IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11931-d1209545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Transport Modeling for Commuting in Cities with Different Development Levels Using Extended Theory of Planned Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Bircan Arslannur

    (Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Igdir University, Igdir 76000, Turkey)

  • Ahmet Tortum

    (Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25030, Turkey)

Abstract

Reducing the use of private vehicles and promoting public transportation (PT) have always been the primary policy objectives of transport authorities. This study aims to model the factors affecting intentions and behaviors of employees to use PT for their commutes by creating an extended theory of planned behavior (ETPB). The ETPB model’s applicability was evaluated using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) technique on a total of 2048 employees in three distinct cities. Then, the Multigroup analysis (MGA) method was used to compare various cities, and demographic variables such as age, education, gender, household income, and walking time to nearest PT stop. The analysis revealed that attitude, perceived norm, and personal agency have a statistically positive influence on employees’ intention to use PT. Moreover, behavioral capability, intention, and habit have a positive effect on PT use, whereas environmental constraints have a negative effect. The results of the MGA analysis revealed significant differences between regions, particularly in terms of environmental factors, intention, and habit. Similarly, the article describes disparities that have emerged according to other demographic variables. The findings imply that interventions by decision makers have the potential to alter the mode of transportation chosen for commuting.

Suggested Citation

  • Bircan Arslannur & Ahmet Tortum, 2023. "Public Transport Modeling for Commuting in Cities with Different Development Levels Using Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11931-:d:1209545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11931/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11931/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamid Rastegari Kopaei & Mehdi Nooripoor & Ayatollah Karami & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag & Dacinia Crina Petrescu, 2021. "Drivers of Residents’ Home Composting Intention: Integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior, the Norm Activation Model, and the Moderating Role of Composting Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Farzad Jalilian & Mehdi Mirzaei-Alavijeh & Mohammad Ahmadpanah & Shayan Mostafaei & Mehdi Kargar & Razieh Pirouzeh & Dena Sadeghi Bahmani & Serge Brand, 2020. "Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to Predict Patterns of Marijuana Use among Young Iranian Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Longinos Marin & Salvador Ruiz & Alicia Rubio, 2009. "The Role of Identity Salience in the Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 65-78, January.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi Ibrahim & Muhamad Nazri Borhan & Riza Atiq O.K. Rahmat, 2020. "Understanding Users’ Intention to Use Park-and-Ride Facilities in Malaysia: The Role of Trust as a Novel Construct in the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Chibuike Kingsley Nduneseokwu & Ying Qu & Andrea Appolloni, 2017. "Factors Influencing Consumers’ Intentions to Participate in a Formal E-Waste Collection System: A Case Study of Onitsha, Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Peng Jing & Hao Huang & Bin Ran & Fengping Zhan & Yuji Shi, 2019. "Exploring the Factors Affecting Mode Choice Intention of Autonomous Vehicle Based on an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior—A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Jensen, Mette, 1999. "Passion and heart in transport -- a sociological analysis on transport behaviour," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 19-33, January.
    9. Xiaojian Hu & Nan Wu & Nuo Chen, 2021. "Young People’s Behavioral Intentions towards Low-Carbon Travel: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Liang, Jyun-Kai & Eccarius, Timo & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2019. "Investigating factors that affect the intention to use shared parking: A case study of Taipei City," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 799-812.
    11. Daniel Albalate & Xavier Fageda, 2019. "Congestion, Road Safety, and the Effectiveness of Public Policies in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Susan Handy & Bert van Wee & Maarten Kroesen, 2014. "Promoting Cycling for Transport: Research Needs and Challenges," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 4-24, January.
    13. Qin-Lei Jing & Han-Zhen Liu & Wei-Qing Yu & Xu He, 2022. "The Impact of Public Transportation on Carbon Emissions—From the Perspective of Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Xiaoxiao Wang & Liangjie Xu, 2021. "Factors Influencing Young Drivers’ Willingness to Engage in Risky Driving Behavior: Continuous Lane-Changing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Mackett, Roger L. & Edwards, Marion, 1998. "The impact of new urban public transport systems: will the expectations be met?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 231-245, May.
    16. Yuwei Liu & Hong Sheng & Norbert Mundorf & Colleen Redding & Yinjiao Ye, 2017. "Integrating Norm Activation Model and Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Sustainable Transport Behavior: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Parkins, John R. & Rollins, Curtis & Anders, Sven & Comeau, Louise, 2018. "Predicting intention to adopt solar technology in Canada: The role of knowledge, public engagement, and visibility," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 114-122.
    18. Jiang, Kang & Ling, Feiyang & Feng, Zhongxiang & Wang, Kun & Shao, Cheng, 2017. "Why do drivers continue driving while fatigued? An application of the theory of planned behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 141-149.
    19. Sebastian Bamberg & Peter Schmidt, 1998. "Changing Travel-Mode Choice As Rational Choice:," Rationality and Society, , vol. 10(2), pages 223-252, May.
    20. Muhammad Mohiuddin & Abdullah Al Mamun & Fazal Ali Syed & Muhammad Mehedi Masud & Zhan Su, 2018. "Environmental Knowledge, Awareness, and Business School Students’ Intentions to Purchase Green Vehicles in Emerging Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    21. Xuemei Fu & Zhicai Juan, 2017. "Understanding public transit use behavior: integration of the theory of planned behavior and the customer satisfaction theory," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1021-1042, September.
    22. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    23. Xinjie Zhang & Hongzhi Guan & Haiyan Zhu & Junze Zhu, 2019. "Analysis of Travel Mode Choice Behavior Considering the Indifference Threshold," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    24. Wu Li & Shengchuan Zhao & Jingwen Ma & Wenwen Qin, 2021. "Investigating Regional and Generational Heterogeneity in Low-Carbon Travel Behavior Intention Based on a PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pronello, Cristina & Camusso, Cristian, 2011. "Travellers’ profiles definition using statistical multivariate analysis of attitudinal variables," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1294-1308.
    2. Liying Wang & Junya Wang & Pengxia Shen & Shangqing Liu & Shuwei Zhang, 2023. "Low-Carbon Travel Behavior in Daily Residence and Tourism Destination: Based on TPB-ABC Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Wei Luo & Silong Wei & Yi Wang & Pengpeng Jiao, 2023. "People’s Intentions to Use Shared Autonomous Vehicles: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Divine Ifransca Wijaya & Phimsupha Kokchang, 2023. "Factors Influencing Generation Z’s Pro-Environmental Behavior towards Indonesia’s Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Anable, Jillian, 2005. "'Complacent Car Addicts' or 'Aspiring Environmentalists'? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 65-78, January.
    6. Naihui Wang & Yulong Pei & Hao Fu, 2022. "Public Acceptance of Last-Mile Shuttle Bus Services with Automation and Electrification in Cold-Climate Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Timmer, Sebastian & Bösehans, Gustav & Henkel, Sven, 2023. "Behavioural norms or personal gains? – An empirical analysis of commuters‘ intention to switch to multimodal mobility behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Laura Omarova & Sung-Jun Jo, 2022. "Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Impact of Environmental Transformational Leadership and GHRM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Niu, Zhipeng & Hu, Xiaowei & Qi, Shouming & Yang, Haihua & Wang, Siqing & An, Shi, 2021. "Determinants to parking mode alternatives: A model integrating technology acceptance model and satisfaction–loyalty model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 216-234.
    10. Hongyun Si & Jian-gang Shi & Daizhong Tang & Shiping Wen & Wei Miao & Kaifeng Duan, 2019. "Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Environmental Science: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, August.
    11. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Baker, Douglas & Washington, Simon & Turrell, Gavin, 2013. "Residential dissonance and mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-28.
    12. Jie Gao & Dick Ettema & Marco Helbich & Carlijn B. M. Kamphuis, 2019. "Travel mode attitudes, urban context, and demographics: do they interact differently for bicycle commuting and cycling for other purposes?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2441-2463, December.
    13. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Analysis of Consumers’ Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: An Expansion of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    14. Lars E. Olsson & Jana Huck & Margareta Friman, 2018. "Intention for Car Use Reduction: Applying a Stage-Based Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    15. An-Jin Shie & You-Yu Dai & Ming-Xing Shen & Li Tian & Ming Yang & Wen-Wei Luo & Yenchun Jim Wu & Zhao-Hui Su, 2022. "Diamond Model of Green Commitment and Low-Carbon Travel Motivation, Constraint, and Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Abdullah Al Mamun & Syed Ali Fazal & Muhammad Mehedi Masud & Ganeshsree Selvachandran & Noor Raihani Zainol & Quek Shio Gai, 2020. "The Underlying Drivers of Underprivileged Households’ Intention and Behavior towards Community Forestry Management: A Study Using Structural Equation Modelling and Artificial Neural Network Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    17. Zaitul Zaitul & Novianti Neva & Ilona Desi, 2022. "Village-Based Tourism Performance: Tourist Satisfaction and Revisit Intention," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 36-43, June.
    18. Yueqi Mao & Qiang Mei & Peng Jing & Ye Zha & Ying Xue & Jiahui Huang & Danning Shao & Pan Luo, 2022. "Factors Affecting the Parental Intention of Using AVs to Escort Children: An Integrated SEM–Hybrid Choice Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    20. Maria Rodrigues & João F. Proença & Rita Macedo, 2023. "Determinants of the Purchase of Secondhand Products: An Approach by the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11931-:d:1209545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.