IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v174y2025ics0967070x25004044.html

A multidimensional analysis of potential suppliers’ behavioral intentions in shared parking: Insights from SEM, NCA, and fsQCA

Author

Listed:
  • Niu, Zhipeng
  • Liu, Wenjia
  • Yao, Jia
  • Xiao, Xu
  • Wu, Jianjun

Abstract

Residential shared parking has garnered growing interest as a strategy to alleviate parking scarcity and enhance space utilization. However, private parking space suppliers hesitate to participate in shared parking programs due to the trade-offs between benefits and risks. Therefore, understanding the motives behind the reluctance of potential suppliers is crucial for incentivizing their participation. This study integrates the technology acceptance model (TAM) and expectation confirmation theory (ECT) to investigate the formation mechanisms of behavioral intentions. A three-step analytical approach is employed, comprising structural equation modeling (SEM), necessary condition analysis (NCA), and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). SEM is used to validate the causal relationships and net effects among variables within TAM and ECT, while NCA is used to identify the key prerequisites of potential supplier participation. Finally, fsQCA examines how different configurational effects shape behavioral intentions. The SEM findings suggest that although potential suppliers accept shared parking technology, high decision-making costs (e.g., time and maintenance) reduce their satisfaction and willingness to participate. Further multigroup analyses reveal heterogeneous decision-making motivations in which owners are more risk-averse, whereas renters prioritize stable returns. Additionally, NCA and fsQCA reveal that owners’ behavioral intentions are driven by confirmation and perceived availability, while renters’ intentions depend on confirmation, expectation, satisfaction, and social influence. Nevertheless, perceived risk and low availability are the principal obstacles for both groups. By integrating TAM and ECT, this study enriches the theoretical understanding of shared parking and provides practical recommendations for enhancing potential supplier participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Niu, Zhipeng & Liu, Wenjia & Yao, Jia & Xiao, Xu & Wu, Jianjun, 2025. "A multidimensional analysis of potential suppliers’ behavioral intentions in shared parking: Insights from SEM, NCA, and fsQCA," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:174:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25004044
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25004044
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdelghaffar, Hossam M. & Batista, S.F.A. & Rehman, Abdur & Cao, Jin & Menéndez, Mónica & Jabari, Saif Eddin, 2024. "Comparison of probabilistic cruising-for-parking time estimation models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Shoup, Donald C., 2006. "Cruising for parking," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 479-486, November.
    3. Chou, Chun-Chen & Iamtrakul, Pawinee & Yoh, Kento & Miyata, Masato & Doi, Kenji, 2024. "Determining the role of self-efficacy in sustained behavior change: An empirical study on intention to use community-based electric ride-sharing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Tho, Nguyen Dinh & Trang, Nguyen Thi Mai, 2015. "Can knowledge be transferred from business schools to business organizations through in-service training students? SEM and fsQCA findings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1332-1340.
    5. Fu, Xue-mei & Zhang, Jiang-hua & Chan, Felix T.S., 2018. "Determinants of loyalty to public transit: A model integrating Satisfaction-Loyalty Theory and Expectation-Confirmation Theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 476-490.
    6. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Su, Diep Ngoc & Tran, Phuong Thi Kim & Le, Diem-Trinh Thi & Johnson, Lester W., 2020. "Factors influencing customer's loyalty towards ride-hailing taxi services – A case study of Vietnam," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 96-112.
    7. Pappas, Ilias O. & Woodside, Arch G., 2021. "Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    8. Liang, Jyun-Kai & Eccarius, Timo & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2019. "Investigating factors that affect the intention to use shared parking: A case study of Taipei City," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 799-812.
    9. Jumaan, Ibrahim A. & Hashim, Noor Hazarina & Al-Ghazali, Basheer M., 2020. "The role of cognitive absorption in predicting mobile internet users’ continuance intention: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Xuemei Fu & Zhicai Juan, 2017. "Understanding public transit use behavior: integration of the theory of planned behavior and the customer satisfaction theory," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1021-1042, September.
    11. Oliver, Richard L. & Balakrishnan, P. V. (Sundar) & Barry, Bruce, 1994. "Outcome Satisfaction in Negotiation: A Test of Expectancy Disconfirmation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 252-275, November.
    12. Wilhelms, Mark-Philipp & Merfeld, Katrin & Henkel, Sven, 2017. "Yours, mine, and ours: A user-centric analysis of opportunities and challenges in peer-to-peer asset sharing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 771-781.
    13. Sukhov, Alexandre & Friman, Margareta & Olsson, Lars E., 2023. "Unlocking potential: An integrated approach using PLS-SEM, NCA, and fsQCA for informed decision making," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Gu, Yu & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot, 2024. "Modeling shared parking services at spatially correlated locations through a weibit-based combined destination and parking choice equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    15. Nicole Franziska Richter & Sven Hauff & Christian M. Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Aleksandar E. Kolev & Sandra Schubring, 2023. "How to Apply Necessary Condition Analysis in PLS-SEM," Springer Books, in: Hengky Latan & Joseph F. Hair, Jr. & Richard Noonan (ed.), Partial Least Squares Path Modeling, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 267-297, Springer.
    16. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    17. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    18. Niu, Zhipeng & Hu, Xiaowei & Fatmi, Mahmudur & Qi, Shouming & Wang, Siqing & Yang, Haihua & An, Shi, 2023. "Parking occupancy prediction under COVID-19 anti-pandemic policies: A model based on a policy-aware temporal convolutional network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Ning, Yu & Yan, Mian & Xu, Su Xiu & Li, Yina & Li, Lixu, 2021. "Shared parking acceptance under perceived network externality and risks: Theory and evidence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1-15.
    20. Wang, Yacan & Douglas, Matthew & Hazen, Benjamin, 2021. "Diffusion of public bicycle systems: Investigating influences of users’ perceived risk and switching intention," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1-13.
    21. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Pham, Son Truong & Nguyen, Thao Phuong Thi & Su, Diep Ngoc & Luu, Tuan Trong & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2025. "Exploring the switch to urban train services: The impact of perceived accessibility and its moderating effects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    22. Jan Dul & Sven Hauff & Ricarda B. Bouncken, 2023. "Necessary condition analysis (NCA): review of research topics and guidelines for good practice," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 683-714, February.
    23. Mo, Baichuan & Kong, Hui & Wang, Hao & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Li, Ruimin, 2021. "Impact of pricing policy change on on-street parking demand and user satisfaction: A case study in Nanning, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 445-469.
    24. Adsule, Poonam & Kadali, B Raghuram, 2024. "Analysis of contributing factors in decision to bicycle in developing countries context," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 50-58.
    25. Niu, Zhipeng & Hu, Xiaowei & Qi, Shouming & Yang, Haihua & Wang, Siqing & An, Shi, 2021. "Determinants to parking mode alternatives: A model integrating technology acceptance model and satisfaction–loyalty model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 216-234.
    26. Hartieni, Patricia & Joewono, Tri Basuki & Dharmowijoyo, Dimas, 2024. "The effects of planned behaviour, spatiotemporal variables and lifestyle on public transport use: An exploratory study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    27. Ragin, Charles C., 2006. "Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 291-310, July.
    28. Murugan, Manivel & Marisamynathan, Sankaran, 2024. "Policy analysis for sustainable EV charging facility adoption using SEM-ANN approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    29. Liao, Chechen & Palvia, Prashant & Chen, Jain-Liang, 2009. "Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: Toward a Technology Continuance Theory (TCT)," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 309-320.
    30. Dul, J. & Hak, A. & Goertz, G. & Voss, C., 2010. "Necessary Condition Hypotheses in Operations Management," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-019-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    31. Elias, Wafa & Shiftan, Yoram, 2012. "The influence of individual’s risk perception and attitudes on travel behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1241-1251.
    32. Shoup, Donald C., 2006. "Cruising for Parking," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt55s7079f, University of California Transportation Center.
    33. Chien, Yu-Shyun & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2025. "Investigating users’ intention to re-use shared electric scooters through a combined behavioral model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 533-544.
    34. Ekramifard, Ali & Khademi, Navid & Chaiyasarn, Krisada & Zheng, Zuduo, 2024. "Disability-specific factors in paratransit system continuance: Implications for transportation policy and practice in low-income developing countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 173-189.
    35. Cheng, Peng & OuYang, Zhe & Liu, Yang, 2019. "Understanding bike sharing use over time by employing extended technology continuance theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 433-443.
    36. Oliver, Richard L, 1993. "Cognitive, Affective, and Attribute BAses of the Satisfaction Response," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 418-430, December.
    37. Cruz-Jesus, Frederico & Figueira-Alves, Hugo & Tam, Carlos & Pinto, Diego Costa & Oliveira, Tiago & Venkatesh, Viswanath, 2023. "Pragmatic and idealistic reasons: What drives electric vehicle drivers' satisfaction and continuance intention?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    38. Rejali, Sina & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Esmaeli, Saeed & Shiwakoti, Nirajan, 2023. "Comparison of technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior, and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to assess a priori acceptance of fully automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    39. Olfindo, Rosechin, 2021. "Transport accessibility, residential satisfaction, and moving intention in a context of limited travel mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 153-166.
    40. Gu, Ziyuan & Li, Yifan & Saberi, Meead & Rashidi, Taha H. & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2023. "Macroscopic parking dynamics and equitable pricing: Integrating trip-based modeling with simulation-based robust optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 354-381.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niu, Zhipeng & Hu, Xiaowei & Qi, Shouming & Yang, Haihua & Wang, Siqing & An, Shi, 2021. "Determinants to parking mode alternatives: A model integrating technology acceptance model and satisfaction–loyalty model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 216-234.
    2. Niu, Zhipeng & Hu, Xiaowei & Fatmi, Mahmudur & Qi, Shouming & Wang, Siqing & Yang, Haihua & An, Shi, 2023. "Parking occupancy prediction under COVID-19 anti-pandemic policies: A model based on a policy-aware temporal convolutional network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Kumar, Rajeev Ranjan & Raj, Alok & Ajith Kumar, J., 2025. "The energy efficiency paradox in electric vehicle adoption: Estimating the internal discount rate and the influences of behavioural factors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    4. Li, Kun & Xin, Xinai & Hu, Zhiqiang & Zhao, Jiahui & Zhang, Zhe & Yu, Qing, 2025. "Do residential areas require shared parking? A case study of Tianjin, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Ziyue Shan & Chenjing Zhou & Xiafei Song & Siyang Liu, 2022. "Influence Mechanism of Urban Staggered Shared Parking Policy on Behavioral Intentions of Users and Providers Based on Extended Planned Behavior Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Zhang, Kai & Cheng, Xiaoting, 2025. "Determinants of consumers’ intentions to use smart home devices from the perspective of perceived value: A mixed SEM, NCA, and fsQCA study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Ekramifard, Ali & Khademi, Navid & Chaiyasarn, Krisada & Zheng, Zuduo, 2024. "Disability-specific factors in paratransit system continuance: Implications for transportation policy and practice in low-income developing countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 173-189.
    8. Zhen Wang & John Lim & Xiaojia Guo, 2010. "Negotiator Satisfaction in NSS-Facilitated Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 279-300, May.
    9. Yunxiang Zhang & Xianmin Song & Pengfei Tao & Haitao Li & Tianshu Zhan & Qian Cao, 2023. "Investigating Factors for Travelers’ Parking Behavior Intentions in Changchun, China, under the Influence of Smart Parking Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Ahmadian, Mohammad Mahdi & Khatami, Mostafa & Baker, Douglas & Paz, Alexander, 2025. "Understanding urban parking satisfaction: Implications for curb space management using multicriteria analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    11. de Oña, Juan, 2020. "The role of involvement with public transport in the relationship between service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 296-318.
    12. Ostermeijer, Francis & Koster, Hans & Nunes, Leonardo & van Ommeren, Jos, 2022. "Citywide parking policy and traffic: Evidence from Amsterdam," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    13. Hasanburak Yucel & Murat Ergün & Gozde Bakioglu, 2025. "Will Conventional Public Transport Users Adopt Autonomous Public Transport? A Model Integrating UTAUT Model and Satisfaction–Loyalty Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-31, October.
    14. Hsu, Chin-Lung & Lin, Judy Chuan-Chuan, 2016. "Effect of perceived value and social influences on mobile app stickiness and in-app purchase intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 42-53.
    15. Her-Sen Doong & Hsiangchu Lai, 2008. "Exploring usage continuance of e-negotiation systems: expectation and disconfirmation approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 111-126, March.
    16. Armah, Abdul Karim & Li, Jinfa & Wei, Mengdi, 2025. "Effect of infrastructure and technological factors on slum online commerce and product delivery: A structural functionalism perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    17. Santos, Georgina & Behrendt, Hannah & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2010. "Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 46-91.
    18. Barnes, Stuart J. & Vidgen, Richard T., 2014. "Technology socialness and Web site satisfaction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 12-25.
    19. Tang, Wei & Zheng, Liang & Mei, Zhenyu, 2025. "Towards better parking provision: Insights from parking lot utilization analysis of Hangzhou, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    20. Ardeshiri, Ali & Safarighouzhdi, Farshid & Hossein Rashidi, Taha, 2021. "Measuring willingness to pay for shared parking," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 186-202.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:174:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25004044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.