IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5437-d1101786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Evolution of Global Electronics Trade Network Structure since the 21st Century from the Chinese Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodong Zhu

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Xin Liu

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

Abstract

With the development of technology and the widespread adoption of digital technology, the trade volume of electronic products keeps improving. For a country’s trade situation, it is important to study the global trade of electronic products. In this paper, the data on global trade in electronic products from 240–246 countries and regions from 2000 to 2021 are used to create complex network models. Characteristic indicators, such as the network density, average clustering coefficient, average path length, and centrality are used to analyze the evolution of the global electronic product trade network pattern. The results of the complex network analysis show the following: (1) Since 2000, global electronic products have shown a trend of fluctuating growth, showing a state of three-pole differentiation. In addition, the trade volume is unevenly distributed, with the United States and China in the leading positions. (2) The global electronics trade network has significant scale-free and small-world characteristics, with high network density and close ties between countries. (3) There are differences between the closeness centrality and the betweenness centrality of the global electronic product trade network. The core countries are mainly in Europe and North America, while the influence of Asian countries is rising. (4) The global electronic product trade network has a clear division of communities and undergoes dynamic evolution. (5) Global electronic product trade is influenced by natural resources, economic and technological strength, political culture, and other factors. Finally, three policy suggestions are made for the development of China’s electronics trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodong Zhu & Xin Liu, 2023. "Research on the Evolution of Global Electronics Trade Network Structure since the 21st Century from the Chinese Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5437-:d:1101786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5437/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5437/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frankel, Jeffrey A & Rose, Andrew K, 1998. "The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(449), pages 1009-1025, July.
    2. Baldwin, Richard & Taglioni, Daria, 2006. "Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations," CEPR Discussion Papers 5850, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Freeman, Chris & Louca, Francisco, 2002. "As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199251056.
    4. Rebeca Utrilla-Catalan & Rocío Rodríguez-Rivero & Viviana Narvaez & Virginia Díaz-Barcos & Maria Blanco & Javier Galeano, 2022. "Growing Inequality in the Coffee Global Value Chain: A Complex Network Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-27, January.
    5. David Hummels, 2007. "Transportation Costs and International Trade in the Second Era of Globalization," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(3), pages 131-154, Summer.
    6. Qiao Chen & Jianquan Cheng & Zhiqin Wu, 2019. "Evolution of the Cultural Trade Network in “the Belt and Road” Region: Implication for Global Cultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Yinpeng Liu & Xiangyun Gao & Jianfeng Guo, 2018. "Network Features of the EU Carbon Trade System: An Evolutionary Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jules Hugot & Camilo Umana Dajud, 2016. "Trade costs and the Suez and Panama Canals," Working Papers 2016-29, CEPII research center.
    2. Abdoulaye Seck, 2017. "How Facilitating Trade would Benefit Trade in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of African Development, African Finance and Economic Association (AFEA), vol. 19(1), pages 1-26.
    3. Chen, Natalie & Novy, Dennis, 2008. "International Trade Integration: A Disaggregated Approach," CEPR Discussion Papers 7103, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Wessel, Jan, 2019. "Evaluating the transport-mode-specific trade effects of different transport infrastructure types," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 42-57.
    5. Michele Fratianni & Francesco Marchionne, 2012. "Trade Costs and Economic Development," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 88(2), pages 137-163, April.
    6. Jan Fidrmuc & Jarko Fidrmuc, 2016. "Foreign languages and trade: evidence from a natural experiment," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 31-49, February.
    7. Huang, Shuo & Fidrmuc, Jan & Fidrmuc, Jarko, 2015. "Whither China? Reform and economic integration among Chinese regions," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 94-110.
    8. Mohd Hussain Kunroo & Irfan Ahmad Sofi & Naushad Ali Azad, 2016. "Trade implications of the Euro in EMU countries: a panel gravity analysis," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 43(2), pages 391-413, May.
    9. Matthieu Crozet & Pamina Koenig, 2010. "Structural gravity equations with intensive and extensive margins," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 43(1), pages 41-62, February.
    10. Erik Figueiredo & Luiz Lima & Georg Schaur, 2016. "The effect of the Euro on the bilateral trade distribution," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 17-29, February.
    11. Biermann, Franziska, 2012. "The impact of distance in seaborne trade: An analysis of bilateral container transport flows," HWWI Research Papers 134, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    12. Dennis Novy, 2013. "Gravity Redux: Measuring International Trade Costs With Panel Data," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 101-121, January.
    13. Jérôme Trotignon, 2010. "La restriction des émissions de CO2 pénalise-t-elle les exportations ? Un modèle de gravité avec données de panel et variables muettes régionales," Post-Print halshs-00477244, HAL.
    14. Erick Kitenge & Sajal Lahiri, 2022. "Is the Internet bringing down language‐based barriers to international trade?," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 566-605, May.
    15. Thomas Orliac, 2012. "The economics of trade facilitation [L'économie de la facilitation des échanges]," SciencePo Working papers Main tel-03681980, HAL.
    16. Takeshi Yagihashi & David D. Selover, 2017. "How Do the Trans-Pacific Economies Affect the USA? An Industrial Sector Approach," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(10), pages 2097-2124, October.
    17. Clément Bosquet & Hervé Boulhol, 2015. "What is really puzzling about the “distance puzzle”," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 151(1), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Eddy Bekkers & Joseph F. Francois & Hugo Rojas†Romagosa, 2018. "Melting Ice Caps and the Economic Impact of Opening the Northern Sea Route," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(610), pages 1095-1127, May.
    19. J.M.C. Santos Silva & Silvana Tenreyro, 2010. "Currency Unions in Prospect and Retrospect," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 51-74, September.
    20. Chen, Natalie & Novy, Dennis, 2011. "Gravity, trade integration, and heterogeneity across industries," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 206-221.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5437-:d:1101786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.