IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8938-d1767065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does an Environmental Protection Tax Promote or Inhibit the Market Value of Companies? Evidence from Chinese Polluting Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Chenghao Ye

    (Institute of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 620062 Yekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Igor A. Mayburov

    (Institute of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 620062 Yekaterinburg, Russia
    Institute for Research of Social and Economic Changes and Financial Policy, Financial University Under the Government of the Russian Federation, 125167 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

This study takes the environmental protection tax (EPT) implemented in China in 2018 as the policy background and systematically examines the impact mechanism and boundary conditions of EPT on the market value of listed companies in the polluting industries. The results indicate that EPT significantly inhibits Tobin’s Q of polluting companies. A one-unit increase in EPT leads to a 0.274-unit decrease in Tobin’s Q. The heterogeneity test reveals that the EPT shock exhibits a spatial gradient effect of “Eastern > Central > Western > Northeastern”. The rigidity of the tax system is stronger than that of the pollution discharge fee, and the effect on non-heavily polluting industries is stronger than that on heavily polluting industries. Mechanism analysis shows that while corporate financial flexibility can buffer against short-term EPT shocks, R&D investment and patent quality expose an “innovation trap” characterized by high investment but low conversion efficiency, largely determined by the type of innovation pursued. By elucidating the multiple moderating and mediating mechanisms at play, this study constructs an integrated “institutional pressure-resource constraints-market feedback” model, thereby providing a new analytical framework for environmental economics in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenghao Ye & Igor A. Mayburov, 2025. "Does an Environmental Protection Tax Promote or Inhibit the Market Value of Companies? Evidence from Chinese Polluting Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-26, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8938-:d:1767065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8938/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8938/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8938-:d:1767065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.