IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p545-d1565307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dual Impact and Spatial Spillover Effects of the Digital Economy on Urban–Rural Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Jinxin Bian

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Decai Tang

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Yan Fang

    (College of Liberal Arts, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

Abstract

With the advent of the information age, the digital economy has become an important force in promoting economic and social development; however, its impact on urban–rural relations remains controversial. The primary objective of this paper is to conduct a comparative analysis of the spatiotemporal evolution trends of both the digital economy and urban–rural integration in China. It focuses on exploring the spatial spillover effects and dual effects of the digital economy on urban–rural integration. Utilizing comprehensive data from 31 provinces spanning from 2000 to 2021, this paper employs multiple econometric models to analyze the intricate relationship between these two phenomena. The key findings indicate that, in the short term, the digital economy has a dampening effect on urban–rural integration, with an estimated total short-term impact of −4.21. Conversely, in the long run, the digital economy significantly fosters urban–rural integration, exhibiting a long-term effect of 0.47. Moreover, the digital economy exhibits notable spatial spillover effects, influencing adjacent areas through mechanisms such as technology diffusion and knowledge dissemination. This spatial spillover effect is pronounced within a radius of one to two provinces or approximately 540 km and gradually diminishes as the distance increases. This paper provides a new perspective for understanding the complex relationship between the digital economy and urban–rural integration with an important reference value for promoting coordinated urban–rural development in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinxin Bian & Decai Tang & Yan Fang, 2025. "The Dual Impact and Spatial Spillover Effects of the Digital Economy on Urban–Rural Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-39, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:545-:d:1565307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/545/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/545/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emmanouil Tranos & Aura Reggiani & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "Accessibility of Cities in the Digital Economy," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-160/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. Lordan, Grace & Neumark, David, 2018. "People versus machines: The impact of minimum wages on automatable jobs," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 40-53.
    3. Xiaoshu Sun & Xianming Kuang, 2023. "Will advances in digital technology reduce the rural-urban income gap?," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 2194954-219, December.
    4. Duc, Dang Thi Viet & Dat, Tran Tho & Linh, Dang Huyen & Phong, Bui Xuan, 2024. "Measuring the digital economy in Vietnam," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3).
    5. Dapeng Hu & Masahisa Fujita, 2001. "Regional disparity in China 1985-1994: The effects of globalization and economic liberalization," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 35(1), pages 3-37.
    6. Xuefeng Hou & Dianfeng Zhang & Liyuan Fu & Fu Zeng & Qing Wang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Coupling Coordination Degree between Urban–Rural Integration and Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Wang, Weilong & Yang, Xiaodong & Cao, Jianhong & Bu, Wenchao & Dagestani, Abd Alwahed & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday & Dilanchiev, Azer & Ren, Siyu, 2022. "Energy internet, digital economy, and green economic growth: Evidence from China," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 1(2).
    8. Jonna Rickardsson, 2021. "The urban–rural divide in radical right populist support: the role of resident’s characteristics, urbanization trends and public service supply," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(1), pages 211-242, August.
    9. Chernozhukov, Victor & Hansen, Christian, 2006. "Instrumental quantile regression inference for structural and treatment effect models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 491-525, June.
    10. Elizabeth Seale, 2013. "Coping Strategies of Urban and Rural Welfare Organisations and the Regulation of the Poor," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 141-170, April.
    11. Liu, Guangqiang & Liu, Boyang, 2023. "How digital technology improves the high-quality development of enterprises and capital markets: A liquidity perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    12. Carlsson, Bo, 2004. "The Digital Economy: what is new and what is not?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 245-264, September.
    13. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    14. Roman Chinoracky & Tatiana Corejova, 2021. "How to evaluate the digital economy scale and potential?," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 536-552, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Chengyou & Zheng, Chunji & Liu, Mengxun & Wang, Zeru, 2024. "Digital economy spillover on energy saving and emission reduction: Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    2. Muller, Christophe, 2018. "Heterogeneity and nonconstant effect in two-stage quantile regression," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 3-12.
    3. Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández‐Val & Blaise Melly, 2013. "Inference on Counterfactual Distributions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(6), pages 2205-2268, November.
    4. Klomp, Jeroen, 2013. "Government interventions and default risk: Does one size fit all?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 641-653.
    5. Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández‐Val & Whitney Newey & Sami Stouli & Francis Vella, 2020. "Semiparametric estimation of structural functions in nonseparable triangular models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(2), pages 503-533, May.
    6. Kaplan, David M. & Sun, Yixiao, 2017. "Smoothed Estimating Equations For Instrumental Variables Quantile Regression," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 105-157, February.
    7. Paul Contoyannis & Jinhu Li, 2017. "The dynamics of adolescent depression: an instrumental variable quantile regression with fixed effects approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(3), pages 907-922, June.
    8. Imai, Susumu & Katayama, Hajime & Krishna, Kala, 2013. "A quantile-based test of protection for sale model," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 40-52.
    9. Fan, Ye & Lin, Nan, 2025. "Sequential quantile regression for stream data by least squares," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 249(PA).
    10. Balestra, Simone & Backes-Gellner, Uschi, 2017. "Heterogeneous returns to education over the wage distribution: Who profits the most?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 89-105.
    11. Pereda-Fernández, Santiago, 2023. "Identification and estimation of triangular models with a binary treatment," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 585-623.
    12. Tommaso Gabrieli & Antonio F. Galvao, Jr. & Antonio F. Galvao, Jr., 2010. "Who Benefits from Reducing the Cost of Formality? Quantile Regression Discontinuity Analysis," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2010-11, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    13. Gregory, Terry & Zierahn, Ulrich, 2022. "When the minimum wage really bites hard: The negative spillover effect on high-skilled workers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    14. Bengt Söderlund & Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall, 2017. "Capital Freedom, Financial Development and Provincial Economic Growth in China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 764-787, April.
    15. Xiu Xu & Weining Wang & Yongcheol Shin & Chaowen Zheng, 2024. "Dynamic Network Quantile Regression Model," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 407-421, April.
    16. Denis Chetverikov & Bradley Larsen & Christopher Palmer, 2016. "IV Quantile Regression for Group‐Level Treatments, With an Application to the Distributional Effects of Trade," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 809-833, March.
    17. Edward L. Glaeser & Sari Pekkala Kerr & William R. Kerr, 2015. "Entrepreneurship and Urban Growth: An Empirical Assessment with Historical Mines," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(2), pages 498-520, May.
    18. Marques, André M., 2022. "Is income inequality good or bad for growth? Further empirical evidence using data for all Brazilian cities," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 360-376.
    19. Zhenlin Yang & Liangjun Su, 2007. "Instrumental Variable Quantile Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models," Working Papers 05-2007, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    20. Christophe Muller, 2019. "Linear Quantile Regression and Endogeneity Correction," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 9(5), pages 123-128, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:545-:d:1565307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.