E-Waste Recycling Behavioral Intention: A Case Study from Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Kareem Abdul Waheed & Abhilasha Singh & Ayisha Siddiqua & Maisa El Gamal & Mohammed Laeequddin, 2023. "E-Waste Recycling Behavior in the United Arab Emirates: Investigating the Roles of Environmental Consciousness, Cost, and Infrastructure Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Marimuthu, Malliga & D'Souza, Clare & Shukla, Yupal, 2022. "Integrating community value into the adoption framework: A systematic review of conceptual research on participatory smart city applications," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Adina-Iuliana Jigani & Camelia Delcea & Corina Ioanăș, 2020. "Consumers’ Behavior in Selective Waste Collection: A Case Study Regarding the Determinants from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-35, August.
    6. Bircan Arslannur & Ahmet Tortum, 2023. "Public Transport Modeling for Commuting in Cities with Different Development Levels Using Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Ilknur Ayar & Ahmet Gürbüz, 2021. "Sustainable Consumption Intentions of Consumers in Turkey: A Research Within the Theory of Planned Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    8. Qin, Yong & Xu, Zeshui & Wang, Xinxin & Škare, Marinko, 2022. "Green energy adoption and its determinants: A bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    9. Ronald Baganzi & Geon-Cheol Shin & Shali Wu, 2019. "Examining Consumers’ Attitudes toward Gmarket Online Shopping," J, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Tetiana Shevchenko & Kirsi Laitala & Yuriy Danko, 2019. "Understanding Consumer E-Waste Recycling Behavior: Introducing a New Economic Incentive to Increase the Collection Rates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Luiz Philipi Calegari & Guilherme Luz Tortorella & Diego Castro Fettermann, 2023. "Getting Connected to M-Health Technologies through a Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-33, February.
    12. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    14. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    15. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    16. Ruijie Zhu & Guojing Zhao & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang & Zhaoxin Huang, 2022. "Entrepreneurship or Employment? A Survey of College Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    18. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    19. Mohammed Akhmaaj, Asmaeil Ali & Sharif, Mohamed Omar, 2024. "The effects of planned behavior model constructs and technology acceptance model constructs on online purchasing behavior: An empirical study on internet users in the Libya city of Tripoli," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Benoît Lécureux & Adrien Bonnet & Ouassim Manout & Jaâfar Berrada & Louafi Bouzouina, 2022. "Acceptance of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Literature Review of stated choice experiments," Working Papers hal-03814947, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1286-:d:1606328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.