IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p7971-d1146165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Development and Implementation of Quality Management Excellence Models in Public Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Effrosyni Taraza

    (Department of Early Childhood Education, University of Western Macedonia, 53100 Florina, Greece)

  • Sofia Anastasiadou

    (Department of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Western Macedonia, 50200 Florina, Greece
    Department of Economics and Business, Neapolis University, Pafos 8402, Cyprus)

  • Andreas Masouras

    (Department of Economics and Business, Neapolis University, Pafos 8402, Cyprus)

  • Christos Papademetriou

    (Department of Economics and Business, Neapolis University, Pafos 8402, Cyprus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the European Foundation for Quality Management Excellence Model and Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma approaches in public organizations. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic literature review was conducted based on articles from three academic publishers (Emerald, Elsevier/Science Direct and Taylor & Francis). The 88 selected journal articles were published between 2004 and 2022 and documented the results of the quality tools. Findings: The effects of applying the models in the public sector are presented. From the literature review, specific findings were identified regarding the motivations of all areas of education and services and the challenges they face in applying the qualitative tool methodologies. The main topics discussed are the human factors involved in implementing quality tools. Research limitations/implications: An important limitation is that data were drawn from only three major journals and the authors did not always have access to all databases and peer-reviewed journals or to any review articles in languages other than English. Multiple keywords limited the article search, as qualitative tools have been widely used in the private sector but less so in the public sector. Practical implications: The results and limitations detailed in the study and presentation of the 88 articles will motivate academic researchers to further study the application of qualitative tools in the public sector and fill the knowledge gap caused by the limited publications on this topic. Originality/value: The European Foundation for Quality Management Excellence Model and the Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma approaches have not been widely implemented in the public sector, and literature reviews are limited despite the increasing trend of their use in the sector in recent years. More future research in public administration is needed to determine the effects and limitations of implementing qualitative tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Effrosyni Taraza & Sofia Anastasiadou & Andreas Masouras & Christos Papademetriou, 2023. "Sustainable Development and Implementation of Quality Management Excellence Models in Public Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7971-:d:1146165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7971/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7971/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morris, Michael & Schindehutte, Minet & Allen, Jeffrey, 2005. "The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 726-735, June.
    2. Andrea Chiarini & Enrico Bracci, 2013. "Implementing Lean Six Sigma in healthcare: issues from Italy," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 361-368, September.
    3. Ola Khalid AlZawati & Hamdi Bashir & Imad Alsyouf, 2020. "Modelling and analyzing of critical success factors for implementing UAE’s Government Excellence Model in the public sector: an ISM and Fuzzy-MICMAC approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1107-1132, December.
    4. Henry Chesbrough & Richard S. Rosenbloom, 2002. "The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(3), pages 529-555, June.
    5. Lee, Jung Young & McFadden, Kathleen L. & Lee, Min Kyung & Gowen, Charles R., 2021. "U.S. hospital culture profiles for better performance in patient safety, patient satisfaction, Six Sigma, and lean implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Rodríguez-Mantilla, Jesús Miguel & Martínez-Zarzuelo, Angélica & Fernández-Cruz, Francisco José, 2020. "Do ISO:9001 standards and EFQM model differ in their impact on the external relations and communication system at schools?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Lukrafka, Tatiany Oleques & Silva, Diego Souza & Echeveste, Marcia, 2020. "A geographic picture of Lean adoption in the public sector: Cases, approaches, and a refreshed agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 506-517.
    8. repec:eme:mrn000:01409170910965224 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Boon Sin, Ang & Zailani, Suhaiza & Iranmanesh, Mohammad & Ramayah, T., 2015. "Structural equation modelling on knowledge creation in Six Sigma DMAIC project and its impact on organizational performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 105-117.
    10. Preetam Singh Negi & Akash Mandaliya & Abhijit Mahida & Alap Patel & Vishal Singh Patyal, 2017. "Six Sigma in construction industry: a review," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(4), pages 451-465.
    11. Luis Fonseca & António Amaral & José Oliveira, 2021. "Quality 4.0: The EFQM 2020 Model and Industry 4.0 Relationships and Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    12. B. Demil & X. Lecocq, 2010. "Business model evolution : in search of dynamic consistency," Post-Print hal-00572915, HAL.
    13. Tony Kinder, 2012. "Learning, Innovating and Performance in Post-New Public Management of Locally Delivered Public Services," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 403-428, March.
    14. Shradha Gupta & Monica Sharma & Vijaya Sunder M., 2016. "Lean services: a systematic review," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(8), pages 1025-1056, November.
    15. Alessandro Laureani & Jiju Antony & Alex Douglas, 2010. "Lean six sigma in a call centre: a case study," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(8), pages 757-768, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Effrosyni Taraza & Sofia Anastasiadou & Christos Papademetriou & Andreas Masouras, 2024. "Evaluation of Quality and Equality in Education Using the European Foundation for Quality Management Excellence Model—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    2. Souto, Jaime E., 2015. "Business model innovation and business concept innovation as the context of incremental innovation and radical innovation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 142-155.
    3. René Bohnsack & Francesca Ciulli & Ans Kolk, 2021. "The role of business models in firm internationalization: An exploration of European electricity firms in the context of the energy transition," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(5), pages 824-852, July.
    4. Lehoux, P. & Daudelin, G. & Williams-Jones, B. & Denis, J.-L. & Longo, C., 2014. "How do business model and health technology design influence each other? Insights from a longitudinal case study of three academic spin-offs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1025-1038.
    5. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. OGREAN Claudia, 2015. "Business Models To Meet The Challenges Of The Global Economy. A Literature Review," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 127-146, December.
    7. Thomson, Linus & Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Jovanovic, Marin, 2023. "Conceptualizing business model piloting: An experiential learning process for autonomous solutions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    8. Luigi Fusco Girard & Marilena Vecco, 2021. "The “Intrinsic Value” of Cultural Heritage as Driver for Circular Human-Centered Adaptive Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, March.
    9. Xuerong Li & Han Qiao & Shouyang Wang, 2017. "Exploring evolution and emerging trends in business model study: a co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 869-887, May.
    10. Rong, Ke & Patton, Dean & Chen, Weiwei, 2018. "Business models dynamics and business ecosystems in the emerging 3D printing industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 234-245.
    11. Randhawa, Krithika & Wilden, Ralf & Gudergan, Siegfried, 2021. "How to innovate toward an ambidextrous business model? The role of dynamic capabilities and market orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 618-634.
    12. Engwall, Mats & Kaulio, Matti & Karakaya, Emrah & Miterev, Maxim & Berlin, Daniel, 2021. "Experimental networks for business model innovation: A way for incumbents to navigate sustainability transitions?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Tommaso Pucci & Christian Simoni & Lorenzo Zanni, 2013. "Modelli di business e strategie di marketing nelle medie imprese. La gestione della crisi tra continuit? e cambiamento," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 25-45.
    14. Clinton, Eric & McAdam, Maura & Gamble, Jordan Robert, 2018. "Transgenerational entrepreneurial family firms: An examination of the business model construct," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 269-285.
    15. Daniela Andreini & Cristina Bettinelli & Nicolai J. Foss & Marco Mismetti, 2022. "Business model innovation: a review of the process-based literature," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(4), pages 1089-1121, December.
    16. Sarah Mahdjour, 2015. "Set Up For Growth? — An Exploratory Analysis Of The Relationship Of Growth Intention And Business Models," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-31, December.
    17. Arash Rezazadeh & Ana Carvalho, 2018. "A value-based approach to business model innovation: Defining the elements of the concept," NIPE Working Papers 12/2018, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    18. Giacomo Fabietti & Francesca Trovarelli, 2016. "The role of Eco-control in the implementation of Sustainable Business Models," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(3), pages 141-172.
    19. Anna-Greta Nyström & Miia Mustonen, 2017. "The dynamic approach to business models," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(3), pages 123-137, December.
    20. M. Moore, 2021. "Collaboration in Coworking Spaces: Impact on Firm Innovativeness and Business Models," Papers 2111.09866, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7971-:d:1146165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.