IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3847-d355455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Model to Predict Plant-Based Food Choice-Empirical Study in Southern Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Thanh-Lam Nguyen

    (Office of International Affairs, Lac Hong University, Dong Nai 810000, Vietnam)

  • Do Huu Tai

    (Board of Rectorate, Lac Hong University, Dong Nai 810000, Vietnam)

  • Lam Thanh Hien

    (Board of Rectorate, Lac Hong University, Dong Nai 810000, Vietnam)

  • Doan Manh Quynh

    (Board of Rectorate, Dong Nai Technology University, Dong Nai 810000, Vietnam
    Faculty of Postgraduate Studies, Lac Hong University, Dong Nai 810000, Vietnam)

  • Phan Ngoc Son

    (Board of Rectorate, Dong Nai Technology University, Dong Nai 810000, Vietnam
    Faculty of Postgraduate Studies, Lac Hong University, Dong Nai 810000, Vietnam)

Abstract

The beneficial advantages of plant-based diets towards human beings have been well addressed over the last few decades. More and more people are now enjoying plant-based diets for their physical health, psychological health, animal rights, environment protection, etc. However, there are still many stereotypes about the lifestyle. Hence, this study aims at identifying key factors affecting the plant-based food choices so that we can propose feasible implications to widely promote plant-based diets across communities for their better health, eudemonic well-being and life satisfaction as well as the sustainable survival of our beloved planet—“Mother Earth”. Based on statistical analysis results of data collected from 1477 participants in 10 out of 19 provinces/cities in Southern Vietnam, the plant-based food choice is found significantly affected by not only gender and marriage status but also by a so-called SHOULD Model, where: (1) S refers to S pirituality and S ocial relationships; (2) H refers to H ealth concerns; (3) O refers to O pulence of plant-based foods and O utlook on life; (4) U refers to U nderstanding of human body structures; (5) L refers to L ove towards animals; and (6) D refers to D iet knowledge. Among the identified factors, “understanding of human body structures” and “outlook on life” are two new factors proposed in this study, fulfilling the existing literature about the determinants of plant-based food choice. From such findings, some managerial implications are proposed to not only promote plant-based lifestyle but also help to develop plant-based food business in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Thanh-Lam Nguyen & Do Huu Tai & Lam Thanh Hien & Doan Manh Quynh & Phan Ngoc Son, 2020. "A Novel Model to Predict Plant-Based Food Choice-Empirical Study in Southern Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3847-:d:355455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3847/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3847/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karl-Heinz Erb & Christian Lauk & Thomas Kastner & Andreas Mayer & Michaela C. Theurl & Helmut Haberl, 2016. "Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, September.
    2. Marion Desquilbet & Elise Maigne & Sylvette Monier-Dilhan, 2018. "Organic Food Retailing and the Conventionalisation Debate," Post-Print hal-01792846, HAL.
    3. Allison Christopher & John P. Bartkowski & Timothy Haverda, 2018. "Portraits of Veganism: A Comparative Discourse Analysis of a Second-Order Subculture," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, July.
    4. David Tilman & Michael Clark, 2014. "Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7528), pages 518-522, November.
    5. Peter Scarborough & Paul Appleby & Anja Mizdrak & Adam Briggs & Ruth Travis & Kathryn Bradbury & Timothy Key, 2014. "Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 179-192, July.
    6. Leahy, Eimear & Lyons, Seán & Tol, Richard S. J., 2010. "An Estimate of the Number of Vegetarians in the World," Papers WP340, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    7. Mujcic, R. & Oswald, A.J., 2016. "Evolution of well-being and happiness after increases in consumption of fruit and vegetables," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(8), pages 1504-1510.
    8. Carfora, V. & Caso, D. & Conner, M., 2017. "Correlational study and randomised controlled trial for understanding and changing red meat consumption: The role of eating identities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 244-252.
    9. Martin C. Heller & Gregory A. Keoleian, 2015. "Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimates of U.S. Dietary Choices and Food Loss," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(3), pages 391-401, June.
    10. Guillemette, Ann-Renee & Cranfield, John A.L., 2012. "Food Expenditures: The Effect of a Vegetarian Diet and Organic Foods," 2012 AAEA/EAAE Food Environment Symposium 123391, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Fredrik Hedenus & Stefan Wirsenius & Daniel Johansson, 2014. "The importance of reduced meat and dairy consumption for meeting stringent climate change targets," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 79-91, May.
    12. Goldstein, Benjamin & Hansen, Steffen Foss & Gjerris, Mickey & Laurent, Alexis & Birkved, Morten, 2016. "Ethical aspects of life cycle assessments of diets," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 139-151.
    13. Desquilbet, Marion & Maigné, Elise & Monier-Dilhan, Sylvette, 2018. "Organic Food Retailing and the Conventionalisation Debate," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 194-203.
    14. Daniela Silva Canella & Renata Bertazzi Levy & Ana Paula Bortoletto Martins & Rafael Moreira Claro & Jean-Claude Moubarac & Larissa Galastri Baraldi & Geoffrey Cannon & Carlos Augusto Monteiro, 2014. "Ultra-Processed Food Products and Obesity in Brazilian Households (2008–2009)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-6, March.
    15. Richard Twine, 2014. "Vegan Killjoys at the Table—Contesting Happiness and Negotiating Relationships with Food Practices," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evelyn Markoni & Thanh Mai Ha & Franziska Götze & Isabel Häberli & Minh Hai Ngo & Reto Martin Huwiler & Mathilde Delley & Anh Duc Nguyen & Thi Lam Bui & Nhu Thinh Le & Bao Duong Pham & Thomas A. Brunn, 2023. "Healthy or Environmentally Friendly? Meat Consumption Practices of Green Consumers in Vietnam and Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer A. Jay & Raffaella D’Auria & J. Cully Nordby & David Andy Rice & David A. Cleveland & Anthony Friscia & Sophie Kissinger & Marc Levis & Hannah Malan & Deepak Rajagopal & Joel R. Reynolds & We, 2019. "Reduction of the carbon footprint of college freshman diets after a food-based environmental science course," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 547-564, June.
    2. Perino, Grischa & Schwirplies, Claudia, 2022. "Meaty arguments and fishy effects: Field experimental evidence on the impact of reasons to reduce meat consumption," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Anthony Fardet & Marion Desquilbet & Edmond Rock, 2022. "The compliance of French purchasing behaviors with a healthy and sustainable diet: a 1-yr follow-up of regular customers in hypermarkets," Post-Print hal-03353849, HAL.
    4. Bowles, Nicholas & Alexander, Samuel & Hadjikakou, Michalis, 2019. "The livestock sector and planetary boundaries: A ‘limits to growth’ perspective with dietary implications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 128-136.
    5. Rosemary Green & James Milner & Alan Dangour & Andy Haines & Zaid Chalabi & Anil Markandya & Joseph Spadaro & Paul Wilkinson, 2015. "The potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the UK through healthy and realistic dietary change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 253-265, March.
    6. Hadjikakou, Michalis, 2017. "Trimming the excess: environmental impacts of discretionary food consumption in Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 119-128.
    7. Karynn Capilé & Claire Parkinson & Richard Twine & Erickson Leon Kovalski & Rita Leal Paixão, 2021. "Exploring the Representation of Cows on Dairy Product Packaging in Brazil and the United Kingdom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Dennis Lawo & Margarita Esau & Philip Engelbutzeder & Gunnar Stevens, 2020. "Going Vegan: The Role(s) of ICT in Vegan Practice Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Artur Kwasek & Maria Kocot & Damian Kocot, 2022. "Determinants of Purchase Behavior of Young E-Consumers of Eco-Friendly Products to Further Sustainable Consumption Based on Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Menrad, K. & Emberger-Klein, A. & Schops, J., 2018. "Factors influencing consumers behavioral intention towards climate-friendly food consumption in Southern Germany," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277108, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Helen Harwatt & Joan Sabaté & Gidon Eshel & Sam Soret & William Ripple, 2017. "Substituting beans for beef as a contribution toward US climate change targets," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 261-270, July.
    12. Brent F. Kim & Keeve E. Nachman & Roni A. Neff & Marie L. Spiker & Raychel E. Santo, 2016. "Concerns re: interpretation and translation of findings in Energy use, blue water footprint, and greenhouse gas emissions for current food consumption patterns and dietary recommendations in the US," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 104-105, March.
    13. Bonnet, Céline & Bouamra-Mechemache, Zohra & Réquillart, Vincent & Treich, Nicolas, 2020. "Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    14. Boehm, Rebecca & Wilde, Parke E. & Ver Ploeg, Michele & Costello, Christine & Cash, Sean B., 2018. "A Comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Household Food Choices," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 67-76.
    15. Bazoche, Pascale & Guinet, Nicolas & Poret, Sylvaine & Teyssier, Sabrina, 2021. "Does the provision of information increase the substitution of animal proteins with plant-based proteins? An experimental investigation into consumer choices," Working Papers 313663, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    16. Desquilbet, Marion & Maigné, Elise & Monier-Dilhan, Sylvette, 2018. "Organic Food Retailing and the Conventionalisation Debate," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 194-203.
    17. Jayet, Pierre-Alain & Isbasoiu, Ancuta & De Cara, Stéphane, 2020. "Slaughter cattle to secure food calories and reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emissions? Some prospective estimates for France," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(1), July.
    18. Mario Herrero & Benjamin Henderson & Petr Havlík & Philip K. Thornton & Richard T. Conant & Pete Smith & Stefan Wirsenius & Alexander N. Hristov & Pierre Gerber & Margaret Gill & Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, 2016. "Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(5), pages 452-461, May.
    19. Einhorn, Laura, 2020. "Normative social influence on meat consumption," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    20. Louise Seconda & Julia Baudry & Benjamin Allès & Christine Boizot-Szantai & Louis-Georges Soler & Pilar Galan & Serge Hercberg & Brigitte Langevin & Denis Lairon & Philippe Pointereau & Emmanuelle Kes, 2018. "Comparing nutritional, economic, and environmental performances of diets according to their levels of greenhouse gas emissions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 155-172, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3847-:d:355455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.