IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v84y2024icp774-786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does environmental protection tax impact corporate ESG greenwashing? A quasi-natural experiment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Cuixia
  • Li, Xiuxiu
  • Xu, Qifa
  • Liu, Junhang

Abstract

The recently implemented environmental protection tax (EPT) policy in China provides the opportunity to conduct a quasi-natural experiment to empirically evaluate environmental regulations’ impact on corporate practices. We adopt the difference-in-differences method to analyze the effect and mechanisms of the EPT on corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) greenwashing based on Chinese A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2021. The empirical results show that the EPT drives companies to engage in ESG greenwashing, significantly increasing ESG greenwashing by approximately 13.16 %. The mechanism tests demonstrate that the EPT exerts governance pressure but does not create more resources, making companies more likely to achieve compliance through greenwashing. Furthermore, the effect of the EPT on ESG greenwashing is more pronounced for large companies and those located in regions with high economic development and strong regulatory enforcement. Our study provides solid evidence with valuable implications for improving the EPT policy to achieve green and sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Cuixia & Li, Xiuxiu & Xu, Qifa & Liu, Junhang, 2024. "Does environmental protection tax impact corporate ESG greenwashing? A quasi-natural experiment in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 774-786.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:84:y:2024:i:c:p:774-786
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2024.09.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002522
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2024.09.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:84:y:2024:i:c:p:774-786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.